why bring psychological into this? stick to instinctive and intellectual process in the brain. the word mind is simply obedience to power of suggestion a brain is willing to go before instincts pull each individual back from fantasizing life is more than just evolving here as one of a kind.Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ The APA and, other professional organizations, have concluded that gender and biology (or the sex) are different concepts.
Ok, true. But different concepts do not negate connections. Concepts is something that we use to define and categorize nature to make sense of things. However, biology is a science that is fixed. It is possible to separate the concepts of sex and gender. However, it is impossible to disconnect the two. Gender is tied to sex.
For instance, we cannot call a fetus a person. That's why I always use the term human life, instead of person. Personhood is a definition we give to an individual. Therefore, it is possible to separate the concepts of person with fetus. However, can you disconnect person while neglecting the term human life? No. It's impossible. You can have human life while neglecting he term person, but you cannot use personhood while neglecting the term human life.
It is the same with sex and gender. Just as person is tied with human life, gender is tied with sex. It's possible to have two different concepts that are still tied together.
@Blackvegetable that's how it's done. You see how I used thoughts of my own. I didn't copy/paste Google, then turn around and ask 600 questions to everyone else like a coward. Coward. Now die.
Ok sexual polarity of a half life reproduction. Opposites reproduce, same polarities don't. Natural sterilization of fertile lifetimes.
Challenge me to demonstrate that it is illiterate gibberish.Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ The APA and, other professional organizations, have concluded that gender and biology (or the sex) are different concepts.
Ok, true. But different concepts do not negate connections. Concepts is something that we use to define and categorize nature to make sense of things. However, biology is a science that is fixed. It is possible to separate the concepts of sex and gender. However, it is impossible to disconnect the two. Gender is tied to sex.
For instance, we cannot call a fetus a person. That's why I always use the term human life, instead of person. Personhood is a definition we give to an individual. Therefore, it is possible to separate the concepts of person with fetus. However, can you disconnect person while neglecting the term human life? No. It's impossible. You can have human life while neglecting he term person, but you cannot use personhood while neglecting the term human life.
It is the same with sex and gender. Just as person is tied with human life, gender is tied with sex. It's possible to have two different concepts that are still tied together.
@Blackvegetable that's how it's done. You see how I used thoughts of my own. I didn't copy/paste Google, then turn around and ask 600 questions to everyone else like a coward. Coward. Now die.
can you define a man? what is a man these days?
It is misdirection, not gibberish. Same way you communicate.Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Challenge me to demonstrate that it is illiterate gibberish.
Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Challenge me to demonstrate that it is illiterate gibberish.
Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ The APA and, other professional organizations, have concluded that gender and biology (or the sex) are different concepts.
Ok, true. But different concepts do not negate connections. Concepts is something that we use to define and categorize nature to make sense of things. However, biology is a science that is fixed. It is possible to separate the concepts of sex and gender. However, it is impossible to disconnect the two. Gender is tied to sex.
For instance, we cannot call a fetus a person. That's why I always use the term human life, instead of person. Personhood is a definition we give to an individual. Therefore, it is possible to separate the concepts of person with fetus. However, can you disconnect person while neglecting the term human life? No. It's impossible. You can have human life while neglecting he term person, but you cannot use personhood while neglecting the term human life.
It is the same with sex and gender. Just as person is tied with human life, gender is tied with sex. It's possible to have two different concepts that are still tied together.
@Blackvegetable that's how it's done. You see how I used thoughts of my own. I didn't copy/paste Google, then turn around and ask 600 questions to everyone else like a coward. Coward. Now die.
perhaps this syntactical holocaust SHOULD readThe APA and, other professional organizations, have
This is fresh of the feta boat incomprehensible.concluded that gender and biology (or the sex) are different concepts.
Coke....no Pepsi..(or the sex)
Sure...in the sense that a microwave steamer is a tool and broccoli is a vegetable.Ok, true. But different concepts do not negate connections.
To begin with "Concepts" is plural.Concepts is something
But it's "fixedness", though true in an absolute sense, is a matter of what we are able to observe. And that changes with advances in technology.However, biology is a science that is fixed. It is possible to separate the concepts of sex and gender
In a meaninglessly obvious way, yes.Gender is tied to sex
Look at this bucket of vomit.Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑
To begin with "Concepts" is plural.
But it's "fixedness", though true in an absolute sense, is a matter of what we are able to observe. And that changes with advances in technology.
In a meaninglessly obvious way, yes.
Must I continue?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2C_seOSdrEVegas » 12 Jul 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ The APA and, other professional organizations, have concluded that gender and biology (or the sex) are different concepts.
Ok, true. But different concepts do not negate connections. Concepts is something that we use to define and categorize nature to make sense of things. However, biology is a science that is fixed. It is possible to separate the concepts of sex and gender. However, it is impossible to disconnect the two. Gender is tied to sex.
For instance, we cannot call a fetus a person. That's why I always use the term human life, instead of person. Personhood is a definition we give to an individual. Therefore, it is possible to separate the concepts of person with fetus. However, can you disconnect person while neglecting the term human life? No. It's impossible. You can have human life while neglecting he term person, but you cannot use personhood while neglecting the term human life.
It is the same with sex and gender. Just as person is tied with human life, gender is tied with sex. It's possible to have two different concepts that are still tied together.
@Blackvegetable that's how it's done. You see how I used thoughts of my own. I didn't copy/paste Google, then turn around and ask 600 questions to everyone else like a coward. Coward. Now die.
To this point you have been meandering, inarticulately.Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Look at this bucket of vomit.
most of this refutes even one point. This is the only thing ^^^ that came close. But to no avail. Fetus observations change with technology? LOL!![]()
![]()
Brillinat.
And yes, you must continue because you haven't refuted ****. Now try again.
Utterly meaningless.Gender is tied to sex.
I have a sneaking suspicion that this will turn out to be convenient.For instance, we cannot call a fetus a person. That's why I always use the term human life, instead of person
But wait..Personhood is a definition we give to an individual. Therefore, it is possible to separate the concepts of person with fetus.
What if people reject your redefinition? Your problem is of your own making.However, can you disconnect person while neglecting the term human life? No. It's impossible
I would be glad to show you what a man is:
thats sweet but you're married.. ha ha
Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Challenge me to demonstrate that it is illiterate gibberish.
You cannot even correct grammar properly, fruitcake.Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ perhaps this syntactical holocaust SHOULD read
The APA, and other professional organisations, has
No questions, dick sucker.
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ But wait..
What if people reject your redefinition?
Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ No pleading for invitations, dick sucker. Man the **** up and get to work.
The commas are acceptable, but the verb would be singular.Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You cannot even correct grammar properly, fruitcake.
The APA and other professional organisations have - no commas.
No questions, dick sucker.
Yes I am, and I do my best to be a good husband.sootedupCyndi » 12 Jul 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ thats sweet but you're married.. ha ha
and imagine us in the house having a debate dear. We would kill each other.. unless you let me win. lol