Get the **** out of here, CC.FOS » 22 Jul 2022, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Something loke a year ago he answered direct questions when he pretended that he read spengler and insisted I did not.
But I blew him away in that conversation. And it probably traumatized him. He's never been direct with me since.
spolier alert. I've read spengler, he hasnt
You can't "cancel out" objective evidence.
You can't "equalize it" either, **** idiot.Vegas » 22 Jul 2022, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I equalized it dickweed,. God man. In short, pot...kettle...black.
Nod.
You never addressed the second part. How come you low IQ people love repeating these old conversations all **** day..every day...for years?Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2022, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I have to revisit the same conversations 300k times because it's safe.
"Metaphor".....Vegas » 22 Jul 2022, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't expect you to comprehend the metaphor...you can't even define "bias."
Really? Show me. I don't think so. I pulled out my book and showed you the page he was speaking of.Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2022, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Get the **** out of here, CC.
We ran an index search....your topic covered 1,2 mentions?
Turns out you were reyapping something you found on GOOGLE.
Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2022, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Get the **** out of here, CC.
We ran an index search....your topic covered 1,2 mentions?
Turns out you were reyapping something you found on GOOGLE.
CC,FOS » 22 Jul 2022, 10:03 pm » wrote: ↑ show me your Google lol. I think yr ****.
At the end of the day I was right. I knew what spengler said. You did not. I could prove it from literally photographing my book.
You didn't care.
Cause yr a jew.
The page?FOS » 22 Jul 2022, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Really? Show me. I don't think so. I pulled out my book and showed you the page he was speaking of.
On a thread about you rarely answering questions you dimwittedly proved the point.
For the record BV will answer a rare question IF the answer is one where he gets to brag about how great he is at something.Vegas » 22 Jul 2022, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Has anyone received any direct answers from @Blackvegetable about any of your questions?
I have scrolled through threads, and I have seen perfectly reasonable questions asked by Neo, Warcock, Huey, Nafoarious, and a few more, where Veghead responded with either one of the following:If you have received a straight answer, please provide the post where I may find it.
- responded to your question with a question or a demand.
- "you are a **** imbecile."
- "You are a **** moron."
- "**** off."
- "blah blah blah Grifty."
Thank you and God bless.
And Veghead, **** your upcoming questions/demands to me. Rule 1, idiot.
How many times have you obliged me to state my case against making weapons designed for battle available to civilians?Huey » 23 Jul 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ For the record BV will answer a rare question IF the answer is one where he gets to brag about how great he is at something.
Can you demonstrate that?Huey » 23 Jul 2022, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ On a thread about you rarely answering questions you dimwittedly proved the point.
Weapons designed for battle are available to civilians. Called Class 3 NFA weapons. Those rifles you can buy at the pawn and gun shop are not designed for the battlefield.Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2022, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ How many times have you obliged me to state my case against making weapons designed for battle available to civilians?
I just did. Please follow along.