Liberal Forum

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/sta ... 2932916371

GeorgeWashington » 02 Mar 2024, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024, 7:42 am

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/sta ... 2932916371

Cured while a Democratic president was there to save us.  

https://twitter.com/TheGlobeIsDead/stat ... 8701015485

Fired Covid Nurse Goes Public, Exposes Mass Vaccine Deaths


https://slaynews.com/news/fired-covid-n ... ne-deaths/

GeorgeWashington » 04 Mar 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 8:21 am

Fired Covid Nurse Goes Public, Exposes Mass Vaccine Deaths

https://slaynews.com/news/fired-covid-n ... ne-deaths/

She revealed that hospital officials ordered staff to cover up vaccinate-related deaths, often by listing fully-vaccinated dead patients as “unvaccinated” and marking the cause as “Covid.”Hospital staff faced threats for reporting adverse events and deaths related to the vaccines, Macrae revealed.She also stated that medical professionals were met with retaliation for objecting to protocols for isolating patients and denying families access and input over their treatments.According to Macrae, in the first months of the pandemic hospitals were nearly empty as elective procedures halted — a scene that contrasted with media claims of overwhelmed capacity.also stated that medical professionals were met with retaliation for objecting to protocols for isolating patients and denying families access and input over their treatments.According to Macrae, in the first months of the pandemic hospitals were nearly empty as elective procedures halted — a scene that contrasted with media claims of overwhelmed capacity.
 

Majik » 04 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm

She revealed that hospital officials ordered staff to cover up vaccinate-related deaths, often by listing fully-vaccinated dead patients as “unvaccinated” and marking the cause as “Covid.”Hospital staff faced threats for reporting adverse events and deaths related to the vaccines, Macrae revealed.She also stated that medical professionals were met with retaliation for objecting to protocols for isolating patients and denying families access and input over their treatments.According to Macrae, in the first months of the pandemic hospitals were nearly empty as elective procedures halted — a scene that contrasted with media claims of overwhelmed capacity.also stated that medical professionals were met with retaliation for objecting to protocols for isolating patients and denying families access and input over their treatments.According to Macrae, in the first months of the pandemic hospitals were nearly empty as elective procedures halted — a scene that contrasted with media claims of overwhelmed capacity.

They actually had software that would CHANGE the COD and the vax status of the dead. The medical professionals COULDN'T factually report.

Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:52 pm

They actually had software that would CHANGE the COD and the vax status of the dead. The medical professionals COULDN'T factually report.

Gee, and nobody believes me how the 2020 election count was rigged where nobody did it but the software used within Dominion voting machines.

Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2024, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Mar 2024, 7:52 pm

They actually had software that would CHANGE the COD and the vax status of the dead. The medical professionals COULDN'T factually report.

Like I said previously. ....
This event was/is the largest conspiracy ever commited by governments against their citizens ......and the largest attempt to cover it all up in history....
They attempted to poison us all and succeeded in poisoning a majority.....
and  now it's up to the public to scream bloody murder or this cover up succeeds .....

 Neil Oliver Warns 'A Storm Is Coming' for the Guilty

The C#VID shots have k#lled 17 million people worldwide, according to researchers Denis Rancourt and colleagues.

So, why is the govt continuing to double down on these lethal injections?

Here's the grim reality: they know if…

 pic.twitter.com/Pj4fL3m34O— The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) March 4, 2024
 
 
 

https://twitter.com/dragonfishy/status/ ... 2551979095

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status ... 0421998969

GeorgeWashington » 05 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm

https://twitter.com/dragonfishy/status/ ... 2551979095

ABSTRACT

The term “prion” was originally coined to describe the proteinaceous infectious agents involved in mammalian neurological disorders. More recently, a prion has been defined as a nonchromosomal, protein-based genetic element that is capable of converting the copies of its own benign variant into the prion form, with the new phenotypic effects that can be transmitted through the cytoplasm. Some prions are toxic to the cell, are able to aggregate and/or form amyloid structures, and may be infectious in the wild, but none of those traits are seen as an integral property of all prions. We propose that the definition of prion should be expanded, to include the inducible transmissible entities undergoing autocatalytic conversion and consisting of RNA rather than protein. We show that when seen in this framework, some naturally occurring RNAs, including ribozymes, riboswitches, viroids, viroid-like retroelements, and PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), possess several of the characteristic properties of prions.
KEYWORDS: piRNA, prions, ribozymes, viroids

OPINION/HYPOTHESIS 

Mammalian prions: a classical definition. The studies of a peculiar class of infectious diseases in mammals, i.e., transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), and the hunt for the elusive agent that causes these diseases, resulted in the notion of an infectious protein, or “prion.” The known prion-caused TSEs include kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome, and fatal familial insomnia in humans, as well as scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, chronic wasting disease, and several other related diseases in mammals. The early evidence in favor of the protein-only agent for scrapie was based on the observations that the infectious subcellular fraction was highly resistant to UV irradiation, unlike the nucleic acids (summarized in reference 1), that the protocol for purification of the infectious moiety required the conditions used to purify certain proteins rather than RNA, and that the estimated molecular weight and other properties of the main component of such a fraction were close to that of a modest-size protein rather than, for example, a virus nucleic acid (2, 3). This was backed up with experiments designed to exclude a role of small infectious RNAs, in particular viroids, in the etiology of scrapie (4, 5). As early as in 1967, John S. Griffith outlined several possible mechanisms by which a protein could become inherited as a nonchromosomal genetic element. One of those hypothetical mechanisms stated that a prion is a modified form of a cognate cellular protein, which may bind to the normal form of the same protein (in the simplest case, forming a heterodimer of one prion and one normal copy of the protein) and then turn the normal form into another copy of the prion (6). This predicted mechanism was borne out by the evidence and is at the core of the current definition of any prion.

