Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am

Why not Liz Cheney or Adam Kinzinger?

They haven't been shot or threatened with life in prison for airing dirty laundry. 
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:00 am

Why not Liz Cheney or Adam Kinzinger?

Why not stop asking questions and start answering some? 

Oh yeah, because that would require you to defend your claims. You would prefer to be the one attacking. 

**** coward. 

Neo » 28 Jul 2022, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 9:58 am

Let's ask Edward Snowden if he agrees with your assessment. Grab a ouija board and ask Seth Rich.

I am not saying that the US permits total freedom of expression, only that it permits far more than Russia, which is the theme of this discussion.
Snowdon is alive. He was not tortured, not poisoned and has earned $1.2 million in speaking fees in the US and elsewhere.

In Russia, he would likely be dead.

Neo » 28 Jul 2022, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:03 am

They haven't been shot or threatened with life in prison for airing dirty laundry. 
 

yet.

Xavier_Onassis » 28 Jul 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:07 am

I am not saying that the US permits total freedom of expression, only that it permits far more than Russia, which is the theme of this discussion.
Snowdon is alive. He was not tortured, not poisoned and has earned $1.2 million in speaking fees in the US and elsewhere.

In Russia, he would likely be dead.

And in Russia, Putin turned Assange into a tool of the Kremlin!
And he can never be trusted!      
 

Who trusts Putin?
Assange is not a spreader of falsehoods.

Neo » 28 Jul 2022, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:03 am

They haven't been shot or threatened with life in prison for airing dirty laundry.

I thought the issue was  the suppression of free speech.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:22 am

I thought the issue was  the suppression of free speech.

I deem free speech is harmed when the speaker is killed, maimed, imprisoned or threatened by the government. Don't you?

Xavier_Onassis » 28 Jul 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:13 am

Who trusts Putin?
Assange is not a spreader of falsehoods.

I meant to say Assange cannot be trusted. But Putin; NEVER!
Pre-Russia, Assange was great, now, has been compromised by Pootie.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 28 Jul 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:25 am

I deem free speech is harmed when the speaker is killed, maimed, imprisoned or threatened by the government. Don't you?

weak syllogism there Xavier.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 7:00 am

J&J is CLEARLY the inferior alternative. Both with respect to efficacy and side effects.

You don't have the essentials to make an informed decision, and you just announced it to the world.

Like the world gives one turd about our little group of the bored and disgruntled? Go away, Beto's laplicker.

I am sure Assange was careful about what he said about at least some subjects.
He is presently in prison in London. The US wants to extradite him, he has opposed this since 2019.

Perhaps you ahev confused him with Snowden, who was in exile in Russia.

Xavier_Onassis » 28 Jul 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:07 am

I am not saying that the US permits total freedom of expression, only that it permits far more than Russia, which is the theme of this discussion.
Snowdon is alive. He was not tortured, not poisoned and has earned $1.2 million in speaking fees in the US and elsewhere.

In Russia, he would likely be dead.

Like Seth Rich. 

All censorship is bad. You cant have beneficial cancer. 
 

DeplorablePatriot » 28 Jul 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:34 am

Like the world gives one turd about our little group of the bored and disgruntled? Go away, Beto's laplicker.

Beto has had absolutely no influence on my thinking whatsoever 

Neo » 28 Jul 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:48 am

Like Seth Rich. 

All censorship is bad. You cant have beneficial cancer.

Like Seth Rich what?
 

Xavier_Onassis » 28 Jul 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:25 am

I deem free speech is harmed when the speaker is killed, maimed, imprisoned or threatened by the government. Don't you?

Silenced regardless of method. Think the whole rona thing demonstrated how far we have fallen. The only way to counter misinformation is fact, not censorship. 
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:50 am

Like Seth Rich what?

Murdered for leaking DNC dirty laundry to Assange. 
 

Neo » 28 Jul 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:56 am

Murdered for leaking DNC dirty laundry to Assange.

But that's complete ****, Q

Neo » 28 Jul 2022, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 10:54 am

Silenced regardless of method. Think the whole rona thing demonstrated how far we have fallen. The only way to counter misinformation is fact, not censorship.

Are you suggesting that you are amenable to edification?

Blackvegetable » 28 Jul 2022, 5:02 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2022, 5:02 am

please don't defile their sacrifice, anti-american scum

Not that we would expect you to reply with anything intelligent, but have you considered the possibility that our freedoms have significantly declined since our forefathers? 

We can thank you lefties for your cancel culture and how butt-hurt you all get with opposing views. 


Watch this:
1. Strikethrough
2. "You are a **** imbecile."

Thus QED. 


@Huey  how many greenies would you like to bet that after he strikes-through, he will demand examples...which are right there in the strikethrough. LOL