Liberal Forum

Vegas » 02 Aug 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:45 am

Back to the redundant loop again, I see. 

Here you go: 


 

It's EVIDENCE.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:44 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:33 am

I haven't made a pledge that I have lost.  You, on the other hand, have no room to discuss pledges with me.

Beach pic?  Your loss over stroky?  LMAO!

How about Pfeiffer? Or your BLS debacle?  No sir, you have no honor.  Something else your dad recognized in you.

 

Tiny,

You welshed on the original.

Prove the others....Notice how each relies, not on evidence, but its absence....

Not that you understand the distinction, of course.

Incontrovertible evidence won't be enough. Your rule.

Or your BLS debacle? 

3.5, please....

 

 

Have no clue what the "original" is.  

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am

It's EVIDENCE.

So is mine, but you refuse to read any evidence. Hence, QED. 

I will always return your pic with those pics, so why you keep reposting the same **** over and over is evidence that you are a moron. 

Thus, 
Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/
 

Vegas » 02 Aug 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:48 am

So is mine, but you refuse to read any evidence. Hence, QED. 

I will always return your pic with those pics, so why you keep reposting the same **** over and over is evidence that you are a moron. 

Thus, 
Dementia: Repetitive Speech, Looping, and Same Story Syndrome
https://www.griswoldhomecare.com/blog/2 ... same-stor/

No, it isn't...

It's just more evidence of your Stupid.

and it's redundant.

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:44 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:33 am

I haven't made a pledge that I have lost.  You, on the other hand, have no room to discuss pledges with me.

Beach pic?  Your loss over stroky?  LMAO!

How about Pfeiffer? Or your BLS debacle?  No sir, you have no honor.  Something else your dad recognized in you.


 

Tiny,

You welshed on the original.

Prove the others....Notice how each relies, not on evidence, but its absence....

Not that you understand the distinction, of course.

Incontrovertible evidence won't be enough. Your rule.

Or your BLS debacle? 

3.5, please....

 


 

Have no clue what the "original" is.  

 

Hello,  @Blackvegetable  ​​​​​​​

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am

Have no clue what the "original" is.

It's odd how you are frequently inspired to interpret, but always complain you can't understand.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:50 am

No, it isn't...

It's just more evidence of your Stupid.

and it's redundant.

Yes, it is...

My pics prove that you don't read posts before you respond. 

Redundant? Which one of reposts that same pic over and over and over and over...................

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:53 am

Hello,  @Blackvegetable  ​​​​​​​

Melt down somewhere else.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:53 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:46 am

Have no clue what the "original" is.

It's odd how you are frequently inspired to interpret, but always complain you can't understand.

 

You welshed on the original.

I show you the thread where Vegas was declared the loser, and you honor your original pledge.

Those are your words.  I have no clue what "original pledge" you are talking about.  Again, you are being cryptic.  Trying to up your enormous post count?

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:58 am

Those are your words.  I have no clue what "original pledge" you are talking about.  Again, you are being cryptic.  Trying to up your enormous post count?

Instant Recall,

What was the first pledge you posted after I arrived?

Have you honored it?



**** dotard.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 11:44 am

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 10:58 am

Those are your words.  I have no clue what "original pledge" you are talking about.  Again, you are being cryptic.  Trying to up your enormous post count?

Instant Recall,

What was the first pledge you posted after I arrived?

Have you honored it?



**** dotard.
 

 

Just post it dude.  Or not.  But every time you bring it up I will ask you to specify.  I really don't recall. 

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 11:49 am

Just post it dude.  Or not.  But every time you bring it up I will ask you to specify.  I really don't recall.

And I paraphrase 

"If that's him, I won't post for 2 weeks."
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:13 pm

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 11:49 am

Just post it dude.  Or not.  But every time you bring it up I will ask you to specify.  I really don't recall.

And I paraphrase 

"If that's him, I won't post for 2 weeks."
 

 

You never proved it was you.  When you meet the requirement I will take the week of October 2nd off.  1 week less because of your lie.

You know what you have to do.  

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:16 pm

You never proved it was you.  When you meet the requirement I will take the week of October 2nd off.  1 week less because of your lie.

You know what you have to do.

On the basis of clear and indisputable evidence. 

Beyond any reasonable doubt.

A pretty high bar.

Much higher than any of the "challenges" you remember.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:19 pm

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:16 pm

You never proved it was you.  When you meet the requirement I will take the week of October 2nd off.  1 week less because of your lie.

You know what you have to do.

On the basis of clear and indisputable evidence. 

Beyond any reasonable doubt.

A pretty high bar.

Much higher than any of the "challenges" you remember.

 

The challenge was based on a very specific condition from the get go.

You never proved it was you.  When you meet the requirement I will take the week of October 2nd off.  1 week less because of your lie.

You know what you have to do.

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm

The challenge was based on a very specific condition from the get go.

You never proved it was you.  When you meet the requirement I will take the week of October 2nd off.  1 week less because of your lie.

You know what you have to do.

Hold on.


The one you couldn't recall?

Oh I INDISPUTABLY demonstrated it was me.

Don't offer up any more deals.

You aren't good for them.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:24 pm

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm

The challenge was based on a very specific condition from the get go.

You never proved it was you.  When you meet the requirement I will take the week of October 2nd off.  1 week less because of your lie.

You know what you have to do.

Hold on.


The one you couldn't recall?

Oh I INDISPUTABLY demonstrated it was me.

Don't offer up any more deals.

You aren't good for them.
 

 

What was the first pledge you posted after I arrived?

Those are your words.  That implies soon after you arrived.  You made that thread at least a year and half later.  Our first challenge was the BLS challenge were you claimed I never heard of them or posted about them until you arrived.  You lost that one as well.  

You did not meet the conditions of the challenge.

THAT is why when asked you should just do it. 

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm

Those are your words.  That implies soon after you arrived.  You made that thread at least a year and half later.  Our first challenge was the BLS challenge were you claimed I never heard of them or posted about them until you arrived.  You lost that one as well.  

You did not meet the conditions of the challenge.

THAT is why when asked you should just do it.

WTF is all this about?

You welshed.

Our first challenge was the BLS challenge were you claimed I never heard of them or posted about them until you arrived.  You lost that one as well.  

And you recently demonstrated that your understanding of BLS is very vague indeed, 3.5U6

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2022, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 1:13 pm

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm

Those are your words.  That implies soon after you arrived.  You made that thread at least a year and half later.  Our first challenge was the BLS challenge were you claimed I never heard of them or posted about them until you arrived.  You lost that one as well.  

You did not meet the conditions of the challenge.

THAT is why when asked you should just do it.

WTF is all this about?

You welshed.

Our first challenge was the BLS challenge were you claimed I never heard of them or posted about them until you arrived.  You lost that one as well.  

And you recently demonstrated that your understanding of BLS is very vague indeed, 3.5U6

 

WTF is all this about?

You welshed.

No, you did not meet the conditions.  If you do within the next 24 hours I will take that week off. 

And you recently demonstrated that your understanding of BLS is very vague indeed

But that was not what our FIRST, original challenge was about.

3.5U6

This is why people refuse to admit they made a mistake or misread something. ****, if you did you would be answering for your errors all day long. 

Huey » 02 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm

No, you did not meet the conditions.  If you do within the next 24 hours I will take that week off. 

But that was not what our FIRST, original challenge was about.

This is why people refuse to admit they made a mistake or misread something. ****, if you did you would be answering for your errors all day long.

No, Tiny...I shot you the evidence that day, cause I was still wearing the same things as in the photo.


Zerointegrity