"We Don't Care How Many Ukrainians Die" Senator Richard Black

User avatar
By Hank
16 Jul 2022 7:57 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 2 3 4 5
User avatar
roadkill
16 Jul 2022 9:21 am
User avatar
      
16,072 posts
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 9:20 am » wrote: He's a senator, dick sucker. And you're a what -a gender confused vax nazi?

Among other things.   lol
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Jul 2022 9:26 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,998 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2022, 8:09 am » wrote: Indisputably not.

In 3 concise bullet points, where the **** was he heading?

No questions, dick sucker. 
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Jul 2022 9:26 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,998 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2022, 8:13 am » wrote: In 3 concise bullet points, where was he going?

No questions, dick sucker.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Jul 2022 9:28 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,998 posts
SJConspirator » 16 Jul 2022, 8:23 am » wrote: We have now lost two members to dementia. First it was CG, now BV. Alzheimers is a sad condition, and a silent killer

I WISH whatever is killing that fruitloop were silent.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Jul 2022 9:28 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,998 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2022, 8:27 am » wrote: That's why you never ask me questions,  right?

1. Do you not see what is so terribly **** wrong with this sentence? 
Your neighbor grabs one of your kids and threatens to shoot it....unless you give him your back yard.

Give him the dirt and apologize.

2. Because Pootie couldn't keep it in his **** pants.

3. Let the day soon come when we hunt down every **** pootie cockholster and ship them to Kyiv.

No questions, dick sucker.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Jul 2022 9:29 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,998 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: I'm quite consistently opposed to pre-emotive strikes.

They enjoy a very checkered history.

Need I labor where this went wrong?

No questions, dick sucker.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Jul 2022 9:30 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,998 posts
FOS » 16 Jul 2022, 8:40 am » wrote: meanwhile BV would also condemn neville chamberlain for not wanting to go to war with hitler.
He's a conventional midwit whose "opinions" are manufactured out of house. 
 
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Blackvegetable
16 Jul 2022 9:37 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
36,357 posts
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2022, 9:20 am » wrote: He's a senator, dick sucker. And you're a what -a gender confused vax nazi?

no, he isn't. 

**** idiot.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Jul 2022 9:42 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,998 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2022, 9:37 am » wrote: no, he isn't. 

**** idiot.
No questions, dick sucker. 
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Warcok
16 Jul 2022 9:44 am
User avatar
     
4,998 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2022, 8:09 am » wrote: In 3 concise bullet points, where the **** was he heading?
Comet Pizza to tag team Ashley with Joe.



Image
 
User avatar
Xavier_Onassis
16 Jul 2022 12:37 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,999 posts
Hank » 16 Jul 2022, 8:06 am » wrote: Still more coherent than Joe Biden
Oh, ****!   It is ever so obvious that Putin has been planning to invade and subjugate Ukraine for several years now, because Ukraine is a serious threat to Putin's dictatorship. NATO stated the obvious: Ukraine, like any sovereign state, has the right to make its own alliances as it sees fit.
There were ALREADY NATO troop's on Russian's borders prior to Putin's attack.
User avatar
Xavier_Onassis
16 Jul 2022 12:47 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,999 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 16 Jul 2022, 12:37 pm » wrote: Oh, ****!   It is ever so obvious that Putin has been planning to invade and subjugate Ukraine for several years now, because Ukraine is a serious threat to Putin's dictatorship. NATO stated the obvious: Ukraine, like any sovereign state, has the right to make its own alliances as it sees fit.
There were ALREADY NATO troop's on Russian's borders prior to Putin's attack.

Ukraine is potentially a more prosperous nation than  Russia: it has the best farmland in Europe and an educated population that speaks both Russian and Ukrainian.  If Ukraine is independent, it will be able to overcome the corruption that has caused it so many problems, because it was abetted by Russia. Ukraine is a less Catholic and more European nation than Russia.

If Ukraine achieves its independence, it will likely surpass Russia in standard of living and will develop industries that can compete with the rest of the world, unlike Russia, that depends on oil, coal, mining and timber. Ukrainian radio and TV stations will become serious competition for Russia's puppet media outlets, and Russians will begin to ask themselves "Why can't we be more like Ukraine?"

You claim that Biden makes less sense than this silly defeatist Congressman. But of course, you do not say WHY.  This is because (a) you have no clue what is really going on and why a free Ukraine is important, as (b) you have NO CLUE what Biden's policy really is. Perhaps you prefer to get your information from the Figplucker.


