Are you denying the science becuase it is addressed to the editor of a peer-reviewed scientific journal?IkeBana » 21 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑This final recommendation for discontinuation of vaccination is from a letter to the editor...from who **** knows.GeorgeWashington » 21 Jul 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued.
Your link appears to address abstracts, not letters to the editor.Phelix_Dacat » 21 Jul 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ TLDR: if this was actually important, why did Kenji Yamamoto, M.D., have to pay someone thousands of dollars to publish his letter to the editor?
GeorgeWashington's link in post #123 shows the Dear Editor letter is contained in a section titled Abstract. Kenji Yamamoto, M.D. paid the "journal" thousands of dollars to publish his letter within the abstract.Cannonpointer: Your link appears to address abstracts, not letters to the editor.
What is the alternative? Are you suggesting that an article is not "important" if it isn't free to publish/consume?Phelix_Dacat » 21 Jul 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ TLDR: if this was actually important, why did Kenji Yamamoto, M.D., have to pay someone thousands of dollars to publish his letter to the editor?
Phelix_Dacat » 21 Jul 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ TLDR: if this was actually important, why did Kenji Yamamoto, M.D., have to pay someone thousands of dollars to publish his letter to the editor?
Kenji Yamamoto, M.D., from the Center of Varicose Veins from the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery at Okamura Memorial Hospital in Japan took time out of his day from dealing with elderly ladies varicose veins to write a letter the the editor of Virology Journal (via BioMedCentral which is part of Springer Nature) at a cost to him of £2090.00/$2890.00/€2390.00 plus VAT or local taxes where applicable.
Open access publishing is not without costs. Virology Journal therefore levies an article-processing charge of £2090.00/$2890.00/€2390.00 for each article accepted for publication, plus VAT or local taxes where applicable.
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/sub ... nd-funding
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/about
The most important Springer Nature peer-review question is "did the check clear?"
Phelix_Dacat » 22 Jul 2022, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ GeorgeWashington's link in post #123 shows the Dear Editor letter is contained in a section titled Abstract. Kenji Yamamoto, M.D. paid the "journal" thousands of dollars to publish his letter within the abstract.
Just wow, son. I make a post deriding your comprehension of science, and you CLEARLY think, the only things missing are absolute confirmation and irony - I'd best provide those. Just wow.IkeBana » 24 Jul 2022, 5:18 am » wrote: ↑So...you say, right here, the latest medical and psychological clinical opinions on gender and sex are not able to be proven wrong by you bigots. Thank you. Either that or you don't understand the language very well.Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2022, 12:42 am » wrote: ↑ Like when you fruitckes advance unfalsifiable gender claims, and retardedly think you are being scienticious.
You're the illiterate stupid cocksucker rent boi. By your own words your statement supports our position on gender and sex. You say we support "unfalsifiable" opinions.Cannonpointer » 24 Jul 2022, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑Just wow, son. I make a post deriding your comprehension of science, and you CLEARLY think, the only things missing are absolute confirmation and irony - I'd best provide those. Just wow.IkeBana » 24 Jul 2022, 5:18 am » wrote: ↑So...you say, right here, the latest medical and psychological clinical opinions on gender and sex are not able to be proven wrong by you bigots. Thank you. Either that or you don't understand the language very well.Cannonpointer » 22 Jul 2022, 12:42 am » wrote: ↑ Like when you fruitckes advance unfalsifiable gender claims, and retardedly think you are being scienticious.
You are one stupid mother ****, boy.
Thanks again numbnuts.unfalsifiable adjective
un·fal·si·fi·able | \ ˌən-ˌfȯl-sə-ˈfī-ə-bəl \
: not capable of being proved false
Yes yes, fruitcake. You are very welcome.IkeBana » 25 Jul 2022, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ You're the illiterate stupid cocksucker rent boi. By your own words your statement supports our position on gender and sex. You say we support "unfalsifiable" opinions.
Thanks again numbnuts.
GHETTOBLASTER » 25 Jul 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.nj.com/opinion/2020/09/with ... inion.html
""With COVID-19, every prison sentence is a potential death sentence"" | OPINION .OF THE LIBERAL MIND...NO STATS TO BACK IT UP....JUST FEELINGS AND OPINION
Conservative News Viewers More Accurately Estimate COVID-19 Death Risk - Rasmussen Reports®
MILLIONS OF MSM TERRIFIED LIBERALS HAVE BEEN TRAINED TO BELIEVE THAT CATCHING CV19 IS A DEATH SENTENCE
GLOBALIST PROPAGANDA WORKS BEST ON WEAK MINDS
IkeBana » 25 Jul 2022, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ You're the illiterate stupid cocksucker rent boi. By your own words your statement supports our position on gender and sex. You say we support "unfalsifiable" opinions.
Thanks again numbnuts.
GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Jul 2022, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I always figured that promoting ...
single child / self indulgent / effeminately raised / low energy / drug addled children via....
[[[WOMENS LIB / QUEER NATION / ANTI HUSBAND FAMILY LAW /ENVIRONMENTALISM
would be enough to bring about a gradual reduction in our population.
In just my lifetime our population has more than doubled.
I never figured that the [[[[[[NWO]]]]]] would run out of patience with their population reduction programme and start throwing non stop viral / weaponized pandemics / lethal injections at us to get 'er done....?
Hopefully everyone realizes that FAUCI FAKED TAKING THE VACCINE...RIGHT...?
Take care of your own health and don’t expect the rest of the world to wipe your *** for you.supraTruth3 » 02 Aug 2022, 3:04 am » wrote: ↑ JUST WEAR THE DAMN MASKS IN THE STORES & QUIT SPREADING THIS ****, DAMN IT! IT'S STILL KILLING THE VUNERABLE!