NOT in @ScottMon 's case !
You shouldn't ask Scottmon embarrassing questions like that, he can't deal wit that... he's a real retard, about the same level as wazoo I'd say...JinnMartini » 25 Jul 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ That is a given !
But maybe you can tell us in which part of the OP you are correct ?
ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ It's a numbers game. The vaccine gives you a fighting chance. If you were going to die and something gave you a 5% chance of surviving, would you not jump at it?
Most of my friends and family are double vaxxed. As much as I would love to be proven right the cost wouldn't be worth it. A pyrrhic victory that wouldn't give me any comfort. I hope I am wrong and there are no longer term ill effects.JinnMartini » 25 Jul 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ NOT in @ScottMon 's case !
He-she-it deserves all the **** that is coming his-her-its way, for all the lies she-he-it spread that hurt so many people!
ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ No one. Not Dr Fauci, Not WHO, No one.
Clarifying a tanti-vax talking point.
DID HE EVER CLAIM THAT MASK ARE NOT EFFECTIVEScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ You're too late. Neilcar corrected me. But the original point stands. Dr Fauci Never claimed that vaccines would stop you from getting the infection.
ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ I am incorrect. Biden was wrong. Thank you for the correction.
Not good enough, cock sucker. At this late stage, the fact that you were still parroting **** demonstrates your lack of concern for truth and for your own human dignity. You are a vapid, smug, entitled piece of **** who feels no duty to research before running your ball washer.ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ I am wrong. Thank you for correcting my false assumption.
And there you go again.ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ It's a numbers game. The vaccine gives you a fighting chance.
ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ It's a numbers game. The vaccine gives you a fighting chance. If you were going to die and something gave you a 5% chance of surviving, would you not jump at it?
Who told you that the vaccine “gives you a fighting chance”?ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑It's a numbers game. The vaccine gives you a fighting chance. If you were going to die and something gave you a 5% chance of surviving, would you not jump at it?Zeets2 » 25 Jul 2022, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, did the "established science" say that you could still catch it but you probably wouldn't die from it?
You think maybe these 10,000+ patients who died AFTER being fully vaccinated simply forgot to read your "established science"?:
Gee, too bad all these dead people were as gullible as you and believed a senile Biden and the corrupt Dr. Fauci, huh? If only they believed their **** as you did, they'd be fine today, right?
We sure as **** NEVER heard that phrase uttered by ANY Democrat as they ordered lockdowns and mask mandates and unconstitutional orders, did we?GeorgeWashington » 25 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Who told you that the vaccine “gives you a fighting chance”?
100 years of science and research.GeorgeWashington » 25 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Who told you that the vaccine “gives you a fighting chance”?
Smart people admit when they are wrong. Dumb people doubledown on wrong conclusions. The vaccine has been around for centuries and it is established science.Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ And there you go again.
The VERY NEXT POST after admitting that you had been UTTERLY deceived by your sources, you go DIRECTLY back to blithely quoting them.
And if someone murdered you, they would make THAT person out to be the bad guy. You are one dimwitted bag of ****, boi.
This type of vaccine has only been in use for ~2 years.ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑100 years of science and research.GeorgeWashington » 25 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Who told you that the vaccine “gives you a fighting chance”?
Pretty sure that is false.SJConspirator » 25 Jul 2022, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑ chance of dying from Covid for unvaxxed = 1%
chance of dying from Covid after vaccination = 10%
The vaccines we are using are standard practice for over hundred years. We don't have to worry about polio. And this new vaccine used Crispr technology that has been tested over 30 years. Two of the Covid-19 vaccines are totally inert. This is fact.GeorgeWashington » 25 Jul 2022, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ This type of vaccine has only been in use for ~2 years.
Where did you get the 100 year number?
**** get caught spewing, feel zero shame, continues blithely spewing.ScottMon » 25 Jul 2022, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Smart people admit when they are wrong. Dumb people doubledown on wrong conclusions. The vaccine has been around for centuries and it is established science.
Vaccines are a well established method of treating people. Before we have vaccines, We had an average life expectancy of 40 years.Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2022, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ **** get caught spewing, feel zero shame, continues blithely spewing.
You have the greatest sense of entitlement - you HAVE to be a bitch. Only someone with a ****** gets THAT **** complacent.
This piece of **** has gone from sure to pretty sure in his own busted out ****-thread. His hor mama would be mighty proud, if she was still around.