Liberal Forum

...ike and bv, firstly congrats on your excellent skills in exposing, embarrassing etc., the top puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers at this site...     

...but if this thing should end in a tie i propose we crown as champion the person who has exposed, embarrassed, etc., the the most odious of the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers...

...i'm open as to how we decide this...i propose we rank the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers who voted for us on the basis of odiousness, stupidity, their propensity to lie, etc.., and if, for example, there are 15 puppet trump c@cksuckers who voted for us, we reverse order so the person who received the vote from the number 1 rated puppet trump/republican c@cksucker was awarded 15 points...a vote from the number 2 c@cksucker is worth 14.........number 14 is worth 2 and number 15 only 1...

....the person with the highest score wins the runoff and will be crowned champion...

...think about it and we'll sweat the details later...
 

TB7 » 28 Jul 2022, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 12:38 pm

No win scenario directing win win propositions of inside the box governing everyone believing life evolves outside self contained to the moment here. Your wasted vote proves Back to self evident results denied by those saving humanity's laws demanding everyone comply with context or else be eliminated by any means necessary. Sound like the global chaos taking place historically and recorded to be used against the last generation by next generation already being trained to ignore how voting is conducted
 

wow, one of my posts played back. Adapt or become extinct is a no win scenario and the only win win situation is everyone understands how, why, what, where, when, which, who they remain in plain sight of evolving forward now. teacher used to to that one too many times where it doesn't work anymore when anyone else tries it.

Reality capitalizes off people ignoring the kinetic self evident way living works naturally happening here. Hope, faith, charity are seduction power, wealth, fame are sedition to corrupting each great great grandchild changing the entire population forward until no more arrive again accounting for each ancestor ever occupying time here now.

peepee » 28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm

...think about it and we'll sweat the details later...

of course you butt **** will "sweat" it out later. no one is gonna argue that. I can see the 3 of you taking turns on each other's "crack" pipe. This song describes the room you 3 will be packing each other in....sniff, sniff, what's that.....
https://youtu.be/thXXRkwTOmg

 
 

Vegas » 25 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2022, 10:51 am

The previous champ, VG, smeared the competition with 16 votes (I think. Ehhh...does it really matter when there was no close second?). 

Now that he is no longer in the race, let's see who are next champ will be.

Mr. Vegas,

Your poll has triggered the 3 STOOGES. It's true..........this post from ike and bv's pivot man peepee proves it

peepee

...ike and bv, firstly congrats on your excellent skills in exposing, embarrassing etc., the top puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers at this site...     

...but if this thing should end in a tie i propose we crown as champion the person who has exposed, embarrassed, etc., the the most odious of the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers...

...i'm open as to how we decide this...i propose we rank the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers who voted for us on the basis of odiousness, stupidity, their propensity to lie, etc.., and if, for example, there are 15 puppet trump c@cksuckers who voted for us, we reverse order so the person who received the vote from the number 1 rated puppet trump/republican c@cksucker was awarded 15 points...a vote from the number 2 c@cksucker is worth 14.........number 14 is worth 2 and number 15 only 1...

....the person with the highest score wins the runoff and will be crowned champion...

...think about it and we'll sweat the details later...


 
 

omh » 28 Jul 2022, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 3:55 pm

wow, one of my posts played back. Adapt or become extinct is a no win scenario and the only win win situation is everyone understands how, why, what, where, when, which, who they remain in plain sight of evolving forward now. teacher used to to that one too many times where it doesn't work anymore when anyone else tries it.

Reality capitalizes off people ignoring the kinetic self evident way living works naturally happening here. Hope, faith, charity are seduction power, wealth, fame are sedition to corrupting each great great grandchild changing the entire population forward until no more arrive again accounting for each ancestor ever occupying time here now.

wow...who would have thought?
 

TB7 » 28 Jul 2022, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 5:12 pm

wow...who would have thought?
 

gee sarcasm and rhetorical question at the same time. Your brain is showing signs of reactivation.

peepee » 28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm

...think about it and we'll sweat the details later...

 

TB7 » 28 Jul 2022, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 5:06 pm

Mr. Vegas,

Your poll has triggered the 3 STOOGES. It's true..........this post from ike and bv's pivot man peepee proves it

peepee

...ike and bv, firstly congrats on your excellent skills in exposing, embarrassing etc., the top puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers at this site...     

...but if this thing should end in a tie i propose we crown as champion the person who has exposed, embarrassed, etc., the the most odious of the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers...

...i'm open as to how we decide this...i propose we rank the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers who voted for us on the basis of odiousness, stupidity, their propensity to lie, etc.., and if, for example, there are 15 puppet trump c@cksuckers who voted for us, we reverse order so the person who received the vote from the number 1 rated puppet trump/republican c@cksucker was awarded 15 points...a vote from the number 2 c@cksucker is worth 14.........number 14 is worth 2 and number 15 only 1...

....the person with the highest score wins the runoff and will be crowned champion...

...think about it and we'll sweat the details later...

Perfect, sounds great. A tie is unacceptable. We will implement your idea. I think there may be a few more voters from the other site coming, so let's wait a couple days.

IkeBana » 28 Jul 2022, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 12:48 pm

Yeh...some of your best friends are ******...eh bluto?

You don't have to have the stones to come right out and say it...it's already crystal clear.

Aren't some of your best friends polacks?

Stoopid shrink... damn, maybe I shouldn't have voted for peepee...

