Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:04 am

No...variant as it applies to the taxonomy of weapons..

Nod.

No, a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

Nod.

The standard being a weapon that has a cyclic rate of fire of 750-800 rounds a minute if a continuous feed of rounds was possible with one trigger pull.

The Ar 15 does not meet that definition.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:04 am

No...variant as it applies to the taxonomy of weapons..

Nod.

Looks like your Rogan thread backfired.         Too bad for you that it's pinned. Now you will be publicly embarrassed for a day. 

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless leftwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

1. refute it. 
2. acknowledge that the only reason you continue to repost this is because trashing your media triggers you something fierce.

I vote omh because he can't even master one language. Even gorillas can learn sign language, omh mangles English syntax and grammar beyond belief

Vegas » 26 Jul 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:17 am

Looks like your Rogan thread backfired.         Too bad for you that it's pinned. Now you will be publicly embarrassed for a day. 

Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

1. refute it. 
2. acknowledge that the only reason you continue to repost this is because trashing your media triggers you something fierce.

You assert a lot of stupid ****.

Then decline to even try to support it.

Because you are a coward.
 

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:14 am

No, a form or version of something that differs in some respect from other forms of the same thing or from a standard.

Nod.

The standard being a weapon that has a cyclic rate of fire of 750-800 rounds a minute if a continuous feed of rounds was possible with one trigger pull.

The Ar 15 does not meet that definition.

 

Tiny,

This is about weapons, not decorative items.


 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:21 am

Then decline to even try to support it.


 

You have yet to support your assertion that this is ****. How many times have you been challenged to refute it now..all to no avail. 

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless leftwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:22 am

Tiny,

This is about weapons, not decorative items.

Since you are now lining out key facts I accept your surrender.

for the record this is not decorative:

The standard being a weapon that has a cyclic rate of fire of 750-800 rounds a minute if a continuous feed of rounds was possible with one trigger pull.

The Ar 15 does not meet that definition.

Remeber this:The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle, examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire M2 Carbines are not assault rifles; their effective range is only 180 metres (200 yd).[19]
• Select-fire rifles such as the Fedorov Avtomat, FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

 

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:25 am

Since you are now lining out key facts I accept your surrender.

for the record this is not decorative:

The standard being a weapon that has a cyclic rate of fire of 750-800 rounds a minute if a continuous feed of rounds was possible with one trigger pull.

The Ar 15 does not meet that definition.

Remeber this:The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle, examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire M2 Carbines are not assault rifles; their effective range is only 180 metres (200 yd).[19]
• Select-fire rifles such as the Fedorov Avtomat, FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

Huey...you know, as well anyone, that this is way too long for him to read. He will be strike troughing most if it while calling it "assertion."

Vegas » 25 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2022, 10:51 am

The previous champ, VG, smeared the competition with 16 votes (I think. Ehhh...does it really matter when there was no close second?). 

Now that he is no longer in the race, let's see who are next champ will be.

Looks like @Ike Bana  is taking the lead!  Probably the first contest in his life he has a chance at winning.

Skans » 26 Jul 2022, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:30 am

Looks like @Ike Bana  is taking the lead!  Probably the first contest in his life he has a chance at winning.

Actually, BV has 4. Johndnorth voted for him, but it was erased because I had to edit it to add omh. 

Vegas » 26 Jul 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:28 am

Huey...you know, as well anyone, that this is way too long for him to read. He will be strike troughing most if it while calling it "assertion."

He showed his ignorance when he lined out my post and call function and performance decorative.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:36 am

He showed his ignorance when he lined out my post and call function and performance decorative.

He makes an *** out of himself every single time he comments on a post without reading it. Every.single. time. 

Watch: his response to this will be: "that is your assertion. prove it." He really should win this poll. 

IKE with a "commanding lead" heading into the home stretch......he must have said something incredibly stupid since this poll began...?
Like how Ike one one hand says that GUN VIOLENCE IS OUT OF CONTROL IN CHICAGO...THEN ON THE OTHER HAND IKE CLAIMS HE HAS LIVED IN CHICAGO FOR MANY YEARS AND HAS NEVER NEEDED TO DEFEND HIMSELF FROM ANY GUN PLAY

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:25 am

Since you are now lining out key facts I accept your surrender.

for the record this is not decorative:

The standard being a weapon that has a cyclic rate of fire of 750-800 rounds a minute if a continuous feed of rounds was possible with one trigger pull.

The Ar 15 does not meet that definition.

Remeber this:The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle, examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire M2 Carbines are not assault rifles; their effective range is only 180 metres (200 yd).[19]
• Select-fire rifles such as the Fedorov Avtomat, FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

No, Tiny.

I don't care about your reframings.

I can read, and understand what the citation says.

Your "argument" is patently ridiculous. 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:58 am

No, Tiny.

I don't care about your reframings.

I can read, and understand what the citation says.

Your "argument" is patently ridiculous.

No, my argument is based on facts that you can not refute.  You lose gunophobe.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:59 am

No, my argument is based on facts that you can not refute.  You lose gunophobe.

Your speculations and reframings are dispensed with by citation.

Entertain whatever fantasy you like, but whether viewed from left or right, the sp1 is an AR-15 VARIANT, by definition.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:13 am

Your speculations and reframings are dispensed with by citation.

Entertain whatever fantasy you like, but whether viewed from left or right, the sp1 is an AR-15 VARIANT, by definition.

Of course it is a variant.  I gave you the definition of variant.  But it is different and by definition not an assault rifle based on PERFORMANCE,  NOD.

As I told you quite some time the Mustang V6 is a VARIANT Of the GT 5.0.  And as one who has owned BOTH they do not have the same performance,

You May leave now with your tail between your legs.
 

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:18 am

Of course it is a variant.  I gave you the definition of variant.  But it is different and by definition not an assault rifle based on PERFORMANCE,  NOD.

As I told you quite some time the Mustang V6 is a VARIANT Of the GT 5.0.  And as one who has owned BOTH they do not have the same performance,

You May leave now with your tail between your legs.

Yes.

Now we're done here.

Your qualifications are irrelevant. 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:22 am

Yes.

Now we're done here.

Your qualifications are irrelevant.

Glad you are taking the L, DEMA,

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:23 am

Glad you are taking the L, DEMA,

Tiny,

You just stipulated to MY argument. 

The rest of it is **** you cobble together in the belief that it qualifies the simple fact.

It doesn't. 

No matter how much you want it.