How long ago?Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ He said what he said. I am guessing one once you heard Biden was the nominee you put on your blinders and ear muffs.
Why do you support Biden when he you know he spread doubt about the vaccine?
You have links.
Twatty,Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ You have links.
Why do you support Biden when you know he spread doubt about the vaccine?
Enough. It was just before you voted for him. And you have yet to criticize him.
So you answer the question, vaguely.Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Enough. It was just before you voted for him. And you have yet to criticize him.
you have the links you requested. Read the NYT’s link.
Why do you support Biden when you know he spread doubt about the vaccine?
Assuming that this is an answer, take a look at how many pages it took you before you finally decided to answer.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2022, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ So you answer the question, vaguely.
Ok.
It was actually not a vote for Biden as much as a recognition that the worst POTUS ever, the drug addled man baby, he described by his appointees as "a **** moron" and "dumb as ****", had run out of all potential candidates of a future administration not closely associated with the WWE.
Acknowledge that you've been answered in detail.
Now tell me how many hours gutfeld has spent working this narrative...
@Vegas
@TB7
So you FINALLY answer the question, vaguely.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2022, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ So you answer the question, vaguely.
Ok.
It was actually not a vote for Biden as much as a recognition that the worst POTUS ever, the drug addled man baby, he described by his appointees as "a **** moron" and "dumb as ****", had run out of all potential candidates of a future administration not closely associated with the WWE.
Acknowledge that you've been answered in detail.
Now tell me how many hours gutfeld has spent working this narrative...
@Vegas
@TB7
TinyToadyDefender,Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ So you FINALLY answer the question, vaguely.
Trump is not the worst according to C-Span Presidential Historians. Or the Siena Poll you posted. C-Span did theirs AFTER he left office. Not a year into his with only 13 republican “historians”.
Are these your words:
They did another one a bit later...
This year, Donald Trump enters the survey at 42nd , and he is only ranked outside of the bottom five in two of the twenty categories that scholars use to assess the presidents, ‘luck’ and ‘willingness to take risks,’” said Levy.
https://scri.siena.edu/2019/02/13/siena ... 1982-2018/
viewtopic.php?p=1496866#p1496866
Show us how it's done.Vegas » 06 Aug 2022, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Assuming that this is an answer, take a look at how many pages it took you before you finally decided to answer.
As always, you don't answer questions the first time around.
Die.
Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Enough. It was just before you voted for him. And you have yet to criticize him.
you have the links you requested. Read the NYT’s link.
Why do you support Biden when you know he spread doubt about the vaccine?
just so you can see the difference, Twatty.So you FINALLY answer the question, vaguely.
How good of you to mention Siena.Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ So you FINALLY answer the question, vaguely.
Trump is not the worst according to C-Span Presidential Historians. Or the Siena Poll you posted. C-Span did theirs AFTER he left office. Not a year into his with only 13 republican “historians”.
Are these your words:
They did another one a bit later...
This year, Donald Trump enters the survey at 42nd , and he is only ranked outside of the bottom five in two of the twenty categories that scholars use to assess the presidents, ‘luck’ and ‘willingness to take risks,’” said Levy.
https://scri.siena.edu/2019/02/13/siena ... 1982-2018/
viewtopic.php?p=1496866#p1496866
Running from your words again.
Don’t know. You tell me.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ How good of you to mention Siena.
Where did Grifty, he whom you called a great speaker "off the cuff", rank on "communication"?
Biden?
@Vegas
You may chime in at any time.
Let's see how long it takes you to answer the question.Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Don’t know. You tell me.
You can chime in with whether or not these are your words,
So you FINALLY answer the question, vaguely.
Trump is not the worst according to C-Span Presidential Historians. Or the Siena Poll you posted. C-Span did theirs AFTER he left office. Not a year into his with only 13 republican “historians”.
Are these your words:
They did another one a bit later...
This year, Donald Trump enters the survey at 42nd , and he is only ranked outside of the bottom five in two of the twenty categories that scholars use to assess the presidents, ‘luck’ and ‘willingness to take risks,’” said Levy.
https://scri.siena.edu/2019/02/13/siena ... 1982-2018/
viewtopic.php?p=1496866#p1496866
Did he rise, or fall?Huey » 06 Aug 2022, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Running from your words again.
So you FINALLY answer the question, vaguely.
Trump is not the worst according to C-Span Presidential Historians. Or the Siena Poll you posted. C-Span did theirs AFTER he left office. Not a year into his with only 13 republican “historians”.
Are these your words:
They did another one a bit later...
This year, Donald Trump enters the survey at 42nd , and he is only ranked outside of the bottom five in two of the twenty categories that scholars use to assess the presidents, ‘luck’ and ‘willingness to take risks,’” said Levy.
https://scri.siena.edu/2019/02/13/siena ... 1982-2018/
viewtopic.php?p=1496866#p1496866
My question came first. The minute you acknowledge your post of Siena that did have trump ranked last I will answer you question.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2022, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's see how long it takes you to answer the question.
After you acknowledge your post.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2022, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Show us how it's done.
Siena issued its presidential survey recently.
Where did Grifty rank?
Did you post this?