Liberal Forum

Skans » 01 Aug 2022, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:21 am

Do you have a man-crush on Kyle?

No more than you do so for Biden, or Obama.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:28 am

No more than you do so for Biden, or Obama.

I think you do.  I think you like little boys.
 

Skans » 01 Aug 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:29 am

I think you do.  I think you like little boys.

You have no reason to.

But you do carry an inexplicable torch for a "man baby"...
 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:10 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 9:59 am

Bo matter what I post you will claim it is wrong.  So cut to the chase to save time.  Go on record.

Don't give me that weak ****, Tiny.


How frail is your case?
 


 

Don't give me that weak ****, DEMA.

You post a call out thread title with a link that now shows up whenever I go to a site as an advertisement.  Thanks.  

Here is what it is really about.

It is a diversion from the mega curbstomping you received on this thread:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=69423

Now tell me I am wrong and why.  In narrative or bullet point format.  

 

 

 

Skans » 01 Aug 2022, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:21 am

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm

https://www.tacticalxabs.com/

Do you have a man-crush on Kyle?
 

 

 

Skans » 01 Aug 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:29 am

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:28 am

No more than you do so for Biden, or Obama.

I think you do.  I think you like little boys.
 

 

Clearly skans understands that his ox isn't merely being gored, it's pulling a train.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:27 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am

Don't give me that weak ****, DEMA.

You post a call out thread title with a link that now shows up whenever I go to a site as an advertisement.  Thanks.  

Here is what it is really about.

It is a diversion from the mega curbstomping you received on this thread:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=69423

Now tell me I am wrong and why.  In narrative or bullet point format.

You should have said

"You're right, Master V., I have no case... again."

This is about marketing to the kinds of incel losers who buy ARs.

Notice a lot of talk about SEALS, and "TACTICAL X!!!!!"..hell, even the engineers who built it have killed people with their bare teeth....**** like that is a gold mine...at least to those coming up with clever ways to expand the market for TACTICAL Freedom guaranteeing things.

Now the feds might not giggle when this Spartan cries
"Molon labe!"....not if he's sportin' a set of TACTICAL X 6 PACK ABS!!!!!



 

 

You should have led with that.

There are estimates of 20-30 million semi automatic sports rifles in the country.  All would be grandfathered on the DOA bill passed in the house.  Some may fit your description but most do not. Now before you tell me to back that up YOU first, DEMA!

Epic fail!

PS.  You solidify the point that your desire to ban them is based on appearance and the stereotype of those who own them.  You are not that bright.

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:37 am

You should have led with that.

There are estimates of 20-30 million semi automatic sports rifles in the country.  All would be grandfathered on the DOA bill passed in the house.  Some may fit your description but most do not. Now before you tell me to back that up YOU first, DEMA!

Epic fail!

PS.  You solidify the point that your desire to ban them is based on appearance and the stereotype of those who own them. You are not that bright.

I know, right?
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:37 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:10 am

Don't give me that weak ****, Tiny.


How frail is your case?
 



 

Don't give me that weak ****, DEMA.

You post a call out thread title with a link that now shows up whenever I go to a site as an advertisement.  Thanks.  

Here is what it is really about.

It is a diversion from the mega curbstomping you received on this thread:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=69423

Now tell me I am wrong and why.  In narrative or bullet point format.  

 


 

Skans » 01 Aug 2022, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:21 am

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm

https://www.tacticalxabs.com/

Do you have a man-crush on Kyle?
 


 

Skans » 01 Aug 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:29 am

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:28 am

No more than you do so for Biden, or Obama.

I think you do.  I think you like little boys.
 


 

Clearly skans understands that his ox isn't merely being gored, it's pulling a train.

 

Nah, he is sitting back laughing at your latest bit of dumbassery.  

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:39 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:37 am

You should have led with that.

There are estimates of 20-30 million semi automatic sports rifles in the country.  All would be grandfathered on the DOA bill passed in the house.  Some may fit your description but most do not. Now before you tell me to back that up YOU first, DEMA!

Epic fail!

PS.  You solidify the point that your desire to ban them is based on appearance and the stereotype of those who own them. You are not that bright.

I know, right?
 

 

A sphincter say what?

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:56 am

Nah, he is sitting back laughing at your latest bit of dumbassery.

But you needed it illuminated for you.


So who's the "*******", *******?
 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:59 am

A sphincter say what?

You'll want to cauterize that, STAT.

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:59 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:56 am

Nah, he is sitting back laughing at your latest bit of dumbassery.

But you needed it illuminated for you.


So who's the "*******", *******?
 

 

Like everyone else.  

And I was right.  You were running from your curbstomping.  Someday you will realize you are not as witty as you think your are.  Next, you should have led with that long, drawn out BS.

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:00 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:59 am

A sphincter say what?

You'll want to cauterize that, STAT.

 

 

Stop shooting yourself in the head and you won't have to worry about it.

But, since day one, I have nailed the very reason you want that style of weapon banned.  

@Blackvegetable  



A helluva lot more people are shot by people like that, to include MORE mass shootings than those you fear buying AR 15s.  Yet you are strangely silent on the issue.  You must be a racist.  
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 9:44 am

No, he's like you.

An incel, whose only contact with women is when he punches them from behind.

