Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm

How many have you had answered, Tiny?

Was this your response, TtPS?

@Vegas  

​​​​​​​Wow, on e question.  Plus, you had a question to answer.  The way this works with YOU is you get to ask a question, I answer and I get to ask one.

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 1:58 pm

No moron.  You told independent the other day he needed to rake the sand traps at Wyndham the other day.  And I quoted it.  **** Idiot.

You have a question to answer:

Do you understand since the Siena Poll came in 2019 and this new poll you have been lying about Trumps ranking in reference to Buchanan?

,

Where did "short" and "public" come from, ShamusM4Self-inflictedHeadwound

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:00 pm

Wow, on e question.  Plus, you had a question to answer.  The way this works with YOU is you get to ask a question, I answer and I get to ask one.

TinyImbecile,

You stipulated that you've answered fewer than I.

In your own words..

​​​​​​​
 

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 1:58 pm

No moron.  You told independent the other day he needed to rake the sand traps at Wyndham the other day.  And I quoted it.  **** Idiot.

You have a question to answer:

Do you understand since the Siena Poll came in 2019 and this new poll you have been lying about Trumps ranking in reference to Buchanan?

,

Do you understand since the Siena Poll came in 2019 and this new poll you have been lying about Trumps ranking in reference to Buchanan?

No, I have not.

Until APSA revises its prior judgment "Worse than Buchanan" it remains.

Acknowledge that you have been answered AGAIN.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm

No, I have not.

Until APSA revises its prior judgment "Worse than Buchanan" it remains.

Acknowledge that you have been answered AGAIN.

Post the rule/stipulations on being an incessant coward. 

Now. 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:03 pm

TinyImbecile,

You stipulated that you've answered fewer than I.

In your own words..

 

You’ll have to post it with a link.  

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm

You’ll have to post it with a link.

Already did, stupid ****...

You even responded to it, stupid ****.
 
No **** link necessary

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm

No, I have not.

Until APSA revises its prior judgment "Worse than Buchanan" it remains.

Acknowledge that you have been answered AGAIN.

Only if qualify it with APSA survey.

you have posted 3 surveys.  From 2 different sources.  Your Siena surveys Trump the APSA survey because they are more recent.  

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:09 pm

Already did, stupid ****...

You even responded to it, stupid ****.
 
No **** link necessary

Show me…..      

Sound familiar? 

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 1:56 pm

Pound Sand.  You don’t honor challenges when you lose.

Do you understand since the Siena Poll before the this new poll you have been lying about Trumps ranking in reference to Buchanan?

 

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm

Show me…..      

Sound familiar?

When I do, you take 2 weeks off, OK?

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 12:08 pm

I am not going back to count.  More than you.

BUT, you have a question to answer then you get another another question.

Do you understand since the Siena Poll before the this new poll you have been lying about Trumps ranking in reference to Buchanan?

Yes/No/I dunno

Right there I said I answered more than you.

@Blackvegetable  

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:12 pm

When I do, you take 2 weeks off, OK?

Nope.  No challenges with you.  Until you admit you lost the challenges posted no challenges for you.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:11 pm

****, more underwear pics.  What a sicko.  I am not gay.  

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:10 pm

Only if qualify it with APSA survey.

you have posted 3 surveys.  From 2 different sources.  Your Siena surveys Trump the APSA survey because they are more recent.

No....Not unless you can show me a rule...


No...Did Grifty GAIN or LOSE in the most recent Siena Rankings?

If the latter, there is no reason to believe that he will gain in the survey which so presciently judged him in 2017....

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:15 pm

No....Not unless you can show me a rule...

No...Did Grifty GAIN or LOSE in the most recent Siena Rankings?

If the latter, there is no reason to believe that he will gain in the survey which so presciently judged him in 2017....

Nod.

He lost a spot.  But that wasn’t the issue.  

Where is Buchanan?

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:14 pm

****, more underwear pics.  What a sicko.  I am not gay.

**** it doesn't.....

"Underwear model", "gigolo", "demigod!"

We heard it all, little quimmie...

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:16 pm

**** it doesn't.....

"Underwear model", "gigolo", "demigod!"

We heard it all, little quimmie...

Yes, but I wasn’t calling you that.  And not sure why it is relevant.  I never had a challenge or a pledge with you concerning that.

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:16 pm

He lost a spot.  But that wasn’t the issue.  

Where is Buchanan?

It very much is....

If he lost a spot with Siena, why do you believe he would gain one in APSA?

Oh, yea......because you're a moron.

Huey » 07 Aug 2022, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2022, 2:17 pm

Yes, but I wasn’t calling you that.  And not sure why it is relevant.  I never had a challenge or a pledge with you concerning that.

Yes, you were...

as the objective and unimpeachable evidence shows.