Liberal Forum

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Feb 2024, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2024, 8:37 pm

Because I favor what...?
Tell me what it is that you think I favor. you cowardly, question dodging piece of ****...? 
I will wait right here for your reply.    

Look at this nut.  I didn't answer him post-haste, and he follows me to another thread.  




-

 

JAE » 08 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm

Look at this nut.  I didn't answer him post-haste, and he follows me to another thread.  

-

Another lie from you.
You were too much of a cowardly piece of ****  to answer me at all.     

maineman » 08 Feb 2024, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 1:09 pm

I did.  You specifically asked about cousins twice removed.  I do not know of the existence, identity, or health status of any cousins twice removed.  You specifically asked about them.

omg your deceased relatives from Chyna virus WTF were they obese? Other conditions?

actionjackson » 08 Feb 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 2:43 pm

Look at this imbecile cannonpoint. He's spending his entire life posting 6 dozen posts with bibliographies!

               

He crucified the **** outta you, while increasing valuable knowledge for the forum
 
 

Tempest62 » 08 Feb 2024, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 4:35 pm

He crucified the **** outta you, while increasing valuable knowledge for the forum

He certainly did....
 

BuckNaked » 08 Feb 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 4:30 pm

omg your deceased relatives from Chyna virus WTF were they obese? Other conditions?

one I have no idea, the other was a regular sized MAGA moron with a red hat and a pickup truck

Tempest62 » 08 Feb 2024, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 4:35 pm

He crucified the **** outta you, while increasing valuable knowledge for the forum

I stuffed the punk, is what I did - in his own thread. 

He is dragging his butt hurt from it into this thread. 

He demanded peer reviewed science. I gave him over a thousand links to peer reviewed case studies of vax injuries, destroying his OP. He responded by insisting it was not peer reviewed science but a bibliography. And I think he actually believed that.

Later - after clicking the links, perhaps, and discovering that lie was not going to float, - he desperately claimed that it WAS peer reviewed science, but some of them favored his OP. So I clicked on one of those he said favored his OP and copy-pasted it. Of course, it did not favor the fruitcake's OP.

He appears to have abandoned his own thread in favor of boohooing in this one.  
 

The Covid Booster Cancer Time Bomb

https://dailysceptic.org/2024/02/08/the ... time-bomb/

How We Can Stop The WHO's Horrific Pandemic Treaty
Reviewing exactly what is inside the worst treaty of our lifetime and the heroic efforts that are stopping it.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how- ... s-horrific

A must read for all Americans .....

Majik » 12 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm

How We Can Stop The WHO's Horrific Pandemic Treaty
Reviewing exactly what is inside the worst treaty of our lifetime and the heroic efforts that are stopping it.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how- ... s-horrific

A must read for all Americans .....

Be honest about evolving in plain sight is how one resists it. Corrupting everyone so far took 7,000 years to get society where it is today.

change what a person minds resets honesty back to knowing the different between evolving as displaced and evolution reached tomorrow.

GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Feb 2024, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2024, 1:40 pm

Another lie from you.
You were too much of a cowardly piece of ****  to answer me at all.   

 
 

maineman » 07 Feb 2024, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2024, 10:24 pm

Your failure to understand the fact that the way we create vaccines has changed since Edward Jenner found one for cowpox is a fault you choose not to cure..  Recombinant DNA may be a new process.  But it is no longer an "experiment" in vaccine creation any more than the Model T was an experiment in the methods of wagon motivation.  Again.  I am fine.  My blood work is also fantastic.  My BP was 120/70 last month.  All my kids are fine and in fabulous physical condition.  My cousin once removed?  His death's silver lining was that it deepened the gene pool.

OF COURSE YOU HAVE AN UNVACCINATED  COUSIN WHO DIED FROM CV19 [even though it was a 2300 to 1 chance that your 60 and older cousin died from CV19]...after all this IS the internet where these MIRACULOUS COINCIDENCES HAPPEN EVERY SINGLE **** TIME...IT JUST NEVER FAILS. ESPECIALLY WITH PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO ARE WELL KNOWN SERIAL LIARS...!!!


 

GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Feb 2024, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2024, 5:55 pm

OF COURSE YOU HAVE AN UNVACCINATED  COUSIN WHO DIED FROM CV19 [even though it was a 2300 to 1 chance that your 60 and older cousin died from CV19]...after all this IS the internet where these MIRACULOUS COINCIDENCES HAPPEN EVERY SINGLE **** TIME...IT JUST NEVER FAILS. ESPECIALLY WITH PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO ARE WELL KNOWN SERIAL LIARS...!!!

