Neither are you.Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ You may take it as such....but it's really just a necessary reality check.
You're not a virologist, or lawyer......you've never even played one...
Please don't presume to "know".Cedar » 13 Jul 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither are you.
But let's look at what we do know.
1) Liz can't prove Trump knew this person was a "witness"
2) We don't know Trumps relationship to the "witness."
3) This "witness" didn't take the call.
4) Liz doesn't know why Trump placed the call.
What exactly do you think you have?
Evidence is subjective interpretation of actual events usually projected with specific objectives for a specific outcome that doesn't arrive naturally here. Like tomorrow.Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2022, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ I have....repeatedly....
I've even provided evidence.
You?
Cedar » 13 Jul 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ You acquiesced that gender and sex are different concepts, they aren't. If you are born with a penis your biological sex is male, your gender is male. Period.
This is why your wife prefers my cock. You’re fickle.Vegas » 13 Jul 2022, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I showed that gender and sex are tied together. Did you even read the OP?
Look a guy named 'John money'....unironicsally his name...was the first to use the word gender as somehow tied to biological sex. In the 1970s.Vegas » 13 Jul 2022, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I showed that gender and sex are tied together. Did you even read the OP?
Stay at home parent.
Bigotry is nurtured to obey social consensus or else. Abusing power of suggestion collectively. "We know who we become, who are you(anyone questioning mob rule) to question that?".Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2022, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Stay at home parent.
Women do that - not men. Men are not nurturers and nest builders. Women are.
When a man plays stay at home dad and the wife works, that is a man bites dog situation. People notice. Questions are axed - judgments are made.
Dude...lol...Vegas is basically on your side. This is This is linguistic argument which is pretty funny cause gender is a linguistic term...originally
Neither are you, *** - did not stop you from playing vax nazi, control freak.
Nice panty dance.
What exactly do you think you have?
Biology is the creating conceptions. society does the nurturing of other people's children to blame their former ancestry for all the things going wrong today.Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2022, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Biology is nurtured to give you a big glass of shut the **** up, fruity.
FOS » 13 Jul 2022, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Look a guy named 'John money'....unironicsally his name...was the first to use the word gender as somehow tied to biological sex. In the 1970s.
It was pretty stupid. Carl Jung had already approached many of these subjects...and named animus as the repressed masculine drive of a woman, and Anima as the repressed feminine drive of a man. And actually was quote similar to the esoteric fascist philosopher Julius evola on these topics.
Now what the word gender has BECOME is a weird spiritual category which is first and foremost UNMEASURABLE.
Meaning it has no scientific merit. It is religion...theology.
And here's a funny punchline. The guy who started using the term 'gender' (previously restricted to linguistics)...tried to use it to promote some philosophy of 'testosterone supremacy.'. No joke. He suggested a woman with more testosterone than a man was superior to that man.
**** crazy ehat you discover when you dig into the history of this ****.
No. That isn't how it works at all.omh » 13 Jul 2022, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Biology is the creating conceptions. society does the nurturing of other people's children to blame their former ancestry for all the things going wrong today.
I know. As I said, he was the first to use it outside a linguistic concept.Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2022, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ He may have used the word in a revolutionary way - but he didn't invent it.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=origin+of ... =0&ghacc=0
FOS » 13 Jul 2022, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Look a guy named 'John money'....unironicsally his name...was the first to use the word gender as somehow tied to biological sex. In the 1970s.
It was pretty stupid. Carl Jung had already approached many of these subjects...and named animus as the repressed masculine drive of a woman, and Anima as the repressed feminine drive of a man. And actually was quote similar to the esoteric fascist philosopher Julius evola on these topics.
Now what the word gender has BECOME is a weird spiritual category which is first and foremost UNMEASURABLE.
Meaning it has no scientific merit. It is religion...theology.
And here's a funny punchline. The guy who started using the term 'gender' (previously restricted to linguistics)...tried to use it to promote some philosophy of 'testosterone supremacy.'. No joke. He suggested a woman with more testosterone than a man was superior to that man.
**** crazy ehat you discover when you dig into the history of this ****.
Let me correct biology is the study of genetic continuation within the food chain to categorize life into literal terminology for discussions between people living in series parallel ancestral displacement here now. most often 5 generation limit where great great grandparents might meet their great great grandchildren before dying.Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2022, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑ No. That isn't how it works at all.
The spicy haired Norwegians EAT the falafel - that is a fact. I seen it out my winder.