Actually, he is "retired" after ten years. But what he was a US Marine Pilot during Vietnam and served 31 years both active and reserve.Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑Exactly.IkeBana » 18 Jul 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ Of course...but let's get it complete...
Richard H. Black is not a Senator. He was never a US Senator. He was a state senator from the state of Virginia. We might as well get our information from the guy at the shoe rental counter at the local bowling alley.
No, I wouldn't.Huey » 18 Jul 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Actually, he is "retired" after ten years. But what he was a US Marine Pilot during Vietnam and served 31 years both active and reserve.
Black was a career military officer. He served in both the U.S. Marines and in the U.S. Army JAG Corps. He served a total of 31 years active and reserve, rising from the rank of private to full colonel.[3] He is a graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Command and General Staff College, and Naval Aviator's Flight School.[4]
Black enlisted in the Marines in 1963 at the age of 19.[3] He graduated from Parris Island as a PFC and entered the Marine Aviation Cadet Program at Naval Air Station Pensacola. He was commissioned a 2nd Lt. in 1965.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Blac ... ey.%5B5%5D
Normally one YOU would consider a subject matter expert.
I know. He is a Repub and doesn’t agree with you.
No...I caught about 2 minutes of his act.
If Putin destroys the infrastructure in Ukraine he destroys what he wants most from Ukraine, it's economy. The Russian economy outside of what the Russians can pull out of the ground, is ****. Sure NATO bugs Putin, but he knows that if he leaves his neighbors alone, he has nothing to fear from NATO. Without his control over the Ukraine economy, with Ukraine in the European Union, his people will finally get sick of the oligarchs feeding off of them like sharks in a frenzy, and looting the natural resources of the country. Putin knows that can hurt him.GHETTO » wrote:Hank gets the conversation rolling with a ONE PUNCH KNOCK OUT...Hank » 16 Jul 2022, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Russia could have easily destroyed Ukraine's infrastructure with their air superiority
You do listen to Biden .IkeBana » 18 Jul 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ Of course...but let's get it complete...
Richard H. Black is not a Senator. He was never a US Senator. He was a state senator from the state of Virginia. We might as well get our information from the guy at the shoe rental counter at the local bowling alley.
idiot won't, fool believes, corrupted obey, honest are eliminated. 3 out of 4, democracy wins by popular demand.
Ukraine didn't apply to the Eu until after it was invaded. Your post has **** all to do with anything.IkeBana » 18 Jul 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ If Putin destroys the infrastructure in Ukraine he destroys what he wants most from Ukraine, it's economy. The Russian economy outside of what the Russians can pull out of the ground, is ****. Sure NATO bugs Putin, but he knows that if he leaves his neighbors alone, he has nothing to fear from NATO. Without his control over the Ukraine economy, with Ukraine in the European Union, his people will finally get sick of the oligarchs feeding off of them like sharks in a frenzy, and looting the natural resources of the country. Putin knows that can hurt him.
And the above posts confirm what a stoopid pack of **** trumpers are.
Biden makes sense most of the time.
Rational minds only think existential thoughts been repeated for hundreds of generations seeking their origin as their origin was conceived to occupy space mutually evolving here now.Xavier_Onassis » 19 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden makes sense most of the time.
Strangely, it is not a crime to listen to the president. It is not even (can you believe this) a crime to agree with him sometimes.
Trump only made sense by accident, and very rarely.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2 ... best-jets/Hank » 16 Jul 2022, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ https://youtu.be/GXOWZnRCc20
Senator Richard Black Tells It For What It is
@Cannonpointer
The long, unfortunate history of friendly fire accidents in U.S. conflictshttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/long-unfort ... -conflicts
With Russia having one of the best air defense systems in the world, possibly the best ,it is no surprise they can shoot down their own jets.Russia’s S-400 Is ‘the Best Missile System All-Around,’ U.S. Firm Says
https://www.theindianhawk.com/2021/02/r ... em-is.html
when populations resorts to compromising away actual life for their reality's sake, the species performing will provide its own self extinction eventually.
Did you see how many of Russia's SU-34s the Ukranians have knocked down?Hank » 20 Jul 2022, 3:53 am » wrote: ↑ Russians shot down their own jet...
It wasn't the fake ghost of kiev
Friendly fire is part of any conflict.
With Russia having one of the best air defense systems in the world, possibly the best ,it is no surprise they can shoot down their own jets.
Your post has nothing to do with anything said in the video
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ Did you see how many of Russia's SU-34s the Ukranians have knocked down?
Did you see the rate of production?
The cost?
And if the Russians are shooting down their own, there's a very serious problem with coordination.
This isn't darkening the skies with 100 Stukas....this is trading 40 million dollar assets for half million dollar missiles....and Russia is not in a position to do so for long.
Because, you dumb ****, when he first filmed it he thought they scored a hit against an enemy target.Hank » 20 Jul 2022, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ THere source is a Russian propagandist right?
Why would a Russian propagandist make such a report?
Think before you post *******
Even if that is true they still have air superiority you dumb **** dick sucker ...Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ Because, you dumb ****, when he first filmed it he thought they scored a hit against an enemy target.
The Russian Air Force is a **** mess.
Most of the damage the Russian have done they have done with some sort of missiles. They do not have control of the skies over Ukraine. Of course, fighter aircraft are increasingly more obsolete, considering that drones keep improving and because fighter aircraft need a trained pilot, who is likely to be killed if he is shot down.Hank » 20 Jul 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ Even if that is true they still have air superiority you dumb **** dick sucker ...
Calling black vegetable a dick sucker is like calling black vegetable by his name. It's like his alias around here. .Xavier_Onassis » 20 Jul 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ Most of the damage the Russian have done they have done with some sort of missiles. They do not have control of the skies over Ukraine. Of course, fighter aircraft are increasingly more obsolete, considering that drones keep improving and because fighter aircraft need a trained pilot, who is likely to be killed if he is shot down.
Whether someone sucks dicks or not is unrelated to the truth of statements they make.
You are more of a Boomhauer than a Hank. Or perhaps a Dale Gribble.
You can't ASSERT "air superiority", you must ESTABLISH it.Hank » 20 Jul 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ Even if that is true they still have air superiority you dumb **** dick sucker ...