The funny thing is, I actually DO know several people who have died from the vax. 

Their body their choice? I don't think so. They were bullied - and as much as I despise their weakness, I despise the bullies far more. 

Story at a Glance:•“Preventing” pandemics is one of the most lucrative areas in medicine. Unfortunately, despite all the money this industry has received, it has only made the problem worse. This is because most pandemics are the result of lab leaks from “preventative” research, and because whenever an effective solution is discovered for a pandemic, it gets suppressed by the industry since so many business interests depend upon profiting off of an “unsolvable emergency.”

•The way COVID-19 was handled was so egregious that it woke much of the public up to this grift. Because of that, the pandemic-industrial complex is now facing an existential risk to its business model (since much of the general population no longer is willing to go along with it).

•To solve this problem, a covert WHO treaty has been put together behind the scenes which gives these international health agencies absolute control over anything related to an alleged “health emergency,” and in turn enshrines each awful policy which was conducted throughout COVID-19 (e.g., mass censorship or the promotion of dangerous and experimental vaccines).

•A grass roots activist movement has accomplished something remarkable—despite the fact every single large organization has pushed the pandemic treaty through, in only a few short months, those activists have begun to derail it. I believe stopping this power grab is one of the most important issues of our time, and this article was written to explain exactly what they are doing so that each of us can help be a part of making sure this abhorrent treaty is never ratified.There is a longstanding problem of natural and non-natural diseases leaking (or being deliberately released) from biolabs. These leaks are quite common and periodically, leaks with grave consequences occur (e.g., RSV, H1N1, HIV, Smallpox, Anthrax, Lyme, SARS, Ebola and SARS-CoV-2 [the virus which caused COVID-19]). Remarkably, prior to the unprecedented censorship of COVID-19, scientists actively spoke out against weaponizing viruses in labs (known as gain of function or GoF research) and in response to public pressure, in 2014 Obama banned it, but only for 3 types of viruses: SARS, MERS and bird flu.
Note: bacteria diseases (e.g., Lyme and anthrax) are sometimes weaponized as well, but these actions are typically not associated with the term “GoF.”In the first part of this series, I attempted to shed light on the vast pandemic “prevention” industry that the world’s eyes were opened to during COVID-19.Briefly, to summarize that article, this racket:•Has convinced the world that we face an existential risk of a dangerous new infectious disease jumping from wild animals to the human population and then wiping out humanity.•Has pivoted to trying to convince the world that the root cause of the increasing frequency of these diseases is not their leaky biolabs, but rather climate change and human encroachment on nature.

 
 

•Uses the fear of a pandemic that might wipe out humanity to justify invasive surveillance of every aspect of our lives and drum up a lot of money to “fix” the problem. That money is then spent on scouring the world for potentially dangerous diseases (after which animals infected with them will be brought back to labs) developing countermeasures for these pathogens, and performing genetic engineering (GoF) on existing viral diseases to make them more deadly in order to be able to better understand how future pandemic viruses might behave.

Note: as discussed in the first of the half of this series, once a pandemic actually emerges, the effective countermeasures that were developed (e.g., hydroxychloroquine for SARS) typically never see the light of day as anything which “ends” a pandemic (rather than just marginally treating it) destroys the lucrative sales market created by the pandemic—which is unacceptable for the medical-industrial complex.In short (like many other areas in medicine), the pandemic racket actually creates the problem it exists to “fix,” and typically fails to even do that because its focus is always on how to make as much money as possible rather than solving the problem.Fortunately, things are starting to change because much of the public now recognizes how egregious the COVID-19 response was. For example:

•Everyday citizens are aware COVID-19 came from GoF research in Wuhan.

•They saw how bad policies were repeatedly propped up (e.g., remdesivir and lockdowns) while good ones were buried (e.g., all the off-patent therapies which effectively treated COVID-19).

•Polling has repeatedly shown roughly half of America believes the vaccines were unsafe and ineffective, while a quarter directly know someone (e.g., themselves) who had a significant injury they attribute to the vaccines.

•Many can now see the trillions we spent on the COVID-19 response produced a result which was actually worse than doing absolutely nothing (best demonstrated by the WHO’s finding that the less countries complied with their instructions, the lower the COVID-19 death rates were—which is truly remarkable given that the “compliant” nations collectively spent trillions enacting the WHO’s guidelines).

