Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 2:39 pm

That's the next move in the panty dance - seek absolution, offer same in return. 

It is up to men to stand against lies. That leaves you out - not me, fruitcake.

There are two sexes, That's why there is only one choice to change your current sex into - the other sex. So called "gender reassignment surgery" is clearly misnamed. It should only be called SEX reassignment, as there are only TWO - not three, fruitcake - sexes.

Your claim that a failure to neatly fit the definition of one sex or another = a third (or more) sex(es) is ridiculous on its face. If a third (and fourth, and fifth) sex cannot be OBJECTIVELY DEFINED, then it isn't  thing, you **** miway rube. Google science, chump.

It is up to men to stand against lies. That leaves you out - not me, fruitcake.

One of us has knelt before men.


Loathsome sodomite.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 1:35 pm

Oh....you have vague descriptions.

Why not refer to these screenshots and be more specific.

No questions, dick sucker.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 2:03 pm

What does this prove?

No questions, dick sucker.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm

One of us has knelt before men.

Loathsome sodomite.

Your oft'-displayed homophobia is merely another curtsey in your ongoing panty dance, fruity. Everyone sees it. You shimmy and shake - but you never stand as a man and defend a thesis.

You're a weak simpleton trained to shriek about science but not trained in its most basic and fundamental precepts. This allows you to pretend to yourself and others that you "stand for" that which you cannot even define - a true irrelevant pissant, you are.

That is the word that best describes you, on every issue: Irrelevant. Like your first post in this thread - and every post that followed.
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm

Your oft'-displayed homophobia is merely another curtsey in your ongoing panty dance, fruity. Everyone sees it. You shimmy and shake - but you never stand as a man and defend a thesis.

You're a weak simpleton trained to shriek about science but not trained in its most basic and fundamental precepts. This allows you to pretend to yourself and others that you "stand for" that which you cannot even define - a true irrelevant pissant, you are.

That is the word that best describes you, on every issue: Irrelevant. Like your first post in this thread - and every post that followed.

:rofl:  

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:06 pm

Have you defined what a "woman" is yet?

Huey » 12 Jul 2022, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:14 pm

Have you defined what a "woman" is yet?

Never spent much time thinking about it.

Is that why you bought yours?

In the hope that there's truth in advertising?

sootedupCyndi » 12 Jul 2022, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 7:11 am

Alright!! I'm getting confused!!! Was that person a real woman or a man with long hair?

Oh no....not you of all people.....what's the definition of a woman?  

Huey » 12 Jul 2022, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:14 pm

Have you defined what a "woman" is yet?

as long as it's in a dress he, she, it, dickhead doesn't care...BV's a mangina connoisseur...he even smells of ***...just not his own
 

nefarious101 » 12 Jul 2022, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:23 pm

Oh no....not you of all people.....what's the definition of a woman?

What is a woman?
ok a woman is a person.. who has different junk. below the belt.. they have babies...
They usually are way less stronger then a man.
and dont the have muscles like men..
Most like me.. would prefer do femine things.. pretty things.. looking nice..

Not me.. but many like being mothers.. raising kids... so many quit careers once they have a baby. Some cant but i believe they would like too..
The ones that prefer to stay in the workplace should be left to do that if they want. Some want to be lawyers etc etc.. 
is that enough? or would you like more explanation?   lol

 
 

sootedupCyndi » 12 Jul 2022, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:41 pm

What is a woman?
ok a woman is a person.. who has different junk. below the belt.. they have babies...
They usually are way less stronger then a man.
and dont the have muscles like men..
Most like me.. would prefer do femine things.. pretty things.. looking nice..

Not me.. but many like being mothers.. raising kids... so many quit careers once they have a baby. Some cant but i believe they would like too..
The ones that prefer to stay in the workplace should be left to do that if they want. Some want to be lawyers etc etc.. 
is that enough? or would you like more explanation?   lol

ohhhh...one of those little people who are supposed to do what they are told, like it and not ask questions.....everyone should own one...or two

nefarious101 » 12 Jul 2022, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:54 pm

ohhhh...one of those little people who are supposed to do what they are told, like it and not ask questions.....everyone should own one...or two

you're married.. you know what a woman is? and a mushroom! LOL  

sootedupCyndi » 12 Jul 2022, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:58 pm

you're married.. you know what a woman is? and a mushroom! LOL

yep...an the little lady bats for both teams

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:20 pm

Never spent much time thinking about it.

Is that why you bought yours?

In the hope that there's truth in advertising?

That question still confuses you...  
You're just like that **** little eye-rolling *** in the video.

 

DeezerShoove » 12 Jul 2022, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 9:13 pm

That question still confuses you...  
You're just like that **** little eye-rolling *** in the video.

You another bitter low single digits guy, Coozie?

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 9:34 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 9:34 pm

You another bitter low single digits guy, Coozie?

When you ever going to accept all you ever were adapting to the moment here? Right now you are just a fictitious social identity thinking beyond your ancestral displacement mutually evolving in plain sight.

