Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Making up **** again, I see. Go consult Kim Jung Un, he sniffs everyone too. But in a way you will appreciate.
At least, until nightfall and the Korean popweasels come.
Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Making up **** again, I see. Go consult Kim Jung Un, he sniffs everyone too. But in a way you will appreciate.
reciting social consensus among a population changing ancestors cradle to grave only evolving here now will never explain why or how evolving forward never exceeds being alive now honestly in any court serving humanity's governance over ever changing population present where absolute power of suggestion is a constant absolute corruption of power by we say so semantics and anyone resisting instinctively will be cast out of every reality protecting humanities currently in charge of directing outcomes for each arriving great great grandchild forward born in the moment here.Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Making up **** again, I see. Go consult Kim Jung Un, he sniffs everyone too. But in a way you will appreciate.
At least, until nightfall and the Korean popweasels come.
….you’re right….Neo » 23 Aug 2022, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ Think the DOJ has been politicized by both sides since Clinton. The actions they took against Trump and associates should concern everyone.
Owning a safe is not a crime, foolish person. Trump was hiding STOLEN DOCUMENTS and the FBI had every reason to loo9k in his safe.Neo » 09 Aug 2022, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I want to hear progressives rise above their tds and say this isn't right. If they don't they can expect this same behavior as they are setting precedents. There are hundreds of Trump appointed federal judges, I am sure the Bidens and Pelosis have safes.
I put your incoherent drivel in proper order:omh » 23 Aug 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ reciting social consensus among a population changing ancestors cradle to grave only evolving here now will never explain why or how evolving forward never exceeds being alive now honestly in any court serving humanity's governance over ever changing population present where absolute power of suggestion is a constant absolute corruption of power by we say so semantics and anyone resisting instinctively will be cast out of every reality protecting humanities currently in charge of directing outcomes for each arriving great great grandchild forward born in the moment here.
There were no documents stolen. I hope you are as understanding when these tactics are predictably used against prominent democrats, the bar has been set.Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ Owning a safe is not a crime, foolish person. Trump was hiding STOLEN DOCUMENTS and the FBI had every reason to loo9k in his safe.
….without an affidavit, how do you really know the real reason the fbi raided Mar a Lago in the first place?Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ Owning a safe is not a crime, foolish person. Trump was hiding STOLEN DOCUMENTS and the FBI had every reason to loo9k in his safe.
Trump ILLEGALLY TOOK documents that he knew he had no right to take.Neo » 23 Aug 2022, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ There were no documents stolen. I hope you are as understanding when these tactics are predictably used against prominent democrats, the bar has been set.
The president is a document classifier, he is one primary source of classification or declassification. He literally cannot, by nature of his office, steal documents. I don't think the raid was justified. I don't think we needed an armed special forces unit to serve Steve Bannon with a warrant. I don't think we needed to keep people in jail for months who were ultimately convicted of petty misdemeanors. I see a pattern in this ****, bet you do too.Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump ILLEGALLY TOOK documents that he knew he had no right to take.
If that is not stealing, then what is it?
It sure as Hell is not legal,
The documents were requested before, several boxes of them were delivered, and Trump's lawyers signed a document claiming that this was ALL the document that had been taken to Mar a Lago. But they LIED. And after questioning numerous people, the FBI decided that they would have to take the remaining documents by force. \\\\
Apparently, Trump assumed that he could get away with lying. It has worked so well for him before...
Existentializing actual life with theories and theologies kinetic exponential whole into radii interpretations of ignoring the same thing socially in every franchised reality defining what humanity has become historically forward from only existing here as ancestrally reproductively alive now.Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ I put your incoherent drivel in proper order:
a absolute absolute alive among ancestors and any anyone arriving be being born by cast changing changing charge consensus constant corruption court cradle currently directing each ever every evolving evolving exceeds explain for forward forward governance grandchild grave great great here here. honestly how humanities humanity's in in in instinctively is moment never never now now of of of of only or out outcomes over population population power power present
See how it is more orderly? And none of the meaning is lost, either.
Neo » 23 Aug 2022, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ There were no documents stolen. I hope you are as understanding when these tactics are predictably used against prominent democrats, the bar has been set.
Neo » 23 Aug 2022, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ The president is a document classifier, he is one primary source of classification or declassification. He literally cannot, by nature of his office, steal documents. I don't think the raid was justified. I don't think we needed an armed special forces unit to serve Steve Bannon with a warrant. I don't think we needed to keep people in jail for months who were ultimately convicted of petty misdemeanors. I see a pattern in this ****, bet you do too.
Well, Trump’s cult following set the precedent.
The FBI helped Biden by lying to Facebook and Twitter so they would block the Hunter story. Except FB and Twitter likely knew it was a lie.Xavier_Onassis » 10 Aug 2022, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you mean "nothing will satisfy me".
I found Biden passing his latest bill satisfied me.
I found Biden getting a Supreme Court justice satisfied me.
The measures to do something positive about Global Warming are a good start.
Trump suffering a massive infarction would be great.
If the sumbitch would just admit that the election was free, fair and he LOST, that would satisfy me.
I will be satisfied if Marco Rubio and Don DiSantis LOSE in November.
Trump is planning to steal the next election, that is NOT SATISFYING.
His indictment conviction and incarceration would be very satisfying.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVoZ70ilULw
I have odd sleep habits.