Most importantly, the extreme censorship needed to maintain this racket radicalized many moderates who previously would have been politically apathetic. This allowed the alternative media to thrive during COVID-19 (while conversely mass layoffs are hitting the mainstream media). Because of this, those opposed to the pandemic policies now have a large platform much of the public will listen to, and unlike any era in America’s past, the existing propaganda methods (e.g., having everyone in the mass media repeat the same dishonest talking point) no longer have the ability to effectively suppress narratives which compete with the pandemic racket.This situation thus represents an existential threat to the pandemic cartel and the enormous amount of money which had been invested into being able to sell every product they pushed onto the public (e.g., endless experimental mRNA vaccines) after their next fear campaign was rolled out.In the previous article, I argued that the correct response to this new political reality would be to some extent come clean about the mistakes they’ve made and pivot to doing things which could prevent future pandemics (definitively ending all GoF research or putting laws in place which protected the public's right to access repurposed drugs that could treat novel diseases).However, doing that would require everyone invested in the industry to lose a lot of money (e.g., all scientists and academics whose careers depend upon grants for GoF research or emergency pharmaceuticals). So, an alternative option was needed which much of the world recently became aware of thanks to Bret Weinstein’s recent interview:

https://rumble.com/embed/v42u03o/?pub=4

Cannonpointer » 13 Feb 2024, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 10:11 pm

The funny thing is, I actually DO know several people who have died from the vax. 

Their body their choice? I don't think so. They were bullied - and as much as I despise their weakness, I despise the bullies far more.

There were so many coincidental deaths of young, healthy, fully vaccinated athletes.
In the 18 to 30 year age bracket we got to look at all the CV19 related deaths of US Service Members before the vaccine roll out and there were just a few.
There's close to 2 million service members.....  
 

@Majik  From your link:

The Pandemic Treaty. Since any of the legitimate methods for regaining the public’s trust (e.g., apologizing for their actions and reforming their conduct) will cost the billionaires a lot of money, the pandemic cartel is opting for the only other option available to them—doubling down on their current approach (e.g., by arguing the actual reason the pandemic response was a disaster was because we didn’t do enough of what they wanted) and reworking the legal system so any dissent from their policies is illegal. Since that would be almost impossible to do within the existing Democratic framework (as more and more countries are having populist movements rebel against the pandemic cartel) a global strategy which bypasses national governments is being employed instead.This began in November of 2020, at G20 (the annual gathering for the leading economic powers) where a proposal was put forward for a “pandemic treaty” to ensure the nations of the world would handle future pandemics in an “appropriate” manner. A few months later, in March of 2021, citing the statements made at G20, the World Economic Forum (WEF) echoed this call—which suggests much of what they were proposing to the public had already been put together in private.

Note: the Global Biosecurity Agenda was already being created during the Obama administration.  Additionally, before that, massive sums were expended for pandemic prevention and response beginning with the 2001 anthrax letters (which originated from a US biolab).  The PREP Act, which for the first time allowed untested, unlicensed drugs and vaccines to be rolled out to the entire nation with no liability for anyone, simply because of the potential for a national security emergency, got passed in 2005—revealing that the planning for the pandemic racket began at least two decades ago.Since that time, a series of policies and regulations has gradually been put together by the WHO, the UN, the World Bank, the US, the EU and other multinational organizations (with the assistance of the other globalist organizations like the UN and the Rockefeller Foundation) to remedy the “deficiencies” in our pandemic response. Those policies and regulations in turn are part of a “pandemic treaty,” amendments to existing International Health Regulations, or domestic legislation that each member of the WHO is being pushed to adopt, and by virtue of being an international treaty must then be followed by each signatory country.The pandemic treaty in turn contains a wishlist of each thing globalists have been working for over the last few decades. Let’s now review what’s inside it.Climate Change and PandemicsSince the “war on climate change” and the “war on pandemics” represent two of the greatest sources of wealth and power for the global elite, a lot of work has been put into conditioning the public being terrified of the existential risk each allegedly poses.In turn, the pandemic treaty seeks to link both of these together by arguing that “climate change” is the root cause of the disastrous pandemics, and that this “problem” thus necessitates giving the WHO (and its related organizations) control over how we interact with the environment. 

 
Continued...

Note: while the link between the two is typically not specified, whenever a concrete justification is given, it is typically that wildlife habitat loss is bringing humans (or livestock) into closer contact with wild animals that harbor potentially serious diseases. While habitat loss is a huge ecological issue, there is very little evidence tying it to pandemics (as outside of biolabs, consequential animal to human disease transmissions are quite rare).
 
