Did you and your wife dose with Ivermectin either time?impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ My kids did not get the vaccine. Considered it only because it gets old quickly having to keep my kids home for 5 to 10 days at a time because the school excludes them due to being in contact with a covid-positive person. With my wife and I both working, this would zap our vacation time to nothing quickly. However, mostly lucked out and only had one exclusion. Has either of them got sick other than standard colds and strep...? No. Wife and I both have had covid twice. Once in May 2020 and then again in December 2022. The second time was fairly mild.. not sure as to why but that's how it goes.
I've had multiple TB (job related) and multiple tetanus (****-happens related). In both cases, it was voluntary. In both cases, I was accepting properly vetted medicines.Varnaj42 » 17 Jan 2023, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑ This 80 something is not getting vaxxed against covid19 (or the covid from any other year). Why should I? just because the globalists tell me I have to? Screw them. Too many horror stories about reactions including sudden death. Before covid did we hear of so many athletes in their twenties dropping dead during a game? No. Such a thing was rare indeed. Now it is happening almost every week. To hell with the so called vaccine.
I am NOT an anti-vaxxer. Since my birth I've had many, some involuntary and some voluntary. I've never had a problem from any of them. But now here comes covid and people are dropping left and right. And all the problems are with the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated. But the unvaccinated are being punished. Why? Screw this so called vaccine. There are not enough cops in the world to force it on me.
It hit me like a truck, slapped the taste out of my mouth. Came on on a monday, bitch-slapped me on a tuesday. Tested positive tuesday, started the Ivermectin protocol - was working out on friday.impartialobserver » 18 Jan 2023, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ My kids did not get the vaccine. Considered it only because it gets old quickly having to keep my kids home for 5 to 10 days at a time because the school excludes them due to being in contact with a covid-positive person. With my wife and I both working, this would zap our vacation time to nothing quickly. However, mostly lucked out and only had one exclusion. Has either of them got sick other than standard colds and strep...? No. Wife and I both have had covid twice. Once in May 2020 and then again in December 2022. The second time was fairly mild.. not sure as to why but that's how it goes.
My answer would have been, neither is the vax. But unlike the vax, Ivermectin is not a proven failure, either.Buffalo » 18 Jan 2023, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ My last doc appointment he and I got into an argument about the efficacy of Ivermectin which he said was not proven.
Never thought of that. But I have never been a fast thinker...Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ My answer would have been, neither is the vax. But unlike the vax, Ivermectin is not a proven failure, either.
The first time, May 2020, was rough but mostly due to having no time to recover. Wife was laid up and kids were home and supposedly going to do distance learning. Yeah.... great joke, I know. All of this while working from home and having to deal with the deluge that comes from having 485,000 + claims. If you do not know, my job is connected to unemployment insurance so when our Governor shut down the state.. it made our life rough.Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ It hit me like a truck, slapped the taste out of my mouth. Came on on a monday, bitch-slapped me on a tuesday. Tested positive tuesday, started the Ivermectin protocol - was working out on friday.
WHY you took the experiment will not change THAT you took it. Whatever the experiment's outcome, YOU have to own - not the people who bullied you. Good luck.impartialobserver » 19 Jan 2023, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ The first time, May 2020, was rough but mostly due to having no time to recover. Wife was laid up and kids were home and supposedly going to do distance learning. Yeah.... great joke, I know. All of this while working from home and having to deal with the deluge that comes from having 485,000 + claims. If you do not know, my job is connected to unemployment insurance so when our Governor shut down the state.. it made our life rough.
Second time was about 3 weeks ago. It was fairly mild. Had a slight fever and some shortness of breath for two days and then back to normal.
The point is that I do not find it necessary to give the vax to my kids. I only did it because I did not want to deal with a ton of paperwork. Survived it the first time just fine so no real need for a vax.
Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ WHY you took the experiment will not change THAT you took it. Whatever the experiment's outcome, YOU have to own - not the people who bullied you. Good luck.
Read your last post. Then look up "bullying" in websters.impartialobserver » 19 Jan 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ And where have I once laid blame on anyone. Yes, I took it and if come to find out.. not the best decision then so be it. Was I bullied? Not really.
There's your bullying.impartialobserver » 19 Jan 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑Now, doing a bunch of paperwork and testing every week would have sucked.
Right. You got bullied.impartialobserver » 19 Jan 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑The jab took 15 minutes including travel time. Paperwork and testing... probably 2 hours per week. It was a simple decision based on value of time.
Technically the world is now in an experiment.Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Read your last post. Then look up "bullying" in websters.
There's your bullying.
Right. You got bullied.
And also right - you have to own the results of your experiment with drugs.
No, the vax rate means the false flag was a success.DeezerShoove » 19 Jan 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Technically the world is now in an experiment.
Vaxxed or not, a new virus is out there thanks to science.
It wasn't tested until about November 2019.
All we know for sure is that it is contagious and feeds on the weak.
Does that mean the experiment is a success?
yeah, but...Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2023, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑ No, the vax rate means the false flag was a success.
The game was never to release a virus. The game was to get sheep to line up for the slaughter. The virus is a joke. The gaslighting is the only thing that made the virus seem like more than a seasonal flu.
The year the virus was SAID to have claimed so many lives, the flu claimed zero.
Covid healed the flu. Yay.
Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2023, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑No, the vax rate means the false flag was a success.DeezerShoove » 19 Jan 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Technically the world is now in an experiment.
Vaxxed or not, a new virus is out there thanks to science.
It wasn't tested until about November 2019.
All we know for sure is that it is contagious and feeds on the weak.
Does that mean the experiment is a success?
The game was never to release a virus. The game was to get sheep to line up for the slaughter. The virus is a joke. The gaslighting is the only thing that made the virus seem like more than a seasonal flu.
The year the virus was SAID to have claimed so many lives, the flu claimed zero.
Covid healed the flu. Yay.
The year the virus was SAID to have claimed so many lives, the flu claimed zero.
I count myself as lucky (so far) that I didn't place much value in the scares on either side of the Kung Flu and "vax", yet have remained unscathed in any meaningful way.