Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 7:33 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 7:31 am

The guy saved lives.  A couple of points about this.

Indiana just changed their law concerning carrying.  On July 1 of this year you are no longer required to get a permit to carry in Indiana.  If the good guy did not have a permit this law came just in time. 

Also:"I don’t know who needs to hear this but when a 22-year-old illegally brings a loaded gun into a mall and kills a mass shooter armed with an AR-15 after he already killed three people and wounded others is not a ringing endorsement of our implementation of the Second Amendment," Moms Demand Action founder Shannon Watts said on Twitter.

It is not illegal to carry a gun in a business that restricts them.  BUT if you are asked to leave and you refuse then you may charged with criminal trespass. 

And last:

I wonder if this guy is friends with  @Blackvegetable  ?

"The Good Samaritan paid for an unknown immigrant's health care out of pocket," comedian John Fugelsang wrote on Twitter. "The Good Samaritan did not shoot anyone. Jesus was not a fan of killing for any reason, including self-defense. But if these ammosexuals had ever read the Bible, they couldn't support the GOP or NRA."

 

 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:53 am

I bet if you were in that situation you would love to have an ammosexual good Samaritan around.  Or you could tell him you don't believe in the Second Amendment rights to own a gun.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:11 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 8:53 am

I bet if you were in that situation you would love to have an ammosexual good Samaritan around.  Or you could tell him you don't believe in the Second Amendment rights to own a gun.

Thank heaven those AR 15 sporting thingys are so readily available. And it's not like the NATO 5.56 is good for anything else.

 

 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:14 am

The hero did not have an AR 15.  He had a handgun. By the way the 5.56x45 is good for hunting coyotes, hogs, smaller varmints.  

Oh, as a side note, the majority of mass shootings are committed with handguns.

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:14 am

The hero did not have an AR 15.  He had a handgun. By the way the 5.56x45 is good for hunting coyotes, hogs, smaller varmints.  

Oh, as a side note, the majority of mass shootings are committed with handguns.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:18 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:14 am

The hero did not have an AR 15. He had a handgun. By the way the 5.56x45 is good for hunting coyotes, hogs, smaller varmints.  

Oh, as a side note, the majority of mass shootings are committed with handguns.

The cosplayer did.



 

 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:22 am

FIFY

And he is dead.  It is reported the dead guy had an AR15 STYLE rifle. Note the word REPORTED.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:24 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 9:22 am

FIFY

And he is dead.  It is reported the dead guy had an AR15 STYLE rifle. Note the word REPORTED.

Don't bother.

Cosplayer wasn't toting a Ruger Mini.



 

 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:08 am

That will be the go to weapon.  As well as the ban compliant AR Style with the mean looking attachments removed.  But, you know it all.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:11 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:08 am

That will be the go to weapon.  As well as the ban compliant AR Style with the mean looking attachments removed.  But, you know it all.

How large a demographic is "Rancher Cosplayers".

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:20 am

You are missing the point. If AR style weapons are banned they will just go to another weapon. And as I pointed out the VA Tech shooter used handguns to kill 32 people and wound 17.  The VA beach mass shooter killed 12 and wounded 4.  All with handguns.  You need to ask your question AFTER you get your ban. 



https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resour ... shootings/
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 11:26 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 10:20 am

You are missing the point. If AR style weapons are banned they will just go to another weapon. And as I pointed out the VA Tech shooter used handguns to kill 32 people and wound 17.  The VA beach mass shooter killed 12 and wounded 4.  All with handguns.  You need to ask your question AFTER you get your ban. 



https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resour ... shootings/

 

Talking Point Free Zone

 

DeplorablePatriot » 18 Jul 2022, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2022, 11:25 pm

A man legally carrying a weapon saved lives by shooting and killing a mall gunman. Anti-gunners don't believe he should be called a "good Samaritan", basing that upon a bible passage.

Really? Anti-gunners are liberal airheads who bash the bible routinely. All of a sudden, it's a tool for them to bash a hero who saved lives. There's a special place for these anti-gun fanatics. It's called six feet...well, you know.  **** 'em all!

And **** all you liberals here as well. Find a rope and a closet.

Gun control advocates stunned man who allegedly shot Indiana mall shooter labeled 'Good Samaritan' | Fox News

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 11:30 am

Sorry, those are facts.  You don't like FACTS that go against YOUR talking points. The unfortunate FACT is the amount of is RIFLE ONLY shootings account for 13% of mass shootings.  And that is all rifles.  Not just the scary looking one you are afraid of.

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am

@Blackvegetable  

The facts that you used ST on are as follows. 65 people shot in 2 shootings and no scary looking rifle was used.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 11:47 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 11:30 am

Sorry, those are facts.  You don't like FACTS that go against YOUR talking points. The unfortunate FACT is the amount of is RIFLE ONLY shootings account for 13% of mass shootings.  And that is all rifles.  Not just the scary looking one you are afraid of.

Post my words.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 11:47 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am

@Blackvegetable  

The facts that you used ST on are as follows. 65 people shot in 2 shootings and no scary looking rifle was used.

Irrelevant. 
 
 

 

Huey » 19 Jul 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2022, 12:00 pm

You can do it.

Sorry, those are facts.  You don't like FACTS that go against YOUR talking points. The unfortunate FACT is the amount of RIFLE ONLY shootings account for 13% of mass shootings.  And that is all rifles.  Not just the scary looking one you are afraid of.