Did not visit Tokyo !
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Aug 2022, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems pretty clear that the entire story was not reported here.
I can imagine that an 80 year old woman could be extremely disruptive.
Not that there is proof of this, but it is certainly conceivable.
There is not a word about the alleged "man wearing a woman's bathing suit'.
It is possible that eh simply cleared out as soon as the old woman started complaining.
No one was harmed, so I hardly think that any executions as Poppa Wheelie says, are required.
The OLD LADY was harmed..her rights were violated.Xavier_Onassis » 06 Aug 2022, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems pretty clear that the entire story was not reported here.
I can imagine that an 80 year old woman could be extremely disruptive.
Not that there is proof of this, but it is certainly conceivable.
There is not a word about the alleged "man wearing a woman's bathing suit'.
It is possible that eh simply cleared out as soon as the old woman started complaining.
No one was harmed, so I hardly think that any executions as Poppa Wheelie says, are required.
All I see in the news is speculation about "how hard" CV19 hit them.
nefarious101 » 06 Aug 2022, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ 80-Year-Old Woman Banned From Community Pool After Complaining Man Watching Little Girls Undress In Shower Room: Report
An 80-year-old woman was banned from using a community pool run by the YMCA in Washington state after she expressed her anger because she said that a man dressed in a woman’s swimsuit was watching little girls undress and also saw her naked in the women’s showers, according to local media reports.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/80-year- ... oom-report
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Aug 2022, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems pretty clear that the entire story was not reported here.
I can imagine that an 80 year old woman could be extremely disruptive.
Not that there is proof of this, but it is certainly conceivable.
There is not a word about the alleged "man wearing a woman's bathing suit'.
It is possible that eh simply cleared out as soon as the old woman started complaining.
No one was harmed, so I hardly think that any executions as Poppa Wheelie says, are required.
ScottMon » 06 Aug 2022, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ Whats the matter? Can't provoke people with your inaccurate assumption?
Whoever defends 'em is 'em.nefarious101 » 06 Aug 2022, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ We got a number of "man in a dress" suspects right there in this forum
'em-um?
Don't ban the Cuban pedophile @Xavier_Onassis , please !Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2022, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ This worthless piece of **** thinks himself a women's rights supporter.
The effeminate panty-waist has no better sense than that.
Totally useless whining !GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑ The YMCA violated her Constitutional Rights and they should be sued for it.
I agree . . . and that's because of the likes of you !
Your kind is a burden on mankind !Xavier_Onassis » 06 Aug 2022, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Let the old lady sue, I don't care.
The whole event is meaningless and silly
Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2022, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ And the dick sucking, contemptible, subhuman untermensch *** who defend this **** will tell you brick-faced that they are women's rights advocates.
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Aug 2022, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Let the old lady sue, I don't care.
The whole event is meaningless and silly
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Aug 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Some pervert doing this is not doing it because of any political affiliation. In a country of 330 million people, there are bound to be some sickos.
This sort of thing happens seldom, but only recently has it occurred to anyone to claim that it is because of some sort of political movement. It isn't, and those that claim it is are clearly propagandists seeking to convince morons of their silly interpretations.