More at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333576/
 

Cannonpointer » 05 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm

ABSTRACT

The term “prion” was originally coined to describe the proteinaceous infectious agents involved in mammalian neurological disorders. More recently, a prion has been defined as a nonchromosomal, protein-based genetic element that is capable of converting the copies of its own benign variant into the prion form, with the new phenotypic effects that can be transmitted through the cytoplasm. Some prions are toxic to the cell, are able to aggregate and/or form amyloid structures, and may be infectious in the wild, but none of those traits are seen as an integral property of all prions. We propose that the definition of prion should be expanded, to include the inducible transmissible entities undergoing autocatalytic conversion and consisting of RNA rather than protein. We show that when seen in this framework, some naturally occurring RNAs, including ribozymes, riboswitches, viroids, viroid-like retroelements, and PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), possess several of the characteristic properties of prions.
KEYWORDS: piRNA, prions, ribozymes, viroids

OPINION/HYPOTHESIS 

Mammalian prions: a classical definition. The studies of a peculiar class of infectious diseases in mammals, i.e., transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), and the hunt for the elusive agent that causes these diseases, resulted in the notion of an infectious protein, or “prion.” The known prion-caused TSEs include kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome, and fatal familial insomnia in humans, as well as scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, chronic wasting disease, and several other related diseases in mammals. The early evidence in favor of the protein-only agent for scrapie was based on the observations that the infectious subcellular fraction was highly resistant to UV irradiation, unlike the nucleic acids (summarized in reference 1), that the protocol for purification of the infectious moiety required the conditions used to purify certain proteins rather than RNA, and that the estimated molecular weight and other properties of the main component of such a fraction were close to that of a modest-size protein rather than, for example, a virus nucleic acid (2, 3). This was backed up with experiments designed to exclude a role of small infectious RNAs, in particular viroids, in the etiology of scrapie (4, 5). As early as in 1967, John S. Griffith outlined several possible mechanisms by which a protein could become inherited as a nonchromosomal genetic element. One of those hypothetical mechanisms stated that a prion is a modified form of a cognate cellular protein, which may bind to the normal form of the same protein (in the simplest case, forming a heterodimer of one prion and one normal copy of the protein) and then turn the normal form into another copy of the prion (6). This predicted mechanism was borne out by the evidence and is at the core of the current definition of any prion.

More at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7333576/
 

What the hell is national center of biological technology information? How much grant money do they get a year pretending to be a non profit group?

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/ ... dium=email

https://twitter.com/toobaffled/status/1 ... 5375205483

Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2024, 12:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2024, 12:40 am

https://twitter.com/toobaffled/status/1 ... 5375205483

Cannot undo what corruption brought forth since dawn of civilization, but that corruption can end tomorrow, today, by simply being honest about how evolving actually happens in plain sight.

Reason it will work is every brain held captive to staying in character by rule of law knows the missing link is denying now is eternity, and cannot admit it for penalty of laws ordering silence about how evolving works naturally here in each alternate reality serving ideologies promising better tomorrows next generation if everyone sacrificing their biological time believing eternity is beyond the moment here.

https://flccc.substack.com/p/is-it-long ... dium=email

Ok.. they say he didn't have any side effects but obviously brain damage is also a side effect..

 

https://youtu.be/3nJxUv_NoOs

This was a very controversial statement at the time since the FDA pushed the drug on African migrants back in 2015 and the drug was praised in several scientific journals.

As The Gateway Pundit reported for years now – There have been over 101 scientific studies on Ivermectin that confirmed the significant benefit of taking the drug in treating COVID-19 in its early stages.
The science is undeniable.

Despite this the US government condemned its use for COVID-19. And the government is now responsible for killing tens of thousands of Americans who did not have to die.

Fast forward to today…
Another new study found that people who received Ivermectin were much better off than those who did not take the drug.

The Epoch Times and ZeroHedge reported:

People who tested positive for COVID-19 and took ivermectin as a treatment recovered faster than a comparison group, a new study found.

The time to self-reported recovery was a median of two days faster among the ivermectin recipients, according to the large UK study.

The quicker recovery period was statistically significant.

People who received ivermectin were also less likely to be hospitalized or die, with 1.6 percent of ivermectin recipients being hospitalized or dying versus 4 percent of the comparison group, which received typical care, which in the UK is largely focused on managing symptoms.

Ivermectin recipients also enjoyed a reduction of severe symptoms and sustained recovery, according to the study.

The paper was published by the Journal of Infection on Feb. 29.

The study covered an open-label trial that involved 2,157 ivermectin recipients and 3,256 who received typical care from June 23, 2021, to July 1, 2022. Participants were randomized and reported symptoms and recovery.

So will those individuals who kept this drug from Americans ever be prosecuted for their crime?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/0 ... 2024-03-09
 

GeorgeWashington » 28 Feb 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2024, 8:35 am

A Spike in Heart Disease Deaths Since Covid Is Puzzling Scientists

Mortality data of the past four years show a wave of deadly cardiovascular and metabolic illness.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... scientists

You can't believe anything they say.

ok, it's a joke but it also isn't when you think about it, that's exactly what the vax cult did.. and still does..