Liberal Forum

A bunch of pansy Reich-wingnutz decide to take a vote on who they don't like the most and call that person stupid. IQ determination by unpopularity contest decided by the Dunning-Kruger kkkrew.

bwahahahahahaha

Thread fail.

Phelix_Dacat » 26 Jul 2022, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 7:06 am

A bunch of pansy Reich-wingnutz decide to take a vote on who they don't like the most and call that person stupid. IQ determination by unpopularity contest decided by the Dunning-Kruger kkkrew.

bwahahahahahaha

Thread fail.

You havent even got one vote yet.  
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2022, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2022, 6:53 pm

Until you find the balls to answer the question,  why don't you can that tripe.

I have answered that question AND the question about lowers came before YOUR TRIPE.  So find YOUR balls lil man.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 7:28 am

I have answered that question AND the question about lowers came before YOUR TRIPE.  So find YOUR balls lil man.

In the retelling..

So, just to be clear..

This "lowers" issue 

What EXACTLY is your argument?

As I recall it goes something like

"Viewed from the left, the SP1 is no longer a VARIANT."

Is that about right?


See what I did there?

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 6:12 am

yea...you do...

But you don't even do that. You just assert so. You can't post any specific examples because if you do, everyone will see that the problem is never me, or my post - it is ALWAYS your Stupid.


Go ahead....try it.

You both play the same game. League of deniers franchising realities every ancestor has to pay to get into or else. Either with me or against us serving 6 degrees of separation methodology and anyone not complying will be surrounded by 14 degrees of cast out of God, Country, Community, Family.

I can even move that up to 30 ways to eliminate anyone not obeying humanity's precedences of time is money.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:03 am

In the retelling..

So, just to be clear..

This "lowers" issue 

What EXACTLY is your argument?

As I recall it goes something like

"Viewed from the left, the SP1 is no longer a VARIANT."

Is that about right?

See what I did there?

No, you were asked to post the differences.  
 

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:10 am

No, you were asked to post the differences.

Why?
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:12 am

Why?

Already told you.  And the answer.  Those design and FUNCTION differences destroy your entire argument.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:13 am

Already told you.  And the answer.  Those design and FUNCTION differences destroy your entire argument.

Got sand?
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:17 am

Got sand?

Lol!  

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:18 am

Lol!

I don't play your Already game.

And if you do, don't expect me to play your Question Demand game.

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:22 am

I don't play your Already game.

And if you do, don't expect me to play your Question Demand game.

Nod.

That’s ok.  Another rule from you.  No problem.  I accept your surrender.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:26 am

That’s ok.  Another rule from you.  No problem.  I accept your surrender.

You have rules, I have standards.

It is a fact that you want to argue that the SP1, listed as an AR-15 variant, is a discreet design - IF VIEWED FROM THE LEFT.

For reasons I can't fathom, you believe this is a suggestion worth entertaining.

It isn't. 

Nod.

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:30 am

You have rules, I have standards.

It is a fact that you want to argue that the SP1, listed as an AR-15 variant, is a discreet design - IF VIEWED FROM THE LEFT.

For reasons I can't fathom, you believe this is a suggestion worth entertaining.

It isn't. 

Nod.

No, that’s a big reason it is different on the left AND just as importantly, from the inside.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:30 am

You have rules, I have standards.

It is a fact that you want to argue that the SP1, listed as an AR-15 variant, is a discreet design - IF VIEWED FROM THE LEFT.

For reasons I can't fathom, you believe this is a suggestion worth entertaining.

It isn't. 

Nod.

 

ha ha ha ha. Your standards don't match natural time when occupying space here now.. That is on you for not understanding self evident displacement as proportionately alive in this atmosphere equally living as one of a kind.

Vegas » 25 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2022, 10:51 am

The previous champ, VG, smeared the competition with 16 votes (I think. Ehhh...does it really matter when there was no close second?). 

Now that he is no longer in the race, let's see who are next champ will be.

This is a tough one !

I reserve the right to vote at a later stage !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay  . . . 

@nuckin futz  gets my vote !

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 8:33 am

No, that’s a big reason it is different on the left AND just as importantly, from the inside.

So, a weapon that IS LISTED AS A VARIANT, is a DESIGN depending on the perspective of the viewer.


Is that your argument?
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 6:12 am

yea...you do...

But you don't even do that. You just assert so. You can't post any specific examples because if you do, everyone will see that the problem is never me, or my post - it is ALWAYS your Stupid.

Go ahead....try it.

Are you seriously saying that if I randomly choose one of your OPs, that it won't be a copy/paste with no level 2+ commentary of your own? 

I will try it, and when you lose, you leave the forum forever. 

Deal?

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 9:40 am

So, a weapon that IS LISTED AS A VARIANT, is a DESIGN depending on the perspective of the viewer.

Is that your argument?

Variant meaning it is different in some way.  Also, it is does meet the US Military’s definition of an assault rifle.  And if you recall the US Military is part of the DOD which is part of the government.  So it is the US Government definition.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 9:54 am

Variant meaning it is different in some way.  Also, it is does meet the US Military’s definition of an assault rifle.  And if you recall the US Military is part of the DOD which is part of the government.  So it is the US Government definition.

No...variant as it applies to the taxonomy of weapons..

Nod.