Liberal Forum

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm

Pound Sad, Askholio.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jul 2022, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:12 pm

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm

Pound Sad, Askholio.

If the opinion is an orphan, why should anyone give a ****?

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:13 pm

Pound Sand, Askholio.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:13 pm

Pound Sand, Askholio.

Under the porch is a very flattering look on you.

 

Huey » 21 Jul 2022, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 12:16 pm

I have told you multiple times and posted a pic.  Can't get under my porch.

Phelix_Dacat » 21 Jul 2022, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2022, 7:02 am

@Ike Bana  

Since you're the judge, this is posted for your consideration.

Look at the OP
viewtopic.php?p=2084710#p2084710

Now look at BV's actual response
viewtopic.php?p=2084623#p2084623

Vegas altered BV's post in his OP by omitting content and did not include a link to BV's post while including two links to his own post.

1) Dishonest presentation.
2) Lying by omission.
3) Altering post.
4) Accusations of cheating when Vegas, himself, is the one cheating.

I could go on. However, that's enough to render a judgement.

Vegas forfeits due to Vegas cheating in multiple ways. Yes, lying is cheating.

@Blackvegetable  
@Vegas

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2022, 9:14 am

Bump

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 05 Nov 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2022, 12:00 pm

LOL       

What makes you think I give a **** about what one of your own says? He lies also. So **** off with that ****.

Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2022, 7:48 pm

He finally agreed. It's been like a year. He finally agreed to the challenge without cheating. Life or death. 
@GeorgeWashington  ​​​ or @Annoyed Liberall  , would either of you mind judging? 

The challenge is very simple. The judge is to pick a random page of each of our OP threads and look to see which one of us has more thoughts of his own and commentary about the article or the topic of the OP. Noth through the whole thread, just the OPs. As you know, Veghead loves to have Google talk for him. He puts no mental effort into his OPs, just copy/pasted ****. 

Stipulations
1. Despite what Veghead's uneducated retarded *** thinks, titles do not count. I have tried to explain what the purpose of a title is, but he couldn't care less.
2. The commentary needs to be intelligent and relevant. So, that means things like "Grifty is a **** moron and so are his slackjawed supporters" does not count. There has to be some intelligent thought behind it. 
3. It isn't about whether you agree or disagree with our commentary, it's about whether we came up with on our own.

The one with the most OPs, on the random page you choose, who has original thoughts, wins. The other is banned for life. 

Real Media is Trying...Are You? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm

I will now present you with the DEFINING POST of Glory Hole Clem's career. You will be exposed to the difference between me, and the vast majority of right wing hacks on this board - the very worst elements of which are incorporated and incarnated (if he's human and not a bot) in the drivel we get from Glory Hole Clem. This is pasted from another thread:

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=171329#p171329 » wrote:RichClem»17Feb20142:38pm[/url]]

What, are you brain dead? The only sources you cited were for raw statistics, and the only thing supporting your wacky claim about Reagan and Carter is your ignorant, psychotic analysis.

Cite a mainstream source, i.e. opinion based on analysis, that backs up your claim that Carter was better on the economy than Reagan.

There it is, folks. There is Glory Hole Clem, in a nut shell.

He values "accepted" opinion over GENERATED opinion. A subject cannot be argued on its merits between us. We must always defer to authority. A PROPOSITION HAS LESS VALUE OR MORE VALUE BASED ON WHO IT COMES FROM.

Just think of it. His COMPLAINT is that my sources were only cited for raw statistics, and not opinions. That was his COMPLAINT - that I made my own case instead of repeating talking points generated elsewhere. 

And now you see what a chump this guy is, from his own mouth, in his own words. 

Please - vote in the poll.

Blackvegetable » 05 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm

What makes you believe anyone gives a **** what you think?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...