 
 
User avatar
FOS
16 Jul 2022 12:50 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 16 Jul 2022, 12:37 pm » wrote: Ukraine is a serious threat to Putin's dictatorship. NATO stated the obvious: Ukraine, like any sovereign state, has the right to make its own alliances as it sees fit.
There were ALREADY NATO troop's on Russian's borders prior to Putin's attack.
So you seem to agree that his attack was perfectly justified.
User avatar
Xavier_Onassis
16 Jul 2022 1:00 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,999 posts
FOS » 16 Jul 2022, 12:50 pm » wrote: So you seem to agree that his attack was perfectly justified.
No, I regard Putin's attack as IMMORAL, as it is a clear violation of the UN Charter, which opposes wars of conquest. I simply think that Putin is a shameless dictator and wishes to stay in power. He wants to avoid the sort of treatment that Mubarak, or worse, Qadaffi got at the hands of his enemies.

If Putin were a moral person, which is decidedly is not, he should step down or actually stop silencing his opposition and allow free and fair elections. Putin is a jerk, in the same way that Hitler and Stalin and Ceauceascu were jerks.
User avatar
FOS
16 Jul 2022 1:02 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 16 Jul 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: No, I regard Putin's attack as IMMORAL, as it is a clear violation of the UN Charter, which opposes wars of conquest. I simply think that Putin is a shameless dictator and wishes to stay in power. He wants to avoid the sort of treatment that Mubarak, or worse, Qadaffi got at the hands of his enemies.

If Putin were a moral person, which is decidedly is not, he should step down or actually stop silencing his opposition and allow free and fair elections. Putin is a jerk, in the same way that Hitler and Stalin and Ceauceascu were jerks.

you just argued yourself that this war was inspired by an existential threat against russia, you fool. Not conquest.
User avatar
sooted up Cyndi
16 Jul 2022 1:06 pm
User avatar
Water Cooler Poleece
Water Cooler Poleece
10,440 posts
FOS » 16 Jul 2022, 12:50 pm » wrote: So you seem to agree that his attack was perfectly justified.
I Care! Fossy,, I dont care who is right or wrong....politically..
I try to put myself in the position of the little people.
Imagine IF I had to leave my home.. And head out on the road! Leave everything behind... my home..8 room house.. my friends..
my  Gawd.. Never mind the political aspects of it.. Have you ever thought of that?
It's easy for us to debate the politics of it! because we are so far  removed.. it is not funny! it is that simple.
Image
User avatar
FOS
16 Jul 2022 1:13 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
sootedupCyndi » 16 Jul 2022, 1:06 pm » wrote: I Care! Fossy,, I dont care who is right or wrong....politically..
I try to put myself in the position of the little people.
Imagine IF I had to leave my home.. And head out on the road! Leave everything behind... my home..8 room house.. my friends..
my  Gawd.. Never mind the political aspects of it.. Have you ever thought of that?
It's easy for us to debate the politics of it! because we are so far  removed.. it is not funny! it is that simple.

who is to blame for this suffering of the people?

the ones who provoked a major military power to invade their country.

Putin himself was given no practical choice. None. blame nato and zelensky for this.
User avatar
Xavier_Onassis
16 Jul 2022 1:15 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
4,999 posts
FOS » 16 Jul 2022, 1:02 pm » wrote: you just argued yourself that this war was inspired by an existential threat against russia, you fool. Not conquest.
NO!  I  argued that it was an existential threat to Putin's dictatorship, imbecile!
Putin is not defending Russia, Putin is defending Putin.
User avatar
FOS
16 Jul 2022 1:18 pm
FOS
User avatar
      
5,595 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 16 Jul 2022, 1:15 pm » wrote: NO!  I  argued that it was an existential threat to Putin's dictatorship, imbecile!
Putin is not defending Russia, Putin is defending Putin.

that is not how the majority of russians see it.
User avatar
Hank
16 Jul 2022 1:20 pm
User avatar
   
537 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 16 Jul 2022, 12:37 pm » wrote: Oh, ****!   It is ever so obvious that Putin has been planning to invade and subjugate Ukraine for several years now, because Ukraine is a serious threat to Putin's dictatorship. NATO stated the obvious: Ukraine, like any sovereign state, has the right to make its own alliances as it sees fit.
There were ALREADY NATO troop's on Russian's borders prior to Putin's attack.
You just rebutted your own argument... 
There were already NATO troops in Russian's borders before the war. 

 
When I lost hope I gained my freedom
1 2 3 4 5

Who is online

In total there are 1361 users online :: 8 registered, 15 bots, and 1338 guests
Bots: Moblie Safari, facebookexternalhit, app.hypefactors.com, Feedfetcher-Google, CriteoBot, linkfluence.com, semantic-visions.com, proximic, Applebot, curl/7, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, Googlebot, bingbot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum