I admit when I lose or I am wrong. You, it so much.Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2022, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ That's patently silly, 3.5CatchUpDebilitatingIssue.
peepee » 20 Aug 2022, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ ....listen and learn, puppet trump cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus]![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYqzOSpgs_I&t=332s

That's ****.

Given your jumbled but clear enough definition of an "idiocrat" it would seem you hate yourself.nefarious101 » 20 Aug 2022, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ You expect to make any headway acting like a **** for brain progressive talking point idiocrat?...that only works when you are dealing with other **** for brain progressive talking point idiocrats
what is an idiocrat you may ask
An idiocrat is someone with the brain of a 12 year old gangster with a forrest gump iq, thinks all smart people are ***, easily develops a pack mentality around other idiots, never uses logic, is an asshole, only laughs at the crudest humor, etc.
I can tolerate stupid people that are nice & mean people that are smart, but I have no patience with idiocrats.
What's the difference between an idiocrat and an idiot
Idiots are/can be mature, nice, generous, respect smart people, & be intelligent in other areas.
Idiocrats are immature, mean, selfish, & have no respect for smart or logical people.
You have been proven wrong often. And lost at least 3 challenges. Liar.
When I'm PROVEN wrong, I do.Huey » 20 Aug 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ You have been proven wrong often. And lost at least 3 challenges. Liar.
Lmao! Bring up the thread. Man up.Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2022, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ When I'm PROVEN wrong, I do.
You, not so much.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations.
Why?
jack » 20 Aug 2022, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Given your jumbled but clear enough definition of an "idiocrat" it would seem you hate yourself.

Man up.
nefarious101 » 20 Aug 2022, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ I talking about reality....you can do your little pretending thing but don't expect anyone other than other pretends to play along with you.
Only one of us is equipped to engage in a battle of wit......it's not you....but I am kind of impressed you have the balls to think you could....but don't expect me to let you keep them
If you only have one, stay