Seriously? I am SO tired! you don't see me posting much? worn the f -out.Warcok » 30 Jul 2022, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do all the global warming cultists who screech rising sea levels live on the coast?
nuckinfutz » 29 Jul 2022, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ This heat is unrelenting! Our average July high temp is 86 F. Hell, it hasn't been below 90F in months now!
DAMN THAT BIDEN!![]()
![]()
![]()
https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science ... -rcna40491
Don't worry Cyndi..by the time you start getting used to it...it will be 40 degrees again....sootedupCyndi » 30 Jul 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Seriously? I am SO tired! you don't see me posting much? worn the f -out.![]()
3 nights in a row.. got up way to early. I live in Maine and it went up OVER 75>> me sweating bullets.![]()
Neo » 29 Jul 2022, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ There never was a hole. Improved technology showed there is naturally occurring thinning, the hole was never there. To continue to say it was is a lie.
Offer him a cracker - excite his interest.GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Sounds like you are a new comer to Grass Valley...?
BTW...... WHEN DO YOU PLAN ON ANSWERING THIS CHALLENGE TO YOUR INTEGRITY...?
100s of video cameras all over the Capitol Campus
140 Cops were CLAIMED to be injured badly enough to file injury reports.
POST ONE VIDEO...JUST ONE VIDEO THAT SHOWS THE SCENE YOU PRESENT HERE.
Several board members just lost a good bit of money betting against you (or would have, could they have found a taker). This is the first time that you have ever made a science claim and linked to peer reviewed science to back it up.ScottMon » 29 Jul 2022, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Pretty sure there was a hole. It's been well documented for decades.
First Direct Proof of Ozone Hole Recovery Due to Chemicals Ban | NASA
More at link: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com ... 17GL074830The Antarctic ozone hole is healing slowly because levels of the man-made chemicals causing the hole have long lifetimes. We use Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) satellite data to measure O3 over Antarctica at the beginning of winter and then compare it to O3 near the end of winter to calculate depletion. During this period, nearly all O3 change is due to depletion. MLS also measures HCl, and when ozone levels are very low, nearly all the reactive chlorine species (Cly) are converted to HCl. Cly varies a lot from year to year from atmospheric motions. Fortunately, MLS measures nitrous oxide (N2O), a long-lived gas that also varies with the motions. Using the ratio of Cly to N2O, we find that there is less chlorine now than 9 years ago and that Cly has decreased on average about 25 parts per trillion/yr (0.8%/yr). The O3 depletion we calculate from MLS data responds to changes in the Cly levels, and the ratio of the change in ozone loss to the change in Cly matches model calculations. All of this is evidence that the Montreal Protocol is working—the Cly is decreasing in the Antarctic stratosphere and the ozone destruction is decreasing along with it.
Neo » 29 Jul 2022, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ There wasn't a hole but we can certainly celebrate the fact the non existent hole closed because we reduced heavier than air cfc emissions at the cost of billions and the comfort of the same. Participation trophies invade science.
http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Ingles/Crista.html
Don't make the man kill yourself.HillaryClinton » 30 Jul 2022, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The patent on Freon was up - we needed an emergency.
Because they know global sea levels have risen approximately 2 inches since 1860. They don't believe their own rhetoric.Warcok » 30 Jul 2022, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do all the global warming cultists who screech rising sea levels live on the coast?
and none of that disproves what I posted earlier.HillaryClinton » 30 Jul 2022, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Several board members just lost a good bit of money betting against you (or would have, could they have found a taker). This is the first time that you have ever made a science claim and linked to peer reviewed science to back it up.
Well, that is technically false - you linked to a NASA puff piece. But the puff piece WAS backed by a link, and the link DID lead to a peer reviewed study, and the plain language of the abstract DID support your thesis - a once-in-your-posting-history trifecta. Well done.
As a reward, I will share a portion of the abstract, which is written by one of the scientists on the team and signed by every:
More at link: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com ... 17GL074830
Companies have a vested interest in unregulated waste materials.
Oh, it's not just that the entire world is hotter, Mensa.nuckinfutz » 29 Jul 2022, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The whole world is warmer than it used to be!But I wont mention GorebalWarming or Cannon will go nutz!
About WHAT, you unforgivably stupid ****? About cigarettes being good for your health?
That is according to bureaucracies - not scientists. You asked why would SCIENTISTS lie, and then you showed a BUREAUCRACY lying.OlderGuy » 30 Jul 2022, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ The major, and I say major concensus is that manmade climate change is not only real, it's already here.
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monito ... tal/page-1
Under Biden, or under Trump, dick sucker?OlderGuy » 30 Jul 2022, 11:54 pm » wrote: ↑ so tell me how much money do they make from this?
Compare that to the money oil companies are making today with high gas prices.