Liberal Forum

roadkill » 30 Aug 2022, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2022, 8:39 am

They had a patent on the virus...

https://media.gab.com/system/media_atta ... d3944c.mp4

Huh. You can only patent things created by humans - nothing naturally occuring.

Huh.

That *** ****** @Ike Bana  will just run away from this information.

He runs a good bit, for a mouthy little ***. 
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2022, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2022, 7:06 pm

Huh. You can only patent things created by humans - nothing naturally occuring.

Huh.

That *** ****** @Ike Bana  will just run away from this information.

He runs a good bit, for a mouthy little ***.

 

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines. ... l-therapy/

roadkill » 15 Aug 2022, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2022, 6:25 am

That thing looks like one of BVs aborted children.
 

DeplorablePatriot » 01 Sep 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2022, 11:47 am

That thing looks like one of BVs aborted children.

I think they call it the Bvariant.      

The vaccine is great! I have relatives who have contracted the "RONA" three times since the jab.
**** Biden, **** Dr. Death, **** demorats!

IkeBana » 05 Sep 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2022, 10:10 am

So says the "Covid-19 Forum".  The most notable spewer of pandemic disinformation on planet earth.

Shamelessly spewing lies when you are well aware that the Covid-19 Forum is primarily composed of copy and pasted articles and videos by and about world renowned epidemiologists, virologists, microbiologists, pathologists, immunologists, vaccinologists and particularly, talented, dedicated, front line treating physicians, that have enjoyed 99+% success rates in early treatment of elderly and high-risk individuals ever since March of 2020.
Like for example:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/about/t ... hysicians/

But then we all recognize you're just one of the ignorant dupes that lost his mind in the Mass Formation Psychosis.

You also know the leaky, escape mutant creating, non-"vaccines" are not credited with preventing the receiving or transmitting of COVID-19, but are only credited with reducing symptoms - even to the extent of no symptoms. So anybody that isn't completely absent a capacity for critical thought can easily recognize that the vaxxed have been and continue to be the true asymptomatic stealth super-spreaders of COVID-19 or "granny killers".

While the unvaxxed never were, and continue not to be, spreaders of COVID-19 unless we are symptomatic. Then we simply take $10 worth of 100% effective generic drugs and nutraceuticals, and stay away from granny until we are better.
In 2020 there was essentially no chance of asymptomatic COVID spread

https://youtu.be/NQTBlbx1Xjs

https://youtu.be/PK5PZ-jxVfo
 

DeplorablePatriot » 01 Sep 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2022, 11:47 am

That thing looks like one of BVs aborted children.

     
 

...we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm:

per Covid-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable.

University booster mandates are unethical because:

1. no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 
2. vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;
3. mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;
4. US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and
5. mandates create wider social harms.

We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialisation and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our analysis for current 2-dose Covid-19 vaccine mandates in North America.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm ... id=4206070

The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study

We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2219/htm
 

IkeBana » 20 Jul 2022, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 7:32 am

SJConspirator » 18 Jul 2022, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2022, 8:41 pm

Four jabs hmm you will be dead in a couple years from myocarditisl and heart failure

Myocarditis (or pericarditis or myopericarditis) from primary COVID19 infection occurred at a rate as high as 450 per million in young males. Young males infected with the virus are up 6 times more likely to develop myocarditis as those who have received the vaccine.

GeorgeWashington » 11 Sep 2022, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2022, 4:33 pm

The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study

We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2219/htm

"It does indeed take a big man to say I'm sorry

https://media.gab.com/system/media_atta ... 691398.mp4
 
 

roadkill » 12 Sep 2022, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2022, 7:39 am

"It does indeed take a big man to say I'm sorry

https://media.gab.com/system/media_atta ... 691398.mp4
 
 

seeking forgiveness and keep on behaving the same way after forgiven shows a corrupt individual will always stay true to their shared beliefs actual life cannot be socially understood by any group think saving humanity forward while genetics eternally separates active reproductions alive here now.

GeorgeWashington » 15 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm

https://mobile.twitter.com/Roman_Baber/ ... 4648953856
 —————
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them

The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible. The decrease in immunity can be caused by several factors such as N1-methylpseudouridine, the spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, antibody-dependent enhancement, and the original antigenic stimulus. These clinical alterations may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles. As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued. In addition, the date of vaccination should be recorded in the medical record of patients.

https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/art ... 22-01831-0

There have been sooo many negative reports, studies, and warnings that surfaced about the vaccine and the boosters, yet we are still urged to take both.

Goodgrief » 12 Sep 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2022, 2:56 pm

There have been sooo many negative reports, studies, and warnings that surfaced about the vaccine and the boosters, yet we are still urged to take both.

I feel like I dodged a bullet. I am on record here as having been vaxxed because of the people around me.
I did it because I didn't find the risk of either the virus OR the vax to be more than marginal. 
Since I feared neither enough to care, I did it for others around me.

The risks of the disease were pretty well known at the time. Pretty low.
But people were irrational about it. Fueled by hyperbole.

Now we are seeing, in spite of propaganda, results over time of the vax.
I say this knowing the entire **** of data and statistics has been tainted.

Having had no side effects that I'm aware of, I feel like I dodged a bullet. So far...
 

DeezerShoove » 13 Sep 2022, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2022, 7:56 am

I feel like I dodged a bullet. I am on record here as having been vaxxed because of the people around me.
I did it because I didn't find the risk of either the virus OR the vax to be more than marginal. 
Since I feared neither enough to care, I did it for others around me.

The risks of the disease were pretty well known at the time. Pretty low.
But people were irrational about it. Fueled by hyperbole.

Now we are seeing, in spite of propaganda, results over time of the vax.
I say this knowing the entire **** of data and statistics has been tainted.

Having had no side effects that I'm aware of, I feel like I dodged a bullet. So far...

If I were you, I would be doing some serious googling, looking for credible, peer-reviewed clinical advice for the vaxxed. I am not sure PRECISELY how to target the search, but you might begin with, "What if I did something truly retarded and suicidal" - and then proceed to narrow your search from there. I'm sure, "You're vaxed, aren't ya" will be in the top five...

Personally I think you should bee on a chelation regime. You can do it with diet or with supplements or both. 
 

Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm

If I were you, I would be doing some serious googling, looking for credible, peer-reviewed clinical advice for the vaxxed. I am not sure PRECISELY how to target the search, but you might begin with, "What if I did something truly retarded and suicidal" - and then proceed to narrow your search from there. I'm sure, "You're vaxed, aren't ya" will be in the top five...

Personally I think you should bee on a chelation regime. You can do it with diet or with supplements or both.

Try this instead of Google...

https://search.brave.com/
 

Corrupt fools...

https://media.gab.com/system/media_atta ... a375e1.mp4
 

roadkill » 13 Sep 2022, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2022, 3:56 pm

Try this instead of Google...

https://search.brave.com/

I usually google on duckduckgo, but I'll give that a shot.