But not for the DEAD child.Xavier_Onassis » 03 Aug 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ It is a BIG win for some poor women in the future that do not wish to have a child they do not want.
It is also an indication that even in conservative states, not all of the Trumpest policies are overwhelmingly popular.
Why can't you accept that a woman's decisions be taken from her by the Kansas Legislature?
Should they also be allowed to prevent you from buying Viagra or condoms?
Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ I'm just surprised it was so resounding especially in a state like Kansas. Perhaps I'm cheering for my team but I think that is a good sign for Democrats in November.
IDENTITY POLITICS RIGHT OUT OF THE DNC PLAYBOOK.FOS » 03 Aug 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ what should make you hopeful about november is that the GOP apparently cannot figure out how to offer decent candidates.
in georgia they are literally offering hershel walker. trust me...GOP voters in georgia are not going to be inspired by a retarded football *** with 5 illegitimite children and multiple personality disorder.
but ready for the bad news? the democrats are going to serve jews just as much as the gop does. the parties are no different.
GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Aug 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ IDENTITY POLITICS RIGHT OUT OF THE DNC PLAYBOOK.
Hershel Walker is such a flawed candidate that the people responsible for promoting him should surrender their GOP CARDS..
Might as well promote DOG THE BOUNTY HUNTER or HULK HOGAN....
Didn't JESSE 'THE BODY" VENTURA end up being a productive Governor...?
GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Aug 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Didn't JESSE 'THE BODY" VENTURA end up being a productive Governor...?
I think property tax reform was his claim to fame.FOS » 03 Aug 2022, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ i know he was govenor of one of those midwestern states...but i seriously doubt he did anything.
after all he was libertarian...and doing stuff is opposed to libertarian ideology
Retards starting threads on subjects they don't even understand.Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ If you were tracking the primaries last night you might be getting a feel of how the Dodd decision is playing out. Kansas, a state that is considered very Conservative, rejected a constitutional amendment to ban abortion with 59% of the vote. Perhaps a miscalculation by Trump when he chose his Supreme Court justices? Does anyone here think that this might also play into Democratic hands when the actual midterms take place? That seems like a pretty resounding defeat.
Cedar » 03 Aug 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Retards starting threads on subjects they don't even understand.
**chuckle**
The amendment had zero to do with banning abortion.Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I think I understand politics. On both sides of the aisle.
Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I think I understand politics. On both sides of the aisle.
And you are a retched piece of ****. Anyone who believes it should be lawful to kill a viable infant seconds before it is born (you) is mentally deranged. Would you like me to find it, or would you care to re-state your position? Or do we need to meet?Blackvegetable » 03 Aug 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ You're right.
That's dumb.
But it's not like you are blessed with options.
No, Its this one.FOS » 03 Aug 2022, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ wait a second...is THIS that Dodd amendment you are speaking of? https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-con ... xt?r=2&s=1
ScottMon » 03 Aug 2022, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Its this one.
HB 2746 | Bills and Resolutions | Kansas State Legislature (kslegislature.org)
I suggest you read the text of the ballot measure, I think ohm wrote it.Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I must admit I didn't read the details of the amendment itself. The spirit of the rejection is still open that Kansas supports abortion rights at least with those who voted Tuesday. Not complete, but I wouldn't say non existent either.