Liberal Forum

Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 8:43 pm

Yeah, I read that. This is more evidence that he has a bias against me and favors you. 

Boom! 

QED. 

AI/GW will judge.

Vegas,

Grab a chair.

Stand on it and look into the eyes of your wife's children.

They are saying the same.


Kill yourself....make them happy just ONE time...

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 8:47 pm

Vegas,

Grab a chair.

Stand on it and look into the eyes of your wife's children.

They are saying the same.

Kill yourself....make them happy just ONE time...

Yeah, I didn't think you could come back from that one. You and Ike both proved his bias. 

You should have thought things through before you opened your hole. 

 

Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 8:48 pm

Yeah, I didn't think you could come back from that one. You and Ike both proved his bias. 

You should have thought things through before you opened your hole.

Go find that chair...

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm

Go find that chair...

Too late for you. You both **** up. 


AI/GW will judge fairly...and you will lose...and then you will be begging cannon to come back. 

I will settle this. Vegas brings more original thought than BV, by far.

It’s not always quality thoughts, or interesting, but it’s more substance than what BV brings

Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 8:54 pm

Too late for you. You both **** up. 

AI/GW will judge fairly...and you will lose...and then you will be begging cannon to come back.

No appealing the Judges decision.

 

@Ike Bana  

Since you're the judge, this is posted for your consideration.

Look at the OP
viewtopic.php?p=2084710#p2084710

Now look at BV's actual response
viewtopic.php?p=2084623#p2084623

Vegas altered BV's post in his OP by omitting content and did not include a link to BV's post while including two links to his own post.

1) Dishonest presentation.
2) Lying by omission.
3) Altering post.
4) Accusations of cheating when Vegas, himself, is the one cheating.

I could go on. However, that's enough to render a judgement.

Vegas forfeits due to Vegas cheating in multiple ways. Yes, lying is cheating.

@Blackvegetable  
@Vegas  

 
 

Phelix_Dacat » 21 Jul 2022, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 7:02 am

@Ike Bana  

Since you're the judge, this is posted for your consideration.

Look at the OP
viewtopic.php?p=2084710#p2084710

Now look at BV's actual response
viewtopic.php?p=2084623#p2084623

Vegas altered BV's post in his OP by omitting content and did not include a link to BV's post while including two links to his own post.

1) Dishonest presentation.
2) Lying by omission.
3) Altering post.
4) Accusations of cheating when Vegas, himself, is the one cheating.

I could go on. However, that's enough to render a judgement.

Vegas forfeits due to Vegas cheating in multiple ways. Yes, lying is cheating.

@Blackvegetable  
@Vegas

Much appreciated.

Would have proposed you as well had I known you were still active...

 

Phelix_Dacat » 21 Jul 2022, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 7:02 am

@Ike Bana  

Since you're the judge, this is posted for your consideration.

Look at the OP
viewtopic.php?p=2084710#p2084710

Now look at BV's actual response
viewtopic.php?p=2084623#p2084623

Vegas altered BV's post in his OP by omitting content and did not include a link to BV's post while including two links to his own post.

1) Dishonest presentation.
2) Lying by omission.
3) Altering post.
4) Accusations of cheating when Vegas, himself, is the one cheating.

I could go on. However, that's enough to render a judgement.

Vegas forfeits due to Vegas cheating in multiple ways. Yes, lying is cheating.

@Blackvegetable  
@Vegas

     @Blackvegetable  
Nice try you cowards. 

GW/AI judges. Nobody cares that neither of you like it, Cry me a river.
 
 

Vegas » 21 Jul 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:08 am

     @Blackvegetable  
Nice try you cowards. 

GW/AI judges. Nobody cares that neither of you like it, Cry me a river.

Get lost..

Kill yourself. 

Come back better.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2022, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 8:03 pm

Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 7:56 pm

I said no cheating. Now stop with that ****! Why do I have to explain why you can't cheat? God man.

You have to explain why a literate, informed judge is "cheating"..

Then you have to call your uncle.
 

 

When you name a literate, informed, and UNBIASED judge before whining about it. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jul 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:10 am

Get lost..

Kill yourself. 

Come back better.

Nobody cares that you are scared ****. Nobody cares that you don't want a fair judge. Got it?

GW/AI...Period. Deal with it. You shouldn't have demanded to cheat, not my problem.

Nod.

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am

When you name a literate, informed, and UNBIASED judge before whining about it.

He already knows. He continues to evade the whole biased part intentionally. He knows damn well.

Vegas » 21 Jul 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:43 am

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am

When you name a literate, informed, and UNBIASED judge before whining about it.

He already knows. He continues to evade the whole biased part intentionally. He knows damn well.

 

And the poster he named is not that informed.  

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:45 am

And the poster he named is not that informed.

Veghead already knows all this. That's why he is demanding him. 

No matter how many times he evades the biased part of this, I will always bring it up...for no other reason than to trigger him. LOL

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am

When you name a literate, informed, and UNBIASED judge before whining about it.

I've named at least 2.


 

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:45 am

And the poster he named is not that informed.

Really?

Compared to whom, exactly?
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jul 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:07 pm

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:41 am

When you name a literate, informed, and UNBIASED judge before whining about it.

I've named at least 2.


 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jul 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:08 pm

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 11:45 am

And the poster he named is not that informed.

Really?

Compared to whom, exactly?
 

 

Bana ain't one of them.  

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:09 pm

Bana ain't one of them.

In whose judgment?
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jul 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:09 pm

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:09 pm

Bana ain't one of them.

In whose judgment?
 
 
 

 

Pound Sad, Askholio.