"Chose" is an interesting word.JinnMartini » 20 Nov 2022, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What's wrong with letting those who chose for the jab to let them just die ?
2005 a local prosecutor whispered to my sibling, "By the time we are done, you won't have a home to take those children back into.". Thing was that included our mom she was helping out living in a trailer on her property. It became a national news story for about a year.Cannonpointer » 20 Nov 2022, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑ "Chose" is an interesting word.
If I put a gun to your loved one's head, I could get you to "choose" a lot of **** that you would not have "chosen" otherwise
I don’t care about whether anyone chooses to take the jab.JinnMartini » 20 Nov 2022, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑What's wrong with letting those who chose for the jab to let them just die ?
People don't have rights. they play wordplay until the species eliminates itself from the food chain in this atmosphere. Most likely taking the food chain with it.GeorgeWashington » 22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t care about whether anyone chooses to take the jab.
I care about mandating jabs, face coverings, and lockdowns(incarceration without due process), which were predicated on lies. The “safe and effective” narrative never mentioned risks, and I believe that shining a light on that narrative, exposing that lie, is the best avenue for preventing future violations of people’s rights.
Believe it or not . . . it'll only get worse as we move ahead !GeorgeWashington » 22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t care about whether anyone chooses to take the jab.
I care about mandating jabs, face coverings, and lockdowns(incarceration without due process), which were predicated on lies. The “safe and effective” narrative never mentioned risks, and I believe that shining a light on that narrative, exposing that lie, is the best avenue for preventing future violations of people’s rights.
That may be true where you are, but I don’t see it here.JinnMartini » 22 Nov 2022, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑Believe it or not . . . it'll only get worse as we move ahead !GeorgeWashington » 22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t care about whether anyone chooses to take the jab.
I care about mandating jabs, face coverings, and lockdowns(incarceration without due process), which were predicated on lies. The “safe and effective” narrative never mentioned risks, and I believe that shining a light on that narrative, exposing that lie, is the best avenue for preventing future violations of people’s rights.
You may not see it but numbers don't lie.GeorgeWashington » 23 Nov 2022, 12:32 am » wrote: ↑ That may be true where you are, but I don’t see it here.
Damn am I glad I didn't take the jab!!!freeman » 23 Nov 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ You may not see it but numbers don't lie.
Life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said."
“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”
So that's 4 times what would be expected to result from a once in 200 years catastrophic event.
Fifth-largest U.S. life insurer reports 163% rise in 2021 death-benefit payouts
figures lie and liars figure. its dealing with statistical averaging past against current arrivals never same as anyone existed before or again.freeman » 23 Nov 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ You may not see it but numbers don't lie.
Life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said."
“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”
So that's 4 times what would be expected to result from a once in 200 years catastrophic event.
Fifth-largest U.S. life insurer reports 163% rise in 2021 death-benefit payouts
Buffalo » 23 Nov 2022, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ The vaccinated now account for a majority of COVID deaths.
Thanksgiving for Fauci's exit.
Techno Fog
There’s a remarkable concession appearing in The Washington Post today:
“a majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine.”
The latest data shows that 58% of COVID-19 deaths in August 2022 were from people who were vaccinated or boosted. Based on past figures and the current trends, we can reasonably estimate that the number of vaccinated/boosted COVID-19 deaths will only rise. (In September 2021, the vaccinated accounted for 23% of COVID-19 deaths; in January/February 2022, the vaccinated were 42%.)
This is what happens when you rush ineffective and dangerous vaccines.
The FDA’s promises of efficacy – 91% for the Pfizer vaccine and 93% for the Moderna vaccine – were always based on hope, not data. So too were the promises of safety. At the time of the official approvals, both Pfizer and Moderna hadn’t submitted any type of long-term numbers on effectiveness. Their trials were polluted with the unblinding of participants and their safety studies are “ongoing.”
Now, we’re seeing efficacy numbers plummet within months of vaccination. The pandemic is of the vaccinated. The boosters? They’re to the benefit of the medical establishment and the pharmaceutical companies, as they mask the true problems with the two-shot vaccines.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1 ... mp4?tag=14
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-va ... dium=email
Cannonpointer » 23 Nov 2022, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑ The only thing immunized is big pharma - though the left IS inoculated (against reason).