Liberal Forum

Neo » 11 Aug 2022, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:33 am

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:14 am

Neo, for **** sake...

He only survived his term because the GOP didn't have the balls to do the right thing.

Impeached over a phone call asking for an investigation that was in the national interest. Bet Zelensky regrets not investigating the Bidens, he'd likely still have a country. 
 

 

Huey » 11 Aug 2022, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:46 am

A perfect phone call.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:48 am

Huey » 11 Aug 2022, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:46 am

A perfect phone call.

That's what you were told to believe. 

Then the National Security people started talking.
 

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 5:38 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 5:38 am

It's what the guilty do.

Huey » 11 Aug 2022, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:49 am

Now who is buzzing around?

It is humor, moron.  Jeez, you take things to literally, Too Far.

ScottMon » 11 Aug 2022, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 6:14 am

It's hilarious that you think the FBI is corrupt but not Trump.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:12 am

They have him "dead to rights".

Neo » 11 Aug 2022, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:33 am

Impeached over a phone call asking for an investigation that was in the national interest.

Neo » 11 Aug 2022, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:33 am

Bet Zelensky regrets not investigating the Bidens, he'd likely still have a country.

Huey » 11 Aug 2022, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:30 am

Ok.  Using your logic this man was guilty in the fast and furious scandal

DOJ Official Asserts Fifth Amendment Right in Refusing to Testify in Probe of Operation Fast and Furious

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Patrick Cunningham, the chief of the criminal division in the Arizona U.S. Attorney’s office, has informed the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that he intends to exercise his fifth amendment right not to incriminate himself next Tuesday at his deposition. Cunningham’s response, made through his lawyer, to a subpoena issued by the committee is extremely rare. More alarming is how broad Cunningham intends to rely on the Fifth Amendment. His lawyer has informed the committee that the only information Cunningham would provide is his name and title at the Department of Justice.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=3&p=2101439#page-body

Using BV's logic not only is this guy guilty but fast and furious was a criminal offence.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:52 am

Huey » 11 Aug 2022, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:49 am

Now who is buzzing around?

It is humor, moron.  Jeez, you take things to literally, Too Far.

Twatty,

I can appreciate why you would run from your earlier position.
 

 

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Aug 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:55 am

Trump took Fifth Amendment more than 440 times in refusing to answer New York attorney general’s questions

Former President Donald Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment right more than 440 times Wednesday in refusing to answer questions at a deposition by lawyers for New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is investigating the Trump Organization’s business practices, a source with knowledge of the session told NBC News.

Shortly after arriving at that court-ordered interview under oath at James’ offices in lower Manhattan, Trump released an email saying he would not answer any questions given the Fifth Amendment right barring people from being compelled to make self-incriminating statements.

Trump answered just one question — his name — and then cited the Fifth on every other question he was asked during the deposition, his lawyer Ronald Fischetti told NBC News.

...

Trump’s refusal to answer questions was legal, and had been anticipated in the judicial order mandating his attendance at the deposition. But it could harm his chances of prevailing against James in any civil litigation she files in connection with her probe.

...

Judge Arthur Engoron also wrote that if the Trumps invoked the Fifth Amendment, their refusal to answer questions cannot be used against them in a criminal prosecution.

But Engoron went on to note that a jury in a civil case is allowed to draw “a negative inference” when a party to the case “invokes that right against self-incrimination.” In other words, James could argue to a jury that it should assume Trump has conceded her claims against him by refusing to answer her questions.

...
 
 

 

Huey » 11 Aug 2022, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:54 am

What, that a DOJ official took the fifth in the fast and furious case?  Meaning that using your EARLIER position that means he is guilty and that Fast and Furious was against the law.

Skans » 11 Aug 2022, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:54 am

It's hard for me to imagine a reason to speak to an FBI agent, unless you are reporting a federal crime.

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Aug 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:55 am

Trump took Fifth Amendment more than 440 times in refusing to answer New York attorney general’s questions

Former President Donald Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment right more than 440 times Wednesday in refusing to answer questions at a deposition by lawyers for New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is investigating the Trump Organization’s business practices, a source with knowledge of the session told NBC News.

Shortly after arriving at that court-ordered interview under oath at James’ offices in lower Manhattan, Trump released an email saying he would not answer any questions given the Fifth Amendment right barring people from being compelled to make self-incriminating statements.

Trump answered just one question — his name — and then cited the Fifth on every other question he was asked during the deposition, his lawyer Ronald Fischetti told NBC News.

...

Trump’s refusal to answer questions was legal, and had been anticipated in the judicial order mandating his attendance at the deposition. But it could harm his chances of prevailing against James in any civil litigation she files in connection with her probe.

...

Judge Arthur Engoron also wrote that if the Trumps invoked the Fifth Amendment, their refusal to answer questions cannot be used against them in a criminal prosecution.

But Engoron went on to note that a jury in a civil case is allowed to draw “a negative inference” when a party to the case “invokes that right against self-incrimination.” In other words, James could argue to a jury that it should assume Trump has conceded her claims against him by refusing to answer her questions.

...
 
 

freeman » 11 Aug 2022, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:53 am

Am I supposed to pretend I haven't been hearing that over and over, from you lefty commie scumbags, for over 5 years now?
You've been brainwashed by commie liars regarding Trump for over 5 years now and you still don't have the mental capacity to realize it.

So what did the warrant detail they were looking for?

Huey
Thanks for that.  Posted the same info yesterday.

Skans » 11 Aug 2022, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:52 am

ScottMon » 11 Aug 2022, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 6:14 am

It's hilarious that you think the FBI is corrupt but not Trump.

It's even more hilarious that you think Trump is corrupt, but not the FBI.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 8:06 am

you have no **** idea what's going on.

As usual.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 5:38 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 5:38 am

Skans » 11 Aug 2022, 4:04 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 4:04 am

Smart man.  Anyone interrogated by the corrupt FBI should plead the 5th. Standard procedure.

It's what the guilty do.

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2022, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 8:03 am

Huey » 11 Aug 2022, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2022, 7:54 am

What, that a DOJ official took the fifth in the fast and furious case?  Meaning that using your EARLIER position that means he is guilty and that Fast and Furious was against the law.

Tiny,

In your skull, everything is like everything else.

You only know Fast&Furious as a slogan. You have no idea what the issues were.

Your beloved Grifter has repeatedly stated his position on taking the 5th.

Now he's roasting over it.