 


 
 
 

peepee » 28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm

...ike and bv, firstly congrats on your excellent skills in exposing, embarrassing etc., the top puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers at this site...   

On the other hand... I think I made the right decision...

 



 
 

It looks like @Ike Bana  pulled ahead. Good job Ike!

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:48 am

It doesn't matter if you don't understand. 

Allow me to demonstrate 

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family

how many families, Tiny?

1.  A month ago it was established the AR 15 SP1 was a variant of the Colt M16.  

2.  That means it is part of the Colt Family.

3.  By the US Government definition thru the DOD the SP1 is not an assault weapon OR a weapon designed for the battlefield.  It is like the Mustang V6.  It looks like a GT but does not perform as one.  The SP1 looks like an M16 but does not perform as one.  Not even close,

4.  You have never shot an M16 and it is a safe bet you have never shot an SP1 or any UNRELATED AR 15 style weapon that is not part of the Colt Family.

5.  Today’s AR 15s that are manufactured by other companies ARE NOT part of the ColtFamily of Rifles,

That being said the SP1 or the AR15 style weapons WERE NOT designed for the battlefield, are not assault weapons, are simple semiautomatics, and should not be banned.

peepee » 28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 2:58 pm

...ike and bv, firstly congrats on your excellent skills in exposing, embarrassing etc., the top puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers at this site...     

...but if this thing should end in a tie i propose we crown as champion the person who has exposed, embarrassed, etc., the the most odious of the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers...

...i'm open as to how we decide this...i propose we rank the puppet trump/republican c@cksuckers who voted for us on the basis of odiousness, stupidity, their propensity to lie, etc.., and if, for example, there are 15 puppet trump c@cksuckers who voted for us, we reverse order so the person who received the vote from the number 1 rated puppet trump/republican c@cksucker was awarded 15 points...a vote from the number 2 c@cksucker is worth 14.........number 14 is worth 2 and number 15 only 1...

....the person with the highest score wins the runoff and will be crowned champion...

...think about it and we'll sweat the details later...

Can I change my vote?  

With the stupidity you just posted, it's clear that you belong right at the top spot and should share the "crown" with both bv and Ike.
 

Huey » 20 Aug 2022, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2022, 9:46 am

1.  A month ago it was established the AR 15 SP1 was a variant of the Colt M16.  

2.  That means it is part of the Colt Family.

3.  By the US Government definition thru the DOD the SP1 is not an assault weapon OR a weapon designed for the battlefield.  It is like the Mustang V6.  It looks like a GT but does not perform as one.  The SP1 looks like an M16 but does not perform as one.  Not even close,

4.  You have never shot an M16 and it is a safe bet you have never shot an SP1 or any UNRELATED AR 15 style weapon that is not part of the Colt Family.

5.  Today’s AR 15s that are manufactured by other companies ARE NOT part of the ColtFamily of Rifles,

That being said the SP1 or the AR15 style weapons WERE NOT designed for the battlefield, are not assault weapons, are simple semiautomatics, and should not be banned.

No mixing and matching.

It isn't a chinese menu.

The definition for legal purposes is ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT to the issue of the design.


 

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2022, 10:06 am

No mixing and matching.

It isn't a chinese menu.

The definition for legal purposes is ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT to the issue of the design.

That post was made a month ago.

Again, you don’t get to determine what is relevant or isn’t to suit your lies.

The Colt SP1 was not designed for the battlefield.  If it was it would not be, like the semi auto sports rifles made today, sold to civilians.

And remember, variant means something is different in the design.

Huey » 20 Aug 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2022, 10:47 am

That post was made a month ago.

Again, you don’t get to determine what is relevant or isn’t to suit your lies.

The Colt SP1 was not designed for the battlefield.  If it was it would not be, like the semi auto sports rifles made today, sold to civilians.

And remember, variant means something is different in the design.

Yes I do..

Because

1) you can't read

2) you're a chronic liar.

 

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2022, 10:56 am

Yes I do..

Because

1) you can't read

2) you're a chronic liar.

That post was made a month ago.

Again, you don’t get to determine what is relevant or isn’t to suit your lies.

The Colt SP1 was not designed for the battlefield.  If it was it would not be, like the semi auto sports rifles made today, sold to civilians.


And remember, variant means something is different in the design.

You lost.  Read my sig for the definition of variant.

Huey » 20 Aug 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2022, 10:58 am

That post was made a month ago.

Again, you don’t get to determine what is relevant or isn’t to suit your lies.

The Colt SP1 was not designed for the battlefield.  If it was it would not be, like the semi auto sports rifles made today, sold to civilians.

And remember, variant means something is different in the design.

You lost.  Read my sig for the definition of variant.

Tiny,

The citation is unambiguous and requires no qualification by someone who can't read.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2022, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2022, 11:00 am

Tiny,

The citation is unambiguous and requires no qualification by someone who can't read.

That post was made a month ago.

Again, you don’t get to determine what is relevant or isn’t to suit your lies.

The Colt SP1 was not designed for the battlefield.  If it was it would not be, like the semi auto sports rifles made today, sold to civilians.

And remember, variant means something is different in the design.

You lost.  Read my sig for the definition of variant.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2022, 10:56 am

Yes I do..

Because

1) you can't read

2) you're a chronic liar.

 

watching 2 persons debate a hypothetical way of life vs actual evolving equally inhabiting the moment here separately. 1 is a chronic liar the other a habitual denier together both ignore the same thing, why pick a side to protect the ideology and defend all other interpretations of life believing living isn't limited to only occupying space now?