Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑ You know damn well that the 'root' of a word is not the same as a 'definition.'
**** your cop-out lying. **** your stalling. **** your cowardice. **** your projections.
Do it now!
Take any definition of gender you wish, any definition. I couldn't care less, just choose one. Got one? Good. Now, give that definition without referring to a man or a woman in the context of sex.
Now, give that definition without referring to a man or a woman in the context of sex.
No, Vegas....trust me....you're a moron....Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Enough! Everyone grows weary of your cop-outs. You are a coward at an unprecedented level.
Now coward. Do it. No roots. Give definition. Now.
Take any definition of gender you wish, any definition. I couldn't care less, just choose one. Got one? Good. Now, give that definition without referring to a man or a woman in the context of sex.
Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Vegas....trust me....you're a moron....
I mean it...
Did you actually GRADUATE from college?
Can you give a working example of stupidity that doesn't have exemptions or exceptions among the 4 generations fooled already thinking they got away fooling the last generation arriving?
Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ The commas are acceptable, but the verb would be singular.
I did not ask about "categories," lady. I very SPECIFICALLY asked about human sexes - and a weak queer tried to muddy the waters and pretend he didn't duck the question.
Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I did not ask about "categories," lady. I very SPECIFICALLY asked about human sexes - and a weak queer tried to muddy the waters and pretend he didn't duck the question.
Biology recognizes two human sexes, ***. Two - full stop. Male and female.
The rest is just more sissy talk from a panty dancer.
And THAT is why you get to ask no questions, dick sucker.
Where does biology do this?Biology recognizes two human sexes, ***. Two - full stop. Male and female.
No....You're wrongCannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The commas muddy the water - just the way you like things, fruitcake.
No questions, dick sucker.
That's what I figured.
Your obsession with gender & fetuses is scaring me, should the forum members be worried?Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ The APA , and other professional organizations, have concluded that gender and biology (or the sex) are different concepts.
Ok, true. But different concepts do not negate connections. Concepts is something that we use to define and categorize nature to make sense of things. However, biology is a science that is fixed. It is possible to separate the concepts of sex and gender. However, it is impossible to disconnect the two. Gender is tied to sex.
For instance, we cannot call a fetus a person. That's why I always use the term human life, instead of person. Personhood is a definition we give to an individual. Therefore, it is possible to separate the concepts of person with fetus. However, can you disconnect person while neglecting the term human life? No. It's impossible. You can have human life while neglecting he term person, but you cannot use personhood while neglecting the term human life.
It is the same with sex and gender. Just as person is tied with human life, gender is tied with sex. It's possible to have two different concepts that are still tied together.
@Blackvegetable that's how it's done. You see how I used thoughts of my own. I didn't copy/paste Google, then turn around and ask 600 questions to everyone else like a coward. Coward. Now die.
RevolutionaryKing » 12 Jul 2022, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Your obsession with gender & fetuses is scaring me, should the forum members be worried?
Life only evolves forward now, without relative time theory, naturally changing total sum here constantly balancing ancestrally forward here where ever you exist geographically and geometrically present as conceived to decomposed corpse your time living is never same details twice.Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑ The commas muddy the water - just the way you like things, fruitcake.
They spent the last couple decades assuring people that they were talking about gender roles. That biological men should be free to dress as women dress without reprisal. Not that these were women but that they were men who chose to identify with the female gender role. The trans women are women thing is a fairly recent phenomenon. Trans women are men who choose to ape social gender roles, dress, and appearance of women.Vegas » 12 Jul 2022, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll save @Blackvegetable the time because we all know what his response will be: "This is your assertion."![]()
![]()
He thinks that biology based sex is an opinion.
Neo » 13 Jul 2022, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ They spent the last couple decades assuring people that they were talking about gender roles. That biological men should be free to dress as women dress without reprisal. Not that these were women but that they were men who chose to identify with the female gender role. The trans women are women thing is a fairly recent phenomenon. Trans women are men who choose to ape social gender roles, dress, and appearance of women.
Who are "they", QaNeonRube?They spent the last couple decades assuring people that they were talking about gender roles.