Liberal Forum

HERE IS YOUR POST
viewtopic.php?p=1783343#p1783343

WHY DO YOU SUPPORT BIDEN WHEN YOU KNOW HE HAS BEEN BREEDING VACCINE SKEPTICISM?  

TB7 » 08 Aug 2022, 5:34 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 5:34 am

Bv still believes the Russian collusion hoax.


It's no wonder Santa stopped bringing him presents many years ago.       

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2022, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 5:36 am

Don't go on and on about it.

When you whined about it I made other plans.

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 7:10 am

When you whined about it I made other plans.

You whined about it as recently as yesterday.

So, to sum up.

Biden

19 Overall

30 Communication



Grifty


43 Overall

43 Communication 





Is that correct?
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2022, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 7:36 am

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 7:10 am

When you whined about it I made other plans.

You whined about it as recently as yesterday.

So, to sum up.

Biden

19 Overall

30 Communication

Grifty

43 Overall

43 Communication 

Is that correct?

That had been answered but yes, it is correct.  Acknowledge you were answered.   

Now our discussion centered on Trump/Buchanan.

To sum up the issue

You have posted and relied on TWO surveys of Presidential Historians from Siena from 2019 and last week.  I have posted from the C-Span Presidential survey of 2021.  In those 3 polls was Trump ranked higher or lower than Buchanan?
 

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 7:41 am

That had been answered but yes, it is correct.  Acknowledge you were answered.   

Now our discussion centered on Trump/Buchanan.

To sum up the issue

You have posted and relied on TWO surveys of Presidential Historians from Siena from 2019 and last week.  I have posted from the C-Span Presidential survey of 2021.  In those 3 polls was Trump ranked higher or lower than Buchanan?

No, you cowardly little tool...you did nothing of the sort.

In those 3 polls was Trump ranked higher or lower than Buchanan?

For the 37th time.

It's irrelevant...

Until APSA updates its rankings Grifty remains, in their informed and uniquely qualified judgment, Worse than Buchanan.

Acknowledge that you have been told this AGAIN.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2022, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:06 am

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 7:41 am

That had been answered but yes, it is correct.  Acknowledge you were answered.   

Now our discussion centered on Trump/Buchanan.

To sum up the issue

You have posted and relied on TWO surveys of Presidential Historians from Siena from 2019 and last week.  I have posted from the C-Span Presidential survey of 2021.  In those 3 polls was Trump ranked higher or lower than Buchanan?

No, you cowardly little tool...you did nothing of the sort.

In those 3 polls was Trump ranked higher or lower than Buchanan?

For the 37th time.

It's irrelevant...

Until APSA updates its rankings Grifty remains, in their informed and uniquely qualified judgment, Worse than Buchanan.

Acknowledge that you have been told this AGAIN.
 
 

 

Cool.  No problem.  You have to stop relying on the Siena Survey because you clearly do not trust the results.  Meaning your whole diversion about communications is moot because the survey results can not be trusted because, in your own words, they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

Acknowledge you have discredited your own survey.   You lose. Damn, it took a couple of day but I got him to discredit his own survey.  

He still hasn't answered the OP question.

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:13 am

Cool.  No problem.  You have to stop relying on the Siena Survey because you clearly do not trust the results.  Meaning your whole diversion about communications is moot because the survey results can not be trusted because, in your own words, they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

Acknowledge you have discredited your own survey.   You lose. Damn, it took a couple of day but I got him to discredit his own survey.

You have to stop

No, Adolph....I don't. 

because you clearly

Tiny,

You are far too stupid to presume to think for me.

Meaning your whole diversion about communications is moot

No, Mindlessly Yapping Little Twat.

The surveys don't have to yield the same results to be valid.

They are DIFFERENT SURVEYS, with different responding populations..

There is no meaningful difference between 43 and 45.....they both tell you the same thing.

Orange Man sucks, Toady.

in your own words, they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

But they all agree that Grifty SUCKS, Toady.

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2022, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:35 am

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:13 am

Cool.  No problem.  You have to stop relying on the Siena Survey because you clearly do not trust the results.  Meaning your whole diversion about communications is moot because the survey results can not be trusted because, in your own words, they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

Acknowledge you have discredited your own survey.   You lose. Damn, it took a couple of day but I got him to discredit his own survey.

