Before we get started - when done, will you reciprocate?DeezerShoove » 20 Jul 2022, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, say something that indicates Biden is doing badly in some way.
1. Whine to someone who cares. I insist on being judged by a jury of LITERATE peers.Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. We already went through the judge biasness you stupid asshole. More evidence that you need **** repeated.
No cheating allowed. Why do I even have to say that?
But since you agreed, let's do it.
@GeorgeWashington @Annoyed Liberall . Are you prepared to judge? There is a challenge that I have for Veghead, he agreed.
2. More qualified than you.
What kind of inbred imbecile is a Canadian Trump Fluffer?one1zer0 » 20 Jul 2022, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ And the Blackvegetable remains in his bubble of irony and hypocrisy
Go piss up a rope, asshole.Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Before we get started - when done, will you reciprocate?
Not in response to a question of your own, but to mine....
Called your bluff, Coozie...
By NOT criticizing the prez?
Coozie,DeezerShoove » 20 Jul 2022, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ By NOT criticizing the prez?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By deflecting with "Before WE get started..." ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I put you on a spot you've been on a hundred times.
You stand there every time like a ****.
CP, Huey, Vegas (your fave) have smashed you like a bug on that same spot a lot.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Whine to someone who cares. I insist on being judged by a jury of LITERATE peers.
You wanna do this, or not?
2. You're a **** moron. I mean that.....Literally.
For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron?"
- Pic, which I easily cancel out.
- Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response.
- Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned.
- Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one.
- Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****.
- Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat.
- I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted.
1. Not negotiableVegas » 20 Jul 2022, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Prove AI or GW is not literate.
Yeah, that's what I thought. **** your cheating. AI/GW will judge unless you can prove they are illiterate.
We will wait for their reply, then it begins.
2. Oh look...another repost of you saying the same ****. QED. Here you go:
Huh? I asked you to do a simple thing.Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Coozie,
I offered to do so on the condition that you do the one thing you choose to make an issue.
You ducked.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Not negotiable
2. Stop denying you're a moron.
It's annoying..
For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron?"
- Pic, which I easily cancel out.
- Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response.
- Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned.
- Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one.
- Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****.
- Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat.
- I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted.
No, I said I would.DeezerShoove » 20 Jul 2022, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Huh? I asked you to do a simple thing.
You couldn't perform, simple **** asshole.
Instead you tried for the meandering weird dodge thing that you ALWAYS DO.
Face it. You're a **** loser.
It's not possible to duck you because you're always gone beforehand.
1. That's not cheatingVegas » 20 Jul 2022, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Acknowledge that you cannot win without cheating.
2. Another repost, QED. Here you go:
For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron?"
- Pic, which I easily cancel out.
- Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response.
- Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned.
- Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one.
- Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****.
- Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat.
- I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted.
I asked you for a simple criticism, not a goddamn contest.Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I said I would.
But you'd have to do the same.
I don't want to hear your excuses for being a **** puss-puss.
Either take the deal, or slink off like the cowardly piece of **** we both know you are.
1. Do your own **** work.Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Look up the word "bias" Mr Ivy League.
2. Same repost, as usual. QED. Here you go:
No...you couched your "question" in a bunch of **** I'm gonna oblige you to eat.DeezerShoove » 20 Jul 2022, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I asked you for a simple criticism, not a goddamn contest.
You can mealy-mouth this all day. I know what I asked.
You added "parameters" that I immediately laughed at (that means: didn't agree with).
Get ****, **** hypocrite.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Do your own **** work.
Are you suggesting that any literate and informed judge MUST favor me?
Think about why that is. Then stand in front of a mirror. Remove your shirt. Savor your disgust.
2. Kill yourself. You have no reason to take another breath.
DeezerShoove » 19 Jul 2022, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑ An entire day... He's afraid.
Total cherry-picking chicken **** little asshole.
![]()
![]()
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ No...you couched your "question" in a bunch of **** I'm gonna oblige you to eat.
If it's no biggie to answer a question TAKE THE DEAL.