So many follow your behavior, but not enough to stop the backlash arrived over a decade ago. Define what the final conflict is in two options, extinction or correcting ancestral behavior forward.

sootedupCyndi » 12 Jul 2022, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2022, 3:58 pm

you're married.. you know what a woman is? and a mushroom! LOL

More loony **** from dim-0-craps and their apparatchiks:That Senate Abortion Testimony Just Got Even Wackier

By Nick Arama | Jul 12, 2022 5:00 PM ET
  


As we reported previously, the Democrats are making some interesting arguments during a hearing on abortion in the Senate. That is to say, they’re wandering into trainwreck territory with one of the witnesses they put on — Khiara Bridges, who is a law professor at UC Berkeley School of Law.

Bridges accused Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) of being transphobic because he asked if she meant “women” when she used the term “people with a capacity for pregnancy.” The professor then said he was opening up trans people to violence by the nature of his question.

But she didn’t leave it there, she went full-bore unhinged. She had a fit with Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) saying that the overturning of Roe v. Wade returned the question to the states so that people could decide (which is more democratic). “These are the same states that are stopping people from voting!” she ranted.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1546888359699791875

Exactly who is being stopped from voting in either of those two states? Please point to who is being denied the right to vote. Indeed, as we’ve noted in the past, Democrats spread a lot of false information about the law that was passed in Texas, they even fled the state in a major tantrum but lost spectacularly, because their arguments were just nonsense. The problem, of course, is that they may not have liked that you would have voter ID for mail-in ballots as well as in-person voting.

But Bridges continued down the rabbit hole.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1546913902696480772

 “Do you think that a baby that is not yet born has value?” Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) asked her.
She responded, “I believe that a person with a capacity for pregnancy has value.”
Cornyn observed that she was not answering his question. Her response? “I’m answering a more interesting question to me.”
Oh. Is that how Congressional testimony works now? You just answer the imaginary things that float into your head while the members of Congress twiddle their thumbs and wait for you to land back on Earth? I don’t think that’s the way this works and I’m not sure why Democrats put her forward because it certainly isn’t helping their cause for the midterms when Americans see and hear this kind of testimony. It’s hard to imagine that she teaches people. But this is where Democrats are at this point, pushing nonsensical assertions.


https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/07 ... er-n593554
 
 
 

As with everything else, loony leftists have only premises but no arguments to back them up. And for some reason the people who should be pushing them to argue their point don't do it. Why was this woman, why is anyone who claims men can get pregnant, never asked to name one who has?

Buffalo » 13 Jul 2022, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2022, 5:52 am

More loony **** from dim-0-craps and their apparatchiks:That Senate Abortion Testimony Just Got Even Wackier

By Nick Arama | Jul 12, 2022 5:00 PM ET
  


As we reported previously, the Democrats are making some interesting arguments during a hearing on abortion in the Senate. That is to say, they’re wandering into trainwreck territory with one of the witnesses they put on — Khiara Bridges, who is a law professor at UC Berkeley School of Law.

Bridges accused Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) of being transphobic because he asked if she meant “women” when she used the term “people with a capacity for pregnancy.” The professor then said he was opening up trans people to violence by the nature of his question.

But she didn’t leave it there, she went full-bore unhinged. She had a fit with Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) saying that the overturning of Roe v. Wade returned the question to the states so that people could decide (which is more democratic). “These are the same states that are stopping people from voting!” she ranted.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1546888359699791875

Exactly who is being stopped from voting in either of those two states? Please point to who is being denied the right to vote. Indeed, as we’ve noted in the past, Democrats spread a lot of false information about the law that was passed in Texas, they even fled the state in a major tantrum but lost spectacularly, because their arguments were just nonsense. The problem, of course, is that they may not have liked that you would have voter ID for mail-in ballots as well as in-person voting.

But Bridges continued down the rabbit hole.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1546913902696480772

 “Do you think that a baby that is not yet born has value?” Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) asked her.
She responded, “I believe that a person with a capacity for pregnancy has value.”
Cornyn observed that she was not answering his question. Her response? “I’m answering a more interesting question to me.”
Oh. Is that how Congressional testimony works now? You just answer the imaginary things that float into your head while the members of Congress twiddle their thumbs and wait for you to land back on Earth? I don’t think that’s the way this works and I’m not sure why Democrats put her forward because it certainly isn’t helping their cause for the midterms when Americans see and hear this kind of testimony. It’s hard to imagine that she teaches people. But this is where Democrats are at this point, pushing nonsensical assertions.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/07 ... er-n593554

So in other words. Its ok to abort a baby about to pop out. See- that's what normal people do NOT like.
Nice looking black woman... but she HAD to stick those rings in her nose. bunch of idiots.  

sootedupCyndi » 13 Jul 2022, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2022, 6:00 am

So in other words. Its ok to abort a baby about to pop out. See- that's what normal people do NOT like.
Nice looking black woman... but she HAD to stick those rings in her nose. bunch of idiots.

I thought the EXACT same thing about that ridiculous nose ring!!!