Liberal Forum

Vegas » 26 Jul 2022, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 10:23 am

You have yet to support your assertion that this is ****. How many times have you been challenged to refute it now..all to no avail.

According to whom have I not refuted it?

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:26 am

Tiny,

You just stipulated to MY argument. 

The rest of it is **** you cobble together in the belief that it qualifies the simple fact.

It doesn't. 

No matter how much you want it.

I told you a long time ago it was a variant when I gave the Mustang comparison.  Wanna see?

You post your question Metldown Mary.  I already answered.  Demanding the answer over and over to the same question is not going to change it.  

Here is an example.  The six cylinder mustang is based on the Mustang GT.   It does not make a Mustang GT.  

viewtopic.php?p=2052581#p2052581

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:31 am

According to whom have I not refuted it?

Unbelievable. Like I would expect you to reply with honesty. Duh

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:34 am

I told you a long time ago it was a variant when I gave the Mustang comparison. Wanna see?

You post your question Metldown Mary.  I already answered.  Demanding the answer over and over to the same question is not going to change it.  

Here is an example.  The six cylinder mustang is based on the Mustang GT.   It does not make a Mustang GT.  

viewtopic.php?p=2052581#p2052581

Nod.

The term of art DOES NOT APPLY TO AUTOMIBILES, you stupid **** piece of ****.

Stop yapping about Mustangs, Slack Jawed Idiot.

Vegas » 26 Jul 2022, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:38 am

Unbelievable. Like I would expect you to reply with honesty. Duh

Only according to you.

You are a moron.

Ya follah?
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:38 am

Only according to you.

You are a moron.

Ya follah?

Prove it. 

Ya follah? 

Nod.

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless leftwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

1. refute it , no cop-outs allowed. 
2. acknowledge that the only reason you continue to repost this is because trashing your media triggers you something fierce.

Vegas » 26 Jul 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:41 am

Prove it. 

Ya follah? 

Nod.

Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

1. refute it , no cop-outs allowed. 
2. acknowledge that the only reason you continue to repost this is because trashing your media triggers you something fierce.

You just posted some of the mounds of evidence.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:43 am

You just posted some of the mounds of evidence.

Then **** prove it. Nobody asked for your assertion or opinion. Do it. 

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless leftwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

1. refute it , no cop-outs allowed. 
2. acknowledge that the only reason you continue to repost this is because trashing your media triggers you something fierce.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:38 am

The term of art DOES NOT APPLY TO AUTOMIBILES, you stupid **** piece of ****.

Stop yapping about Mustangs, Slack Jawed Idiot.

Term of art is a variant of variant!  LMAO!  And as you been shown even that term is about differences.  

Shut the **** about topics your **** clueless.  But if you want to continue I will keep embarrassing you.  No problem.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:44 am

Term of art is a variant of variant!  LMAO!  And as you been shown even that term is about differences.  

Shut the **** about topics your **** clueless.  But if you want to continue I will keep embarrassing you.  No problem.

It doesn't matter if you don't understand. 

Allow me to demonstrate 


the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family

how many families, Tiny?
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:48 am

It doesn't matter if you don't understand. 

Allow me to demonstrate 

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family

how many families, Tiny?

Did you read any of what you crossed out or are you content with making an *** of yourself...as usual?

Vegas » 26 Jul 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:53 am

Did you read any of what you crossed out or are you content with making an *** of yourself...as usual?

I wasn't addressing you, ****.

Staple it.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:48 am

It doesn't matter if you don't understand. 

Allow me to demonstrate 

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family

how many families, Tiny?

1.  A month ago it was established the AR 15 SP1 was a variant of the Colt M16.  

2.  That means it is part of the Colt Family.

3.  By the US Government definition thru the DOD the SP1 is not an assault weapon OR a weapon designed for the battlefield.  It is like the Mustang V6.  It looks like a GT but does not perform as one.  The SP1 looks like an M16 but does not perform as one.  Not even close,

4.  You have never shot an M16 and it is a safe bet you have never shot an SP1 or any UNRELATED AR 15 style weapon that is not part of the Colt Family.

5.  Today’s AR 15s that are manufactured by other companies ARE NOT part of the Colt Family of Rifles,

That being said the SP1 or the AR15 style weapons WERE NOT designed for the battlefield, are not assault weapons, are simple semiautomatics, and should not be banned.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:54 am

I wasn't addressing you, ****.

Staple it.

You weren't addressing anything. How can you when you don't read anything?

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless leftwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

1. refute it , no cop-outs allowed. 
2. acknowledge that the only reason you continue to repost this is because trashing your media triggers you something fierce.

Vegas » 26 Jul 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:55 am

You weren't addressing anything. How can you when you don't read anything?

Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

1. refute it , no cop-outs allowed. 
2. acknowledge that the only reason you continue to repost this is because trashing your media triggers you something fierce.

He's like you.

Just reposts the same ****, over and over.

You're both morons.
 

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:55 am

1.  A month ago it was established the AR 15 SP1 was a variant of the Colt M16.  

2.  That means it is part of the Colt Family.

3.  By the US Government definition thru the DOD the SP1 is not an assault weapon OR a weapon designed for the battlefield.  It is like the Mustang V6.  It looks like a GT but does not perform as one.  The SP1 looks like an M16 but does not perform as one.  Not even close,

4.  You have never shot an M16 and it is a safe bet you have never shot an SP1 or any UNRELATED AR 15 style weapon that is not part of the Colt Family.

5.  Today’s AR 15s that are manufactured by other companies ARE NOT part of the Colt Family of Rifles,

That being said the SP1 or the AR15 style weapons WERE NOT designed for the battlefield, are not assault weapons, are simple semiautomatics, and should not be banned.

DESIGN, VARIANT.

Every citation.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 12:01 pm

DESIGN, VARIANT.

Every citation.

Who said other wise?  The. You can get to the lowers.

I’m going to post that again just to give you another chance to look less like an ***.

1.  A month ago it was established the AR 15 SP1 was a variant of the Colt M16.  

2.  That means it is part of the Colt Family.

3.  By the US Government definition thru the DOD the SP1 is not an assault weapon OR a weapon designed for the battlefield.  It is like the Mustang V6.  It looks like a GT but does not perform as one.  The SP1 looks like an M16 but does not perform as one.  Not even close,

4.  You have never shot an M16 and it is a safe bet you have never shot an SP1 or any UNRELATED AR 15 style weapon that is not part of the Colt Family.

5.  Today’s AR 15s that are manufactured by other companies ARE NOT part of the Colt Family of Rifles,

That being said the SP1 or the AR15 style weapons WERE NOT designed for the battlefield, are not assault weapons, are simple semiautomatics, and should not be banned.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:57 am

He's like you.

Just reposts the same ****, over and over.

You're both morons.

               

@Huey  he is accusing us of what he is guilty of again. You know what that means. Meltdown Mary is coming in 3...2...1...

Blackvegetable » 26 Jul 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 11:57 am

He's like you.

Just reposts the same ****, over and over.

You're both morons.

Coming from the idiot that continues repost VARIANT, DESIGN over and over again after a almost two months ago it was agreed to.

Huey » 26 Jul 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2022, 12:10 pm

Coming from the idiot that continues repost VARIANT, DESIGN over and over again after a almost two months ago it was agreed to.

37X, please.

It's black & white.

It's over.

You lost.

My argument is impervious to challenge.

Live with it.