*sniff*....Smell that dickhead desperation!!...your'e really gonna stink by election day        

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm

https://www.tacticalxabs.com/
 
 
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:27 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 10:15 am

Don't give me that weak ****, DEMA.

You post a call out thread title with a link that now shows up whenever I go to a site as an advertisement.  Thanks.  

Here is what it is really about.

It is a diversion from the mega curbstomping you received on this thread:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=69423

Now tell me I am wrong and why.  In narrative or bullet point format.

You should have said

"You're right, Master V., I have no case... again."

This is about marketing to the kinds of incel losers who buy ARs.

Notice a lot of talk about SEALS, and "TACTICAL X!!!!!"..hell, even the engineers who built it have killed people with their bare teeth....**** like that is a gold mine...at least to those coming up with clever ways to expand the market for TACTICAL Freedom guaranteeing things.

Now the feds might not giggle when this Spartan cries
"Molon labe!"....not if he's sportin' a set of TACTICAL X 6 PACK ABS!!!!!



 

 

BV thinks we should gleaned all of that from one his thread title and lack of an OP.  

@Blackvegetable  

This is for you from 2016:

I'm one of those 5 million. I've owned an AR-15 for four years, and I use it for varmint control on my 17-acre Texas estate. Are people like me bloodthirsty savages? Delusional survivalists? Military fetishists? Insecure men with tiny … hands?

If you're prepared to answer "yes" to all of the above and consider the case closed, then please move on and don't read anymore. This article isn't my attempt to justify anything to you — it's not a defense of what's in my gun safe or of the AR-15 itself. If, for you, my AR-15 ownership is prima facie evidence of my mental instability, sexual inadequacy, lack of a conscience, or what-have-you, then I honestly don't care what you think about this issue. You can go back to broadcasting your own moral superiority on social media, and I can go back to tuning you out until your rage therapy session is over.

(Sounds jut like you and the talking points you parrot.)

No, this article is for the genuinely curious — those who assume that 5 million of their fellow Americans are not inhuman or insane, and who want to understand what set of rationales, no matter how flawed and confused they may ultimately turn out to be, could make an otherwise normal person walk out of a gun store with an "assault weapon."

https://www.vox.com/2016/6/20/11975850/ ... er-orlando

You should read it.  

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:15 am

@Blackvegetable  

This is for you from 2016:

I'm one of those 5 million. I've owned an AR-15 for four years, and I use it for varmint control on my 17-acre Texas estate. Are people like me bloodthirsty savages? Delusional survivalists? Military fetishists? Insecure men with tiny … hands?

If you're prepared to answer "yes" to all of the above and consider the case closed, then please move on and don't read anymore. This article isn't my attempt to justify anything to you — it's not a defense of what's in my gun safe or of the AR-15 itself. If, for you, my AR-15 ownership is prima facie evidence of my mental instability, sexual inadequacy, lack of a conscience, or what-have-you, then I honestly don't care what you think about this issue. You can go back to broadcasting your own moral superiority on social media, and I can go back to tuning you out until your rage therapy session is over.

(Sounds jut like you and the talking points you parrot.)

No, this article is for the genuinely curious — those who assume that 5 million of their fellow Americans are not inhuman or insane, and who want to understand what set of rationales, no matter how flawed and confused they may ultimately turn out to be, could make an otherwise normal person walk out of a gun store with an "assault weapon."

https://www.vox.com/2016/6/20/11975850/ ... er-orlando

You should read it.

Why should I bother?
 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:10 am

BV thinks we should gleaned all of that from one his thread title and lack of an OP.

Not the Clinically Stupid, obviously. 

But you should explain how you could pronounce it a failure in spite of never understanding it
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:21 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:15 am

@Blackvegetable  

This is for you from 2016:

I'm one of those 5 million. I've owned an AR-15 for four years, and I use it for varmint control on my 17-acre Texas estate. Are people like me bloodthirsty savages? Delusional survivalists? Military fetishists? Insecure men with tiny … hands?

If you're prepared to answer "yes" to all of the above and consider the case closed, then please move on and don't read anymore. This article isn't my attempt to justify anything to you — it's not a defense of what's in my gun safe or of the AR-15 itself. If, for you, my AR-15 ownership is prima facie evidence of my mental instability, sexual inadequacy, lack of a conscience, or what-have-you, then I honestly don't care what you think about this issue. You can go back to broadcasting your own moral superiority on social media, and I can go back to tuning you out until your rage therapy session is over.

(Sounds jut like you and the talking points you parrot.)

No, this article is for the genuinely curious — those who assume that 5 million of their fellow Americans are not inhuman or insane, and who want to understand what set of rationales, no matter how flawed and confused they may ultimately turn out to be, could make an otherwise normal person walk out of a gun store with an "assault weapon."

https://www.vox.com/2016/6/20/11975850/ ... er-orlando

You should read it.

Why should I bother?
 

 

Because it picks apart most of your force fed talking points.  You might learn something.  The writer does not fit your stereotype and appears to be on the left. 

Or don't and remain ignorant. 

Consider your arguments successfully debunked. 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:26 am

Because it picks apart most of your force fed talking points.  You might learn something.  The writer does not fit your stereotype and appears to be on the left. 

Or don't and remain ignorant. 

Consider your arguments successfully debunked.

But mine AREN'T "Talking Points".

They are confirmed facts.