Liberal Forum

Ep. 60 Is the lesson of the Covid disaster that we should give its architects more power? Bret Weinstein on the WHO’s plans for you. pic.twitter.com/ku3O5BdeoF

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) January 5, 2024

https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/2024 ... ore-power/
 
 

France Raises Alarm over ‘Very Disturbing’ Spike in Sudden Deaths of Babies Since Introduction of New RSV Vaccine

Independent researchers discovered a “very alarming” and “disturbing” spike in newborn deaths in France coinciding with the rollout of vaccines for infants. This increase, the researchers said, coincides with the introduction of Beyfortus RSV vaccine in French hospitals, which began on Sept. 15, 2023. The drug is offered as a “one-time shot for infants born just before or during the RSV season and for those less than 8 months old before the season starts,” and for some high-risk 8- to 19-month-old infants.”

French researchers have raised the alarm over the “abnormal” and “improbably high rate” of sudden deaths among newborn babies in France.

Independent researchers discovered a “very alarming” and “disturbing” spike in newborn deaths in France coinciding with the rollout of vaccines for infants.

French researchers identified possible safety signals in babies coinciding with the rollout of Beyfortus, a recently approved monoclonal antibody treatment for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in newborns.

The discovery comes as public health authorities ramp up warnings about the spread of respiratory viruses and step up their promotion of the drug.

In interviews with The Defender, the researchers — French independent scientist and author Hélène Banoun, Ph.D., and French statistician Christine Mackoi — explained that data from France’s National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE) indicates an improbably high rate of deaths of babies between 2 and 6 days old in France during September and October 2023.

INSEE is the authority that compiles official birth and death data in France.

This increase, the researchers said, coincides with the introduction of Beyfortus in French hospitals, which began on Sept. 15, 2023.

In an interview with cardiologist Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, Banoun said that over 200,000 newborn babies in France have been injected with Beyfortus since that date.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended Beyfortus in August 2023, while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) authorized the drug in September 2022.

Beyfortus was developed jointly by AstraZeneca and Sanofi.

French researchers and other medical experts warned that no long-term studies have been conducted involving Beyfortus and newborns and that the administration of monoclonal antibodies on this population is unprecedented.

We need long term studies. We need data. Our babies are not guinea pigs.

https://gellerreport.com/2024/01/france ... cine.html/
 

“ We need long term studies. We need data. Our babies are not guinea pigs.”

Killers don’t want data. Those trusting killers don’t want data either.

GeorgeWashington » 15 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm

https://mobile.twitter.com/Roman_Baber/ ... 4648953856
 —————
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them

The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible. The decrease in immunity can be caused by several factors such as N1-methylpseudouridine, the spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, antibody-dependent enhancement, and the original antigenic stimulus. These clinical alterations may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles. As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued. In addition, the date of vaccination should be recorded in the medical record of patients.

https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/art ... 22-01831-0

https://www.newsnationnow.com/health/hy ... 00-deaths/Study: Hydroxychloroquine may have caused nearly 17,000 deaths

R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2024, 8:18 am

https://www.newsnationnow.com/health/hy ... 00-deaths/Study: Hydroxychloroquine may have caused nearly 17,000 deaths

A click-bait meta-study designed for the echo chamber from an online, open access journal with an SJR rank of 1.366. By contrast. JAMA (which would never consider this paper for publication) ranks 6.695. Science Direct charges a fee of $3360.00 to publish. I recall YOU laughing down a study in your BeeVee persona PRECISELY because its authors paid to publish. 

The first line of the abstract from the no-reputation online journal "science direct":

During the first wave of COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was used off-label despite the absence of evidence documenting its clinical benefits.

Hundreds of doctors treated tens of thousands with no evidence for the effectiveness of HCQ? That COULD NOT HAPPEN. The idea that scores of hospitals in half a dozen countries would blithely produce minimum cohorts of above 500 persons with no evidence is preposterous.

This is from ResearchGate (rated high credibility and pro-science by media bias fact check), declaring HCQ safe & effective against Covid: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxVie ... d-Safe.pdf. It preceded your study by 3&1/2 years. So the first line of the abstract is knowingly false. There IS a case for HCQ, contrary to your cite's OPENING claim. Hundreds of actual doctors agree.

Your study gives no standardized measure of the reliability of the data used - with cause: The study repackaged dozens of variable-credibility studies in precisely the same way brokers packaged mortgage swaps in the Shrub years.

Another glaring issue: 5 of the 6 authors (including the lead) had a CLEAR duty to report a conflict - to wit, that their university departments are funded in large part by the very drug companies which profit from covid treatments with active patents - profits threatened by generic HCQ. It is an enormous ethical lapse not to list these conflicts - extremely basic duties to which only the hackiest journals would EVER turn a blind eye. 

Worse still, your article's study  fails to mention that HCQ was only used as a hail mary on patients already deemed terminal. 

Let's look at your study's pedestrian, agenda-driven conclusion:

Although our estimates are limited by their imprecision, these findings illustrate the hazard of drug repurposing with low-level evidence.

