Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm

https://www.tacticalxabs.com/

I gave Kyle yer address...123 Skidrow.   :)

roadkill » 01 Aug 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:30 am

I gave Kyle yer address...123 Skidrow.   

Did you leave it in a note on his pillow?

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:31 am

Did you leave it in a note on his pillow?

No need...all patriots know where Skidrow Commies live.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:28 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:26 am

Because it picks apart most of your force fed talking points.  You might learn something.  The writer does not fit your stereotype and appears to be on the left. 

Or don't and remain ignorant. 

Consider your arguments successfully debunked.

But mine AREN'T "Talking Points".

They are confirmed facts.
 

 

Yes, they are talking points.

No, they are not confirmed facts. 

Read the article. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:25 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:10 am

BV thinks we should gleaned all of that from one his thread title and lack of an OP.

Not the Clinically Stupid, obviously. 

But you should explain how you could pronounce it a failure in spite of never understanding it
 

 

Because you were trying a call out thread that did not piss anyone off.  YOU are the only one who got pissed off.  I knew right away you were diverting from the *** kicking you received on your SIG thread. . 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:36 am

Because you were trying a call out thread that did not piss anyone off.  YOU are the only one who got pissed off.  I knew right away you were diverting from the *** kicking you received on your SIG thread. .

Tiny,

That you don't understand that you've been dissed is irrelevant. 

you were diverting from the *** kicking you received on your SIG thread. .

why do you keep doing this?

You know what happens when I ask for your case..

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:41 am

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:36 am

Because you were trying a call out thread that did not piss anyone off.  YOU are the only one who got pissed off.  I knew right away you were diverting from the *** kicking you received on your SIG thread. .

Tiny,

That you don't understand that you've been dissed is irrelevant. 

you were diverting from the *** kicking you received on your SIG thread. .

why do you keep doing this?

You know what happens when I ask for your case..

 

Say what?
 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:45 am

Say what?

Read it again.

Specify what confounds you, neverrun.

Then stop running.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:54 am

Read it again.

Specify what confounds you, neverrun.

Then stop running.

…

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:58 am

…

Another typical Sheilagh case.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:09 pm

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 11:58 am

…

Another typical Sheilagh case.

 

Not my thread. No need to make one. 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:25 pm

Not my thread. No need to make one.

There is if you're assertin'.



 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2022, 6:28 pm

https://www.tacticalxabs.com/

You OK, geezer? Your OP's are making less and less sense, you off your Alzheimer's meds?

**chuckle**
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:44 pm

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:25 pm

Not my thread. No need to make one.

There is if you're assertin'.



 

 

1.  It is quite clear this thread is in response to your *** whoopin.

2.  I have backed up my comments concerning your alleged reason for the thread, (which you did not put in the OP) with an article.

3.  Your move.
 

Cedar » 01 Aug 2022, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:50 pm

You OK, geezer? Your OP's are making less and less sense, you off your Alzheimer's meds?

**chuckle**

Consider the prohibitive likelihood that you're just kinda dim.

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:52 pm

1.  It is quite clear this thread is in response to your *** whoopin.

2.  I have backed up my comments concerning your alleged reason for the thread, (which you did not put in the OP) with an article.

3.  Your move.

1. A case you can't make, on either score.

2. Twatty,

It is not my fault that you're stupid.


Sum up your citation in 3 concise bullet points and I'll decide if it's worth reading 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:55 pm

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:52 pm

1.  It is quite clear this thread is in response to your *** whoopin.

2.  I have backed up my comments concerning your alleged reason for the thread, (which you did not put in the OP) with an article.

3.  Your move.

1. A case you can't make, on either score.

2. Twatty,

It is not my fault that you're stupid.


Sum up your citation in 3 concise bullet points and I'll decide if it's worth reading
 

 

Too much fluff and a demand.  
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 12:52 pm

Consider the prohibitive likelihood that you're just kinda dim.

Consider in trying to be cute with your titles the reader has no **** idea what the **** your talking about. You communicate your ideas poorly.
 

Huey » 01 Aug 2022, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 1:06 pm

Too much fluff and a demand.

"Rule for thee, what rule"?

Cedar » 01 Aug 2022, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2022, 1:08 pm

Consider in trying to be cute with your titles the reader has no **** idea what the **** your talking about. You communicate your ideas poorly.

If you don’t get it, how the **** do you know it's "cute"?