Liberal Forum

ROG62 » Today, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:48 am

There’s only one of us that has an ex, brown…my condolences…

I have numerous exes, only one ex-wife..

You always struck me as another One & Done.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:59 am

When KJ Muldoon was born in the summer of 2024, his parents were told he had a disease so rare, it strikes about one in 1.3 million newborns. His condition, a severe deficiency of an enzyme known as CPS1, left his tiny body unable to properly break down protein, flooding his blood with toxins that could cause brain damage or death. A liver transplant could correct the problem, but KJ was too young and too fragile to undergo one. With each passing day, the risk of irreversible neurological damage grew. 

What happened next may become the most important medical story of the decade. In just six months, a team at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine designed a personalized therapy that could correct the single misspelled letter in KJ’s DNA using a gene editing technology known as CRISPR. To get the therapy inside KJ’s cells, doctors relied on the same kind of mRNA technology that powered the Covid-19 vaccines. He received his first dose at 6 months old. One year later, KJ is walking, talking and thriving at home with his family.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/09/opin ... -care.html

You poor thing. You have forgotten that you werre programmed to sneer - and indeed dutifully did sneer - at anyone who DARED deny the "science" that mRNA could NEVER affect DNA. Such a thing was scienticiously impossible. You sneered at ME for suggesting such. And now you brag about it.

You were lied to.  You sneered at anyone who did not buy the lie, as you gullibly did. 

And now you are triumphally announcing that you believed and defended a lie - and you feel no shame at all. You're not even COGNIZANT, so addicted to transient and meaningless "victories" as you are, that you are selling out your position for zero gain. The fact that mRNA CAN AND WILL reprogram genes is not the selling point you clearly think it to be. It is precisely the reason we did not want to **** with it, and it is precisely the contra-indicator for mass use. 

How can anyone rebel so successfully against manhood and science and logic as you do daily in this misbegotten sewer?

I am GLAD they helped that infant with mRNA. And I am even MORE glad than before that I never allowed them to inject me with something that could alter my DNA, you retarded jackass. 
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Apr 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

10 Apr 2026, 9:56 am

I have numerous exes, only one ex-wife..

You always struck me as another One & Done.

#doesn’****
 

Papiers!!!
https://x.com/i/status/2043075624969949260
 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features ... mr-vaccine


The health department in South Carolina saw a nearly 170% increase in MMR immunizations at free clinics in January from the year prior and is close to declaring its outbreak over. MMR vaccines jumped 15% in Texas last year before the state declared its outbreak over in August. Utah’s health department also has recorded a bump in immunizations since last summer, a hopeful sign for the country’s most active current outbreak.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features ... mr-vaccine

The health department in South Carolina saw a nearly 170% increase in MMR immunizations at free clinics in January from the year prior and is close to declaring its outbreak over. MMR vaccines jumped 15% in Texas last year before the state declared its outbreak over in August. Utah’s health department also has recorded a bump in immunizations since last summer, a hopeful sign for the country’s most active current outbreak.

Did you send Biden and Kameltoe a Thank You card for the increase in communicable diseases, due to their open border policy?

RebelGator » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Did you send Biden and Kameltoe a Thank You card for the increase in communicable diseases, due to their open border policy?

Do you also gobble racoon cock?

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Do you also gobble racoon cock?

City boy...... can't even spell raccoon.

RebelGator » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

City boy...... can't even spell raccoon.

I don't see it on local menus

This was 2013, and Manchester, England, where we lived, was experiencing a measles outbreak that resulted in more than 1,000 suspected cases. A 1998 study by a British doctor, Andrew Wakefield, linking the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to autism had caused vaccination rates to plummet. The study was later retracted and Mr. Wakefield stripped of his medical license, but the damage had been done. In 2013, most of the cases were among school-age children whose parents had refused to give them the vaccine, which is not compulsory in Britain, or among babies too young to be vaccinated, like my daughter. (The first measles vaccine is usually given at 1 year of age.) 