The death percentage attributed to HCQ in the WORST of the cases cited (Spain) was .291. According to pandemic enthusiasts, the Covid mortality rate is at or above .3%.

When the cure fails to save EVERYONE dying from the disease, the time for hand-wringing is NOT nigh. People who were dying anyway (median age of cohort 65 - the highest risk cohort) still dying is not TRULY an indictment of HCQ, kid. It was still COVID - not HCQ - that killed them. HCQ's crime is that it did not SAVE them.

And on top of ALL this, we on this board are Ivermectin enthusiasts, fruitcake. And the WHO says that Ivermectin is a WONDER DRUG for its reputation as one of the safest drugs in history, and for its ever-growing reputation as a prodigious off label weapon against multiple human ailments from parasite infestation to Rosacea to now-proven anti-viral applications. And you're on record calling it horse dewormer, you clown.

Your study is low-integrity yellow-science click-bait designed for the echo chamber, kid. 

 
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Jan 2024, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2024, 5:34 pm

A click-bait meta-study designed for the echo chamber from an online, open access journal with an SJR rank of 1.366. By contrast. JAMA (which would never consider this paper for publication) ranks 6.695. Science Direct charges a fee of $3360.00 to publish. I recall YOU laughing down a study in your BeeVee persona PRECISELY because its authors paid to publish. 

The first line of the abstract from the no-reputation online journal "science direct":

Hundreds of doctors treated tens of thousands with no evidence for the effectiveness of HCQ? That COULD NOT HAPPEN. The idea that scores of hospitals in half a dozen countries would blithely produce minimum cohorts of above 500 persons with no evidence is preposterous.

This is from ResearchGate (rated high credibility and pro-science by media bias fact check), declaring HCQ safe & effective against Covid: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxVie ... d-Safe.pdf. It preceded your study by 3&1/2 years. So the first line of the abstract is knowingly false. There IS a case for HCQ, contrary to your cite's OPENING claim. Hundreds of actual doctors agree.

Your study gives no standardized measure of the reliability of the data used - with cause: The study repackaged dozens of variable-credibility studies in precisely the same way brokers packaged mortgage swaps in the Shrub years.

Another glaring issue: 5 of the 6 authors (including the lead) had a CLEAR duty to report a conflict - to wit, that their university departments are funded in large part by the very drug companies which profit from covid treatments with active patents - profits threatened by generic HCQ. It is an enormous ethical lapse not to list these conflicts - extremely basic duties to which only the hackiest journals would EVER turn a blind eye. 

Worse still, your article's study  fails to mention that HCQ was only used as a hail mary on patients already deemed terminal. 

Let's look at your study's pedestrian, agenda-driven conclusion:

The death percentage attributed to HCQ in the WORST of the cases cited (Spain) was .291. According to pandemic enthusiasts, the Covid mortality rate is at or above .3%.

When the cure fails to save EVERYONE dying from the disease, the time for hand-wringing is NOT nigh. People who were dying anyway (median age of cohort 65 - the highest risk cohort) still dying is not TRULY an indictment of HCQ, kid. It was still COVID - not HCQ - that killed them. HCQ's crime is that it did not SAVE them.

And on top of ALL this, we on this board are Ivermectin enthusiasts, fruitcake. And the WHO says that Ivermectin is a WONDER DRUG for its reputation as one of the safest drugs in history, and for its ever-growing reputation as a prodigious off label weapon against multiple human ailments from parasite infestation to Rosacea to now-proven anti-viral applications. And you're on record calling it horse dewormer, you clown.

Your study is low-integrity yellow-science click-bait designed for the echo chamber, kid.

BlaVe aka Swerve is a desperate attention whore lacking even the most basic moral ethic to appear honest. His agenda trumps all other considerations except perhaps his desire to be a Chatroom Champ. "Winning" here is important enough to need a sok to shed his previously failed phony-quest.
 

Damning New Evidence Emerges Regarding Covid-19 Origins, Secret Meetings Revealed

https://wltreport.com/2024/01/09/damnin ... 9-origins/

Fauci flip flops during Congress grilling: Ex-White House doctor ducks more than 100 questions about Covid and admits he approved risky Wuhan coronavirus research proposal without reading it

• House GOP said Fauci's pandemic policies full of drastic and systemic failures
• He 'backtracked' on past claims his agency never funded gain of function abroad
• READ MORE:  Fauci grilled by Congress during two marathon 7-hour sessions

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... ng-it.html

Majik » 10 Jan 2024, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 7:59 am

Damning New Evidence Emerges Regarding Covid-19 Origins, Secret Meetings Revealed

https://wltreport.com/2024/01/09/damnin ... 9-origins/

Hey, I found ugly stuff down that tunnel - had a virus called norton try to take my over.
 

Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 9:18 am

Hey, I found ugly stuff down that tunnel - had a virus called norton try to take my over.

What kind of virus?

 

Majik » 10 Jan 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 11:32 am

What kind of virus?

Just norton taking over - I immediately closed the window.
 

Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2024, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2024, 11:42 am

Just norton taking over - I immediately closed the window.

