Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:14 am

It's just StreamofTiny.

That's not how a man does it.

Besides, the premise is idiotic.

THAT is not how a man does it.

You have been given this premise before with links.  YOU need to post sources that show Madison did not do this.

 
 

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:19 am

THAT is not how a man does it.

You have been given this premise before with links.  YOU need to post sources that show Madison did not do this.

It's ****, Tiny.


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:31 am

It's ****, Tiny.

Ok.  You are saying Madison did not do that.  Here is one  of many links.

https://fee.org/articles/firearms-techn ... amendment/

Also run in WAPO

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/vol ... amendment/

 

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:34 am

Ok.  You are saying Madison did not do that.  Here is one  of many links.

https://fee.org/articles/firearms-techn ... amendment/

Also run in WAPO

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/vol ... amendment/

Why do you believe posting the same **** twice matters?

were unimagined in 1791.

In 1791, people surely imagined flying to the moon.

That doesn't grant you the right to an ICBM.

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:40 am

Why do you believe posting the same **** twice matters?

In 1791, people surely imagined flying to the moon.

That doesn't grant you the right to an ICBM.

You are diverting.

You said it was **** pertaining to what Madison did concerning repeating rifles.  Where are your sources?

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:42 am

You are diverting.

You said it was **** pertaining to what Madison did concerning repeating rifles.  Where are your sources?

No, Controlly...

Answer the question. 

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:44 am

No, Controlly...

Answer the question.

No, you are diverting.  Wait for it…

 
 

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:44 am

No, you are diverting.  Wait for it…

I'm waiting for the answer.

James Madison funded development of weapons for the battlefield so in addition civilians can afford them.  Plus, the overlying context of the thread is the debunking the myth that framers could only envision muskets so the 2A was about muskets only.

Many weapons of the 1800s were designed for the battlefield.  There was no civilian prohibition.  

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:03 am

This is one remarkably stupid human being.

So waiting for your sources that refutes my comments.

As an would 

This is not the time for you to divert with questions.  It is your time to produce, Cowardly Too Far.
 

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:47 am

So waiting for your sources that refutes my comments.

As an would 

This is not the time for you to divert with questions.  It is your time to produce, Cowardly Too Far.

Try to understand this.

It is THE PREMISE that is idiotic.


Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:46 am

I'm waiting for the answer.

I’m waiting for your sources.  That came first.
 

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:48 am

I’m waiting for your sources.  That came first.

Post the rule.

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:48 am

Try to understand this.

It is THE PREMISE that is idiotic.

Nod.

Specify the premise.  Show you understand it.

The premise was that Madison wanted repeating rifles to be affordable for the common man so he ordered the armories to figure it out.  

Even going by your premise that the 2A was for militias you can’t have a militia if the citizens can’t afford a rifle.

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:49 am

Post the rule.

Cowardly Too Far, keep running from your comments,

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:51 am

Cowardly Too Far, keep running from your comments,

No...

I'm not running from MY comments.

You are running from your own rule.

Post your Rule of Precedence.


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:52 am

No...

I'm not running from MY comments.

You are running from your own rule.

Post your Rule of Precedence.

WhY are running from your initial comments.  You can not back up your posts.  Madison did what he did for the purpose stated.  You can ask 500 diversion questions.  None will be answered until you either post sources that show I am wrong or you admit you were wrong.

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:55 am

WhY are running from your initial comments.  You can not back up your posts.  Madison did what he did for the purpose stated.  You can ask 500 diversion questions.  None will be answered until you either post sources that show I am wrong or you admit you were wrong.

Do you understand what a "premise" is?

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:58 am

Do you understand what a "premise" is?

Post the premise you claim is Bs.

Then we can get to your sources.  Now you will make post after post trying to avoid telling me what you are talking about.

Huey » 23 Aug 2022, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 6:59 am

Post the premise you claim is Bs.

Then we can get to your sources.  Now you will make post after post trying to avoid telling me what you are talking about.

No..

Answer the **** question. 
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2022, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2022, 7:03 am

No..

Answer the **** question.

Nope.  You made comments you can back up.  Now you are on the run.