While I was concerned about Renae, I wasn’t panicked by the diagnosis. At the time, I thought of measles as being like chickenpox. And I knew she was in the right place, in the hospital. Doctors were able to stabilize her breathing quickly, and her fever was responding to Tylenol. Renae would feel poorly for a bit, and then get better.


https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/21/opin ... ation.html

In the United States, where schoolchildren are required to be vaccinated against measles, the national vaccination rate is 92 percent. Many states also allow for exemptions to vaccine requirements, and as a result, U.S. vaccination rates are uneven. Last year, the United States saw its highest rate of measles cases in more than three decades and the country may soon lose its measles elimination status as well. Despite this, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he doesn’t think the government should be mandating vaccines, and that they should be a matter of personal choice. 

Parents must realize that refusing vaccinations doesn’t just put your own child at risk. It puts other children at risk. I don’t know where Renae picked up measles. It’s one of the most contagious viruses that exists, and it could have been from anywhere.


ibid.




"Nooooooooo...not a paper mask! I'd rather die on my back than live on my kneeeeeees!'



These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:56 am

This was 2013, and Manchester, England, where we lived, was experiencing a measles outbreak that resulted in more than 1,000 suspected cases. A 1998 study by a British doctor, Andrew Wakefield, linking the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to autism had caused vaccination rates to plummet. The study was later retracted and Mr. Wakefield stripped of his medical license, but the damage had been done. In 2013, most of the cases were among school-age children whose parents had refused to give them the vaccine, which is not compulsory in Britain, or among babies too young to be vaccinated, like my daughter. (The first measles vaccine is usually given at 1 year of age.) 

While I was concerned about Renae, I wasn’t panicked by the diagnosis. At the time, I thought of measles as being like chickenpox. And I knew she was in the right place, in the hospital. Doctors were able to stabilize her breathing quickly, and her fever was responding to Tylenol. Renae would feel poorly for a bit, and then get better.


https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/21/opin ... ation.html

Evolving reproduces completely separate results never duplicated in history daily here where results end up eternally separated by personal heartbeats adding forward now.
when nothing stays its original form, everything is different 24/7. What is the balance point in time equally existing per ancestor currently alive? NOW here.

Wonder what changed?

The acting head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has canceled the publication of a study that found that the Covid vaccine sharply cut the odds of hospitalizations and emergency visits last winter, a Health Department spokesman said. 

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who has been overseeing the agency’s operations in the absence of a director, objected to the study’s design, saying it painted an inaccurate picture of the vaccine’s effectiveness. 

The study, conducted by C.D.C. scientists, calculated the effectiveness of Covid shots by looking at the vaccination status of people who had sought care at hospitals and emergency rooms. It found that vaccination cut the likelihood of emergency visits due to Covid by 50 percent and of hospitalizations by 55 percent, according to a summary of the study viewed by The New York Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/22 ... cine-study

RebelGator » 20 Apr 2026, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2026, 1:19 pm

City boy...... can't even spell raccoon.

  different species, aka board buddies…his breed…
 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Apr 2026, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2026, 7:00 am

In the United States, where schoolchildren are required to be vaccinated against measles, the national vaccination rate is 92 percent. Many states also allow for exemptions to vaccine requirements, and as a result, U.S. vaccination rates are uneven. Last year, the United States saw its highest rate of measles cases in more than three decades and the country may soon lose its measles elimination status as well. Despite this, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he doesn’t think the government should be mandating vaccines, and that they should be a matter of personal choice. 

Parents must realize that refusing vaccinations doesn’t just put your own child at risk. It puts other children at risk. I don’t know where Renae picked up measles. It’s one of the most contagious viruses that exists, and it could have been from anywhere.

ibid.

"Nooooooooo...not a paper mask! I'd rather die on my back than live on my kneeeeeees!'

These people are so **** g'ddammned stupid

In 2001, 62.8% of US children 19 to 35 months of age were fully immunized with all the vaccines that were recommended at that time. It was estimated that 3 children per thousand had never received any vaccines (unvaccinated). The study found marked differences in the characteristics between children who were completely unvaccinated, those that either received some vaccines, and those who were fully vaccinated as recommended.

Children who had received some but not all recommended doses (undervaccinated) tended to be black and had a younger, often-unmarried mother who had less education than fully immunized children. These under-immunized children were more likely to live in a household below the poverty level, with more children, and had moved across state lines.