Continued...

One Health
A common way humans have obtained power throughout history is by declaring an idea to the world and then having the world submit to that declaration (e.g., much of my work relates to one of the core declarations our medical system’s credibility rests upon—the lie vaccines are always safe and effective and that the global decline of infectious disease was the result of mass vaccination).

In the modern era, declarations are brought to life by having a large body of literature (and laws) reference and affirm those declarations. Because of this, we regularly see that new brands aiming to serve as modern day declarations be put forward via massive investments made behind the scenes to establish the “credibility” of the declaration.

Note: declarations are also being used to push along the pandemic treaty. For example, the WHO’s director has stated the treaty is necessary for the survival of our future generations (e.g., grandchildren) and that there is a universal agreement amongst nations that we need this treaty to prevent another catastrophe like COVID-19. The important thing to remember is that while these declarations may sound very convincing, they are in fact lies.

One Health began in 2004, at an international (globalist) conference where the idea was put forward that public health needed be expanded into a umbrella which could control (and profit off) every aspect of our lives. For example, “climate change” was folded into public health under the rationale that the dire environmental threats we faced necessitated making “ecological health” a core facet of public health. As you might expect, the push for “One Health” was merged with the notion that the problems we now faced were too complex for the electorate to solve and hence necessitated decisions which would control our lives being delegated to a panel of multidisciplinary “experts.”
Note: the major problem with relying upon experts is how easy they are to buy off—particularly since the (corporate owned) media will typically only allow people who can be bought off to become our “experts.”

Since its founding, the scope of “One Health” has gradually expanded to cover each progressive concept (e.g., overpopulation, where humans should live, what farming practices should be used, global trade, vaccines, managing a wide variety of chronic diseases, promoting diversity and equity etc.). According to an editorial in The Lancet published in January 2023:

The reality is that One Health will be delivered in countries, not by concordats between multilateral organisations, but by taking a fundamentally different approach to the natural world, one in which we are as concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and the environment as we are about humans. In its truest sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely health, equity.

In short it’s morphed from a way to cover up lab leaks to a way to control each aspect of human life in the name of “health.” For example, One Health continually emphasizes the need for more surveillance and centralized control of public “health,” which will likely dovetail with the push to have digital identifications that will be used to track the global population.

Note: more detailed summaries of the broad scope of One Health can be found here and here.

 
Continued...

At this point, I strongly suspect “One Health” was concocted by a public relations firm which was paid to come up with the most emotionally appealing euphemism that would effectively convince everyone to comply with its ever increasing dictates (which the public would likely never agree to were they to be presented in honest language). Likewise, as time has moved forward, more and more other (globalist) organizations have come together to support this declaration. For example:

•The CDC has a “One Health Office” tasked with promoting One Health domestically and abroad.
•The WHO has a team tasked with promoting One Health.
•Many other US agencies are devoted to promoting One Health (e.g., the USDA, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the FDA and the NIH).
•Many other large international organizations (e.g., the UN, FAO, OIE, and UNICEF) along with their satellite organizations in each Western nation are aggressively promoting the One Health message.
•Private globalist organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation and the WEF are funding and promoting One Health.
•Many other longstanding institutions within the medical industrial complex (e.g., the American Medical Association and the premier medical journals) are also promoting One Health.
Note: many foreign equivalents of these institutions are also promoting the One Health agenda (e.g., Australia’s recently created CDC and Moldova’s FDA).

In short, many billions in grants have been given throughout the world to establish “One Health” as a pillar of public health throughout the world. One Health is now embedded in most governments on every continent…even though it is still impossible to identify this nebulous concept has actually done anything that benefited health.

Note: American’s 2023 National Defensive Authorization Act contained a provision to advance the “One Health Approach” and provided at least one billion a year to support it (alongside financing a few related globalist “public health” organizations).

So as you might have guessed, everyone who made a lot of money off COVID-19 (even Pfizer) is promoting One Health because enshrining this incredibly vague declaration within the legal and public health system provides them with the means to enact whatever policies benefit them. In turn, advancing “One Health” is a key theme throughout the WHO’s pandemic treaty.

The parties commit to promote and implement a One Health approach for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response that is coherent, integrated, coordinated collaborative among all relevant actors, with the application of, and in accordance with, national law.

Lastly, for anyone who doubts One Health is part of a globalist power grab to “regulate” (and monetize) every aspect of our lives, consider the text of this report (which repeatedly mentions promoting “One Health”)


More here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how- ... s-horrific