Liberal Forum

Cedar » 03 Aug 2022, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 1:41 pm

I suggest you read the text of the ballot measure, I think ohm wrote it.

I did. The text of the Kansas state constitution states that all women have a legal right to an abortion. Like the American constitution, all 50 states have their own founding document. The amendment would have allowed the Kansas legislature to pass laws restricting abortion in direct violation of the constitution of that state. That's why it is an amendment. Constitutions can be rewritten in the form of additions to the language of the document. Perhaps not a law banning abortion, just enabling laws that would do so without being stricken down by the Kansas Supreme Court in violation of the Kansas state constitution. .

Sounds like the SCOTUS decision is working as intended.

So what's been the problem?

DeplorablePatriot » 03 Aug 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 1:27 pm

And you are a retched piece of ****. Anyone who believes it should be lawful to kill a viable infant seconds before it is born (you) is mentally deranged. Would you like me to find it, or would you care to re-state your position?  Or do we need to meet?

I believe there are many who should be retroactively aborted.

Cedar » 03 Aug 2022, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 1:41 pm

I suggest you read the text of the ballot measure, I think ohm wrote it.

That’s funny as ****

Blackvegetable » 03 Aug 2022, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 10:53 am

Please don't.

??? so, you are suggesting the people of Kansas have spoken for the people of Texas??? 

The only thing that happened or actually failed to happen is the people of the State of Kansas vote not to change their State Constitution

... that's it!!!

any procedures, rules, conditions of abortion still exist ... 

 

Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 9:27 am

If you were tracking the primaries last night you might be getting a feel of how the Dodd decision is playing out. Kansas, a state that is considered very Conservative, rejected a constitutional amendment to ban abortion with 59% of the vote. Perhaps a miscalculation by Trump when he chose his Supreme Court justices? Does anyone here think that this might also play into Democratic hands when the actual midterms take place? That seems like a pretty resounding defeat.

The best thing about abortion is it's taking out worthless people.

And the best measure of that, of course, is "Mommy".
If she doesn't care about what's between her legs, why should anybody else?

Independent » 03 Aug 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 10:41 am

According to the Supreme Court. Try to catch up.

the Supreme Court has been taken over by theocrats. 

Pastafarian » 03 Aug 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 3:34 pm

the Supreme Court has been taken over by theocrats.

Oh my. Did this happen tonight? I didn’t see anything about it in the news!!
 

Independent » 03 Aug 2022, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 8:40 pm

Oh my. Did this happen tonight? I didn’t see anything about it in the news!!

Too many papists with divided loyalties.

We should deport them all.
 

Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 9:27 am

If you were tracking the primaries last night you might be getting a feel of how the Dodd decision is playing out. Kansas, a state that is considered very Conservative, rejected a constitutional amendment to ban abortion with 59% of the vote. Perhaps a miscalculation by Trump when he chose his Supreme Court justices? Does anyone here think that this might also play into Democratic hands when the actual midterms take place? That seems like a pretty resounding defeat.
 

What was the participation rate of registered voters voted makeup that 59%? 55% so that big 59% is misleading as hell. because in real numbers of the whole it is less than 25% of residents in Kansas.

What was participation rate in rural areas vs urban turnout at the ballot box between voted in urban areas vs rural. What was mail in ballot count?

I watched how elections are rigged, so let's get to the core of all the corruption going on everywhere.

Monderegal » 03 Aug 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 9:27 am

If you were tracking the primaries last night you might be getting a feel of how the Dodd decision is playing out. Kansas, a state that is considered very Conservative, rejected a constitutional amendment to ban abortion with 59% of the vote. Perhaps a miscalculation by Trump when he chose his Supreme Court justices? Does anyone here think that this might also play into Democratic hands when the actual midterms take place? That seems like a pretty resounding defeat.

 The good news is that if you disagree with various Kansas laws you can leave the state a lot easier than you could sign out of the USA contract.

Death cult problems, this here climate is bad and so now you have to die. Same old stuff in the same old world.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8NkQTozdJYdx/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aG8WqEyXIyc

Independent » 03 Aug 2022, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 9:49 am

What don’t you understand?

I will try to dumb it down for you. 

Enshrining abortion policy in a constitution one way or another is wrong.

Going thru the posts here it is easy to see that dumbing it down won't help.....they have the political intellect of a primitive Amazon tribe watching a solar eclipse for the first time...a political witch doctor is narrating it for them in the absence of their own ability to understand what's going on

Abortion is the modern day equivalent sacrificing virgins to appease the Media Celebrity Gods

nefarious101 » 04 Aug 2022, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2022, 7:05 am

Going thru the posts here it is easy to see that dumbing it down won't help.....they have the political intellect of a primitive Amazon tribe watching a solar eclipse for the first time...a political witch doctor is narrating it for them in the absence of their own ability to understand what's going on

Abortion is the modern day equivalent sacrificing virgins to appease the Media Celebrity Gods

Time people started paying attention to the Advertising Council marketing reality's pay to stay in character cradle to grave is larger than real life changing population between inception and extinction events total sum results working here now recorded in personal DNA.

The People of Kansas didn't change anything. You may get an abortion in Kansas until 20 weeks after fertilization...

They voted not to change anything.

Independent » 03 Aug 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 12:31 pm

But not for the DEAD child.

3rd term abortions are rare and necessary.  The mothers wanted to give birth but something went wrong with the pregnancy.  
 

NEILCAR » 04 Aug 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2022, 7:23 am

The People of Kansas didn't change anything. You may get an abortion in Kansas until 20 weeks after fertilization...

They voted not to change anything.

They rejected a change that would have blocked their rights to a legal abortion. 
 

ScottMon » 04 Aug 2022, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2022, 7:33 am

They rejected a change that would have blocked their rights to a legal abortion. 
 

After 20 weeks of being pregnant. That is roughly 4 and a half months. That is half term pregnancy. You are really a Nimbod building a tower of doubt into heaven after dead while living is eternally separated as ancestrally occupying space in plain sight.

History immortalizes ideas, eternal life is sustained in reproductive order of numbers occupying space here now. How much simpler can life be, unless idealistic doubters govern your tomorrows, today with incomplete facts that only prove loyalty to a royal we and prosecute anyone defying reality of any franchise established globally within this species?

Independent » 03 Aug 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 10:41 am

According to the Supreme Court. Try to catch up.

The Supreme Court has been packed with Catholics deliberately. The choose to believe that a woman does not even own her own body.
How stupid is that?

Independent » 03 Aug 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2022, 10:41 am

According to the Supreme Court. Try to catch up.

The Supreme Court has been packed with Catholics deliberately. The choose to believe that a woman does not even own her own body.
How stupid is that?
 

Xavier_Onassis » 04 Aug 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2022, 8:22 am

The Supreme Court has been packed with Catholics deliberately. They choose to believe that a woman does not even own her own body, and then force the entire country to believe that old men in 50 states somehow OWN the body of every pregnant woman.
.
How stupid is that?

When you call yourself "INDEPENDENT", I call **** on you.

If people are independent, they own their own bodies.
Not some elderly men who were elected because of their policies on farm subsidies or the state dessert.