Compared to under-vaccinated children, unvaccinated children were more likely to be non-Hispanic white, have a mother who was older, married and who had a college degree. These children were more likely to live in a household with an annual income exceeding $75,000.

Compared to fully immunized children, unvaccinated children were more likely to be non-Hispanic white and live in larger households. Educational levels, family income and other factors did not differ.Almost half (48%) of the parents of unvaccinated children expressed a concern about vaccine safety compared to only 5% of parents of undervaccinated children. In addition, 71% of parents of unvaccinated children indicated that medical doctors have little influence over vaccination decisions for their children compared to 23% of parents of undervaccinated children.

Many children with no vaccinations lived in counties in California, Illinois, New York, Washington, Pennsylvania, Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah, and Michigan.

States that allowed philosophical exemptions to immunization laws in schools had many more unvaccinated children than states that do not have philosophical exemptions.Between 1995 and 2000 the number of children 19-35 months who were unimmunized increased.

https://www.immunizationinfo.org/es/sci ... -children/

#that’sgottahurt
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:56 pm

The acting head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has canceled the publication of a study that found that the Covid vaccine sharply cut the odds of hospitalizations and emergency visits last winter, a Health Department spokesman said. 

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who has been overseeing the agency’s operations in the absence of a director, objected to the study’s design, saying it painted an inaccurate picture of the vaccine’s effectiveness. 

The study, conducted by C.D.C. scientists, calculated the effectiveness of Covid shots by looking at the vaccination status of people who had sought care at hospitals and emergency rooms. It found that vaccination cut the likelihood of emergency visits due to Covid by 50 percent and of hospitalizations by 55 percent, according to a summary of the study viewed by The New York Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/22 ... cine-study

speculation of the intangible…all to fit the narrative…
 
 

ROG62 » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

speculation of the intangible…all to fit the narrative…

JuCo, please....

This is scientific methodology....you are "subject distant"
 

ROG62 » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

In 2001, 62.8% of US children 19 to 35 months of age were fully immunized with all the vaccines that were recommended at that time. It was estimated that 3 children per thousand had never received any vaccines (unvaccinated). The study found marked differences in the characteristics between children who were completely unvaccinated, those that either received some vaccines, and those who were fully vaccinated as recommended.

Children who had received some but not all recommended doses (undervaccinated) tended to be black and had a younger, often-unmarried mother who had less education than fully immunized children. These under-immunized children were more likely to live in a household below the poverty level, with more children, and had moved across state lines.

Compared to under-vaccinated children, unvaccinated children were more likely to be non-Hispanic white, have a mother who was older, married and who had a college degree. These children were more likely to live in a household with an annual income exceeding $75,000.

Compared to fully immunized children, unvaccinated children were more likely to be non-Hispanic white and live in larger households. Educational levels, family income and other factors did not differ.Almost half (48%) of the parents of unvaccinated children expressed a concern about vaccine safety compared to only 5% of parents of undervaccinated children. In addition, 71% of parents of unvaccinated children indicated that medical doctors have little influence over vaccination decisions for their children compared to 23% of parents of undervaccinated children.

Many children with no vaccinations lived in counties in California, Illinois, New York, Washington, Pennsylvania, Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah, and Michigan.

States that allowed philosophical exemptions to immunization laws in schools had many more unvaccinated children than states that do not have philosophical exemptions.Between 1995 and 2000 the number of children 19-35 months who were unimmunized increased.

https://www.immunizationinfo.org/es/sci ... -children/

#that’sgottahurt

Why would this "hurt"?

Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

JuCo, please....

This is scientific methodology....you are "subject distant"
 

did not scientific methodology create 1461 days a year when in actual results the planet rotates 1460 times. is not 24 hours a day must a 15degrees of rotation daily. Is not climate change the difference in climate by latitudes north and south of the equator each revolutions around the star comparing either winter solstice as just before a hew year date selected by mankind to measure how long each reproduction exists birth to dead in the specific ancestral lineage and generation gap arrived.

When science builds misleading facts by theories or theologies with academia training each ancestor to use common sense context in linear explanations of the exponential evolving done so far ancestrally here native to this universal location has not every ancestor been intentionally corrupted by those leading them to believe life exists any other time than here now?