Vegas » 16 Jul 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, but we are not being exploited like some of these poorer countries we exploit. Not even close.
Well, there is a half a day betwixt tides - that's six hours in and six hours out. The typical tide is 2 feet of water. Divide 24 inches by 360 minutes, and you're looking at a slow but inexorable momentum.Vegas » 16 Jul 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Frog in a slowing heating pot of water. We get used to the heat as it goes on because it is too subtle to notice. Then poof! We're boiling and served well done. It's not a tide, I tide is noticeable and obvious.
SJConspirator » 16 Jul 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Welcome to the place called earth
Where human rights depend on the place of your birth
https://youtu.be/6IhaL1ighcw
and time of arrival.SJConspirator » 16 Jul 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Welcome to the place called earth
Where human rights depend on the place of your birth
https://youtu.be/6IhaL1ighcw
righteous » 15 Jul 2022, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑ So: after WW II, the U.S. regime perpetrated at least 130+ U.S. invasions (out of 161 foreign military deployments of U.S. troops during 1945-2021, not even including The U.S. Government’s usage of proxy-forces instead of U.S. troops, such as is now the U.S. regime’s standard way of invading, because it’s far cheaper to do).
After World War II ended, the U.S. regime slaughtered or assisted in slaughtering, between 1945 and 2007 (and not even counting more recently, such as in Syria and Yemen), “between 20 and 30 million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world”. (This count also doesn’t include the numbers, such as in Iraq after the 1990 war, which died as a result of U.S.-initiated sanctions against countries that America’s billionaires wanted to bring under their control that weren’t yet under their control.)
What U.S. Hegemony Is, How It Started, and WhenSouth Front
"Allowed to bring down NATO"???Monderegal » 16 Jul 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ Well, I hate to make the counterargument but US hegemony could be seen as a good thing. It stopped nuclear proliferation and adds a security umbrella for many nations around the Earth. This all really started after the Cold War which was supposed to bring the Pax Americana and the End of History. I also think that the Cold War was a time where both sides enacted horror in the battle of ideologies (Vietnam?). Still, Russia would probably be ravaging Europe if Trump was truly allowed to bring down NATO. We have the military and we use it to bring peace in a somewhat convoluted way.
Stocking?
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ "Allowed to bring down NATO"???
Who stopped trump from "bringing down NATO"?
They did a great job - did anyone hold banquet?
Monderegal » 16 Jul 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Well I do remember he said something to the tune of NATO being "braindead". I think there was a lot of fear that Russia would take advantage if Trump weakened the alliance like he said he would. Of course, questions like that are above my paygrade, I just know that there were fears about that with a second Trump term. There is also questions of whether Putin would have invaded Ukraine if Trump was in power. That kind of thing is why we have a CIA.
Xavier_Onassis » 16 Jul 2022, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Stocking?
Surely you mean "STALKING".
Semiliterate ninnies abound in this forum infested with Trumpuppits,
Wow. Thank God somebody stopped that comment from destroying NATO.Monderegal » 16 Jul 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Well I do remember he said something to the tune of NATO being "braindead".
So, if he "weakened" the alliance by making NATO members up their contributions to match their original agreements, Russia could "take advantage" of this alliance-crippling spending increase by... ???Monderegal » 16 Jul 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ I think there was a lot of fear that Russia would take advantage if Trump weakened the alliance like he said he would.
Manifestly, sir. Manifestly.
As told to you by trustworthy sources, no doubt. Maybe the same folks who tell you chicks have dicks and participating in drug experiments is a capital idea?Monderegal » 16 Jul 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑I just know that there were fears about that with a second Trump term.
No, we have a CIA to rob other countries of democracy on behalf of billionaires by fostering coups de etat - so that the billionires can get their resources on the cheap from a sok puppet government.Monderegal » 16 Jul 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑There is also questions of whether Putin would have invaded Ukraine if Trump was in power. That kind of thing is why we have a CIA.
They are officially an intelligence agency. I've been pervue of their work in the past.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No, we have a CIA to rob other countries of democracy on behalf of billionaires by fostering coups de etat - so that the billionires can get their resources on the cheap from a sok puppet government.
Pervue.Monderegal » 16 Jul 2022, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ They are officially an intelligence agency. I've been pervue of their work in the past.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Pervue.
You use that word a lot. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Well, I'm sure the rest of your communication could be cobbled together into some meaning, absent that word.
WOW..!!Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Pervue.
You use that word a lot. I do not think it means what you think it means.
He's a childless loser who jacks off while reading R Crumb comics.roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Dads and daughters can be affectionate Gomer...did you find any pictures of Joe and his daughter in the freaking shower???
You win the stupid prize today futz...geeeez!