You have to stop

No, Adolph....I don't. 

because you clearly

Tiny,

You are far too stupid to presume to think for me.

Meaning your whole diversion about communications is moot

No, Mindlessly Yapping Little Twat.

The surveys don't have to yield the same results to be valid.

They are DIFFERENT SURVEYS, with different responding populations..

There is no meaningful difference between 43 and 45.....they both tell you the same thing.

Orange Man sucks, Toady.

in your own words, they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

But they all agree that Grifty SUCKS, Toady.

 

 

Sorry, you don't accept the overall results of the Siena Poll because they do not show Trump below Buchanan.  They are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.  With that said your entire diversion about communication is null an void because they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

Game. Set. Match.

TB7 » 08 Aug 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:22 am

He still hasn't answered the OP question.


 

He did.  But it was weak.  To sum up his response it was basically because it wasn't Trump.  He would have voted for anybody but Trump.  

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:44 am

Sorry, you don't accept the overall results of the Siena Poll because they do not show Trump below Buchanan.  They are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.  With that said your entire diversion about communication is null an void because they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

Game. Set. Match.

Sorry, you don't accept the overall results of the Siena Poll because they do not show Trump below Buchanan

No...haven't said anything like it.

They are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment

The fact that I said APSA is informed, doesn't mean they're not.

However, there is only one population as select as APSA....and that's APSA, hence unique. 

With that said your entire diversion about communication is null an void because they are not  informed and uniquely qualified to make that judgment.

Not because you say so, but you can stop saying so now.

Game. Set. Match.

If you beat yourself, did you also lose?

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:45 am

He did.  But it was weak.  To sum up his response it was basically because it wasn't Trump.  He would have voted for anybody but Trump.

you mean this  

viewtopic.php?p=2097315#p2097315

TB7 » 08 Aug 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 9:23 am

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 8:45 am

He did.  But it was weak.  To sum up his response it was basically because it wasn't Trump.  He would have voted for anybody but Trump.

you mean this  

viewtopic.php?p=2097315#p2097315

 

This one.

It was actually not a vote for Biden as much as a recognition that the worst POTUS ever, the drug addled man baby, he described by his appointees as "a **** moron" and "dumb as ****", had run out of all potential candidates of a future administration not closely associated with the WWE.

viewtopic.php?p=2097571#p2097571

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 9:54 am

This one.

It was actually not a vote for Biden as much as a recognition that the worst POTUS ever, the drug addled man baby, he described by his appointees as "a **** moron" and "dumb as ****", had run out of all potential candidates of a future administration not closely associated with the WWE.

viewtopic.php?p=2097571#p2097571

THE WORST CASE OF TDS...NEXT TO B.SEE...I HAVE EVER SEEN
wow....his exact quote.....
viewtopic.php?p=2097571#p2097571

I noticed that those that were blaming Biden for high gas prices and shuddering economy are being really quiet right now.

ScottMon » 08 Aug 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 10:17 am

I noticed that those that were blaming Biden for high gas prices and shuddering economy are being really quiet right now.

 

If and when the prices get down to where they were prior to his taking office AND he has made some policy decisions that affect those prices he gets no credit.

A major reason they are going down is people are seriously curtailing the amount they drive.  

Huey » 08 Aug 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 10:31 am

If and when the prices get down to where they were prior to his taking office AND he has made some policy decisions that affect those prices he gets no credit.

A major reason they are going down is people are seriously curtailing the amount they drive.

Uh huh...    Yeah, I don't buy that.  
 

ScottMon » 08 Aug 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 10:17 am

I noticed that those that were blaming Biden for high gas prices and shuddering economy are being really quiet right now.

Would you feel better if we went and burned our cities to the ground like the **** THUG BLM, ANTIFA demoKKKrats do  
 

TB7 » 08 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2022, 2:05 pm

Would you feel better if we went and burned our cities to the ground like the **** THUG BLM, ANTIFA demoKKKrats do :

You guys already tried that on Jan6th.