Alright ...
I'm going to scan the link .
thanks.
 

R.Suave » 07 Jan 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2024, 8:18 am

https://www.newsnationnow.com/health/hy ... 00-deaths/Study: Hydroxychloroquine may have caused nearly 17,000 deaths

Ha ha ha you are truly one dumb SOB! "May" from some leftard bot retard programming rag! What a retard. The reality is Hydroxychloroquine is one of the most used drugs ever by more people in human history. It and it's precursor have been used to treat and prevent malaria for 100 years, billions of doses. It's safety is beyond question. Same for Ivermectin.


By the way your link is restricted from European nations, why false information..........you stupid ****.

SHOCKING – 15 COVID “Conspiracy Theories” That Turned Out to Be True

The links for all articles are below for reference. The more educated you are on the scam that continues to be used by the Deep State and WEF globally (Democrats – obviously in the US) , the more likely you will never fall for their lies again, no matter how many fake events they throw at you.

#15 – Repeated COVID shots weaken the immune system, according to study.

#14 – Ivermectin worked! Peer-reviewed study finds 74% reduction in excess deaths.

#13 – The unvaccinated were scapegoated for failure of COVID vaccines, study finds.

#12 – Mask wearers paradoxically had an increased risk of contracting COVID.

#11 – Natural immunity proves to be seven times more protective than vaccinated immunity.

#10 – Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.

#9 – Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made.

#8 –New-found emails prove Biden White House hid COVID-19 vaccine harms from the public.

#7 – The COVID shots were not the only toxic measure forced on humanity. Regular mask-wearing was also harmful.

#6 – Nearly 1 in 3 COVID vaccine recipients suffered neurological side effects.

#5 – Research finds heart anomalies within 48 hours after the COVID-19 shot.

#4 – Pfizer hid nearly 80% of COVID-19 vaccine trial deaths from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.

#3 – Perverse brainwashing techniques were thoroughly studied to get you jabbed.

#2 – The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials. There was a “bait-and-switch.”

#1 – Florida’s Surgeon General has called for a halt to the use of all COVID-19 mRNA injections, citing safety concerns after the discovery of billions of DNA fragments per dose in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines.

Continued ...

The Links:
#15 – Repeated COVID shots weaken the immune system, according to study. Epoch Times

#14 – Ivermectin worked! Peer-reviewed study finds 74% reduction in excess deaths. – Vigilant News

#13 – The unvaccinated were scapegoated for failure of COVID vaccines, study finds. – Vigilant News

#12 – Mask wearers paradoxically had an increased risk of contracting COVID. – Epoch Times

#11 – Natural immunity proves to be seven times more protective than vaccinated immunity. – Epoch Times

#10 – Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action. – Vigilant News

#9 – Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made. – Epoch Times

#8 – New-found emails prove Biden White House hid COVID-19 vaccine harms from the public. – Vigilant News

#7 – The COVID shots were not the only toxic measure forced on humanity. Regular mask-wearing was also harmful. – Vigilant News

#6 – Nearly 1 in 3 COVID vaccine recipients suffered neurological side effects. Epoch Times

#5 – Research finds heart anomalies within 48 hours after the COVID-19 shot. Epoch Times

#4 – Pfizer hid nearly 80% of COVID-19 vaccine trial deaths from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization. – Vigilant News

#3 – Perverse brainwashing techniques were thoroughly studied to get you jabbed. – Vigilant News

#2 – The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials. There was a “bait-and-switch.” – Vigilant News

#1 – Florida’s Surgeon General has called for a halt to the use of all COVID-19 mRNA injections, citing safety concerns after the discovery of billions of DNA fragments per dose in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. – Vigilant News

Former vice president at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon: “You have to be brave now”. We’re in the middle of the biggest crime in history. I believe that we can have off the worst crimes in history by actively withdrawing our consent and definitely not accepting these digital ID for any reason. Any reason！”

https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/2024 ... o-be-true/
 

Great postings, Majik

The mask and jab *** can STFU

As the title says..

 

https://youtu.be/rycnayQuazQ

What a retarded thread.  @sooted up Cyndi   said i should look at it.  I did.  I didn't find any peer reviewed studies.  Not one.  You idiots can't even fill one page with peer reviewed studies.  Hell, you can't find one.    

actionjackson » 12 Jan 2024, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2024, 7:53 pm

What a retarded thread.  @sooted up Cyndi   said i should look at it.  I did.  I didn't find any peer reviewed studies.  Not one.  You idiots can't even fill one page with peer reviewed studies.  Hell, you can't find one.  

All you can do is to hide behind fraudulent "peer review".
Plus....
You're the same brainwashed moron who believes that SS ****** have contributed just as much to the advance of mankind as everyone else...!!!

 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Jan 2024, 1:14 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2024, 1:14 am

All you can do is to hide behind fraudulent "peer review".
Plus....
You're the same brainwashed moron who believes that SS ****** have contributed just as much to the advance of mankind as everyone else...!!!

Maybe I should read 94 pages of RWNJ sites.