Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I believe that your need to measure trump by putting him beside biden rather speaks to that all by itself, don't you think? A partisan measure suggests a partisan measurer, don't you think?
Argung personalities instead of issues is also quite typical of partisans. It's what beevee does. "That guy is a dunce, this guy is an idiot" - rather than address the issue the fellow raised.
When someone takes a partisan shot at trump in a thread about U.S. hegemony, perhaps the better part of non-partisan valor would be to let it go and address the issue the partisan shot was designed to deflect away from.
Understatement of the year. The only reason gender confusion lives is that the right made only fake attempts to kill it.
Agreed. But the solution is NOT the right and their repubs.roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ currently the biggest problem is the left and their dems.
Start with the larger tumor - which is the false opposition and political cover the parties provide each other to **** us out of our country - and this, under orders from their MUTUAL wall street masters.roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Should we always concede yer point to save us? Or should we start with the larger tumor?
Now yer posting like B.See. Shotgun pattern.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Understatement of the year. The only reason gender confusion lives is that the right made only fake attempts to kill it.
Silly **** HAS to be propped up - and is blood-simple to execute and bury. The republican party is just that - party. Party to every **** bit of it. They provide support through token opposition.
Agreed. But the solution is NOT the right and their repubs.
Start with the larger tumor - which is the false opposition and political cover the parties provide each other to **** us out of our country - and this, under orders from their MUTUAL wall street masters.
The left and the right are just servants of the real problem. The "tumor on the left" could not exist without republican support.roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Now yer posting like B.See. Shotgun pattern.![]()
Let's consider this...
If we destroy the huge tumor on the left...then we put the smaller tumors on the right in "Harms Way" as it should be.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ The left nd the right re just servants of the real problem. The "tumor on the left" could not exist without republican support.
YOUR POINT NOTED. THE AUTHOR IN MANY OF HIS ARTICLES POINTS BLAME ON BILLIONAIRES, THEN REFERS TO ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE BEING JEWISH OR ZIONIST, ALTHOUGH HE THEN ADMITS ITS SOMETHING HE NEVER LOOKED INTO BEFORE.FOS » 16 Jul 2022, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ im familiar with southfront but i find them a bit cowardly cause they refuse to focus on how this crap is at the service of zionists, not the 'USA'
Absolutely. But fox is a POTENT weapon, bridled by management. Just like the republican party.roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ The tumor on the left has most of the MSM. Far more leftists and rinos enjoy the MSM.
The majority of viewers trust fox over the rest...even a plurality of dems.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Absolutely. But fox is a POTENT weapon, bridled by management. Just like the republican party.
That only shows how far off the rails the others are. You are right back to measuring against a turd. I guess a guy that runs out on his wife and kids is a paragon of **** virtue, the minute I invoke the name Judas Iscariot, yeah?roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ The majority of viewers trust fox over the rest...even a plurality of dems.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ That only shows how far off the rails the others are. You are right back to measuring against a turd. I guess a guy that runs out on his wife and kids is a paragon of **** virtue, the minute I invoke the name Judas Iscariot, yeah?
Compared to Epstein, Weinstein's a decent fella - all of his victims were grown.
If fox had a scintilla of integrity, the carbon conversation would never have gotten legs, the gender insanity would never have EXISTED, and no one with any sense at all would have been vaxxed. With gate keepers like fox, we don't NEED crashers.
Cheerleaders for one sided mantra keep each one sided mantra in public view so nobody can express understanding of the whole with all the factual loopholes designed in law and order defending people's chosen character role playing cradle to grave.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ That only shows how far off the rails the others are. You are right back to measuring against a turd. I guess a guy that runs out on his wife and kids is a paragon of **** virtue, the minute I invoke the name Judas Iscariot, yeah?
Compared to Epstein, Weinstein's a decent fella - all of his victims were grown.
If fox had a scintilla of integrity, the carbon conversation would never have gotten legs, the gender insanity would never have EXISTED, and no one with any sense at all would have been vaxxed. With gate keepers like fox, we don't NEED crashers.
roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ The majority of viewers trust fox over the rest...even a plurality of dems.
SJConspirator » 16 Jul 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ what they choose to talk about is a problem. Just like CNN.
there was but a tiny peep in all the MSM about how we send $billions to Ukraine (MIC) while US citizens can't afford gas right now. That should have been talked about 24/7 for weeks imo
SJConspirator » 16 Jul 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ what they choose to talk about is a problem. Just like CNN.
there was but a tiny peep in all the MSM about how we send $billions to Ukraine (MIC) while US citizens can't afford gas right now. That should have been talked about 24/7 for weeks imo
Plundering IS a "benefit"... That's what plunder is all about.SJConspirator » 16 Jul 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ we are being exploited to a lesser degree, because they tax the **** out of us to pay for it. But many Americans perceive that there is a benefit to being the world's bully, since we plunder all the natural resources of foriegn lands
Except that we are not the beneficiaries of the plunder. We are likewise plundered, ourselves.DeezerShoove » 16 Jul 2022, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Plundering IS a "benefit"... That's what plunder is all about.
The consequences could be minimal, could be terrible. That's what people get confused about.
The perception is clouded because I see it as "our tax dollars at work" on some level.
We give away lots of **** to the world, we get to take some **** back from the world.
I believe the thinking doesn't get much more complicated than that . . .
Mayhaps you missed my angle a bit.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Except that we are not the beneficiaries of the plunder. We are likewise plundered, ourselves.
Look about you. Tent **** cities. Slums.
Oh, you can say - that's because they're druggies. They behave badly. But introducing them to drugs as children was the METHOD of plunder. There does not exist on this earth a plundered people whom you cannot find reasons to blame for their condition - including our people. They've taken it to an absolute art form in the case of the palestinians - NO ONE doesn't hate 'em.
I can show you so many perfectly decent, non drug addicted people who "slipped through the cracks" that you would have to ask, "Are those cracks, or chasms? Do you genuinely believe that two parents working and kids unsupervised is our birthright? No, sir. WE are being plundered.
This girl was your favorite pump! You sick bastid!roadkill » 16 Jul 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Dads and daughters can be affectionate Gomer...did you find any pictures of Joe and his daughter in the freaking shower???
You win the stupid prize today futz...geeeez!

I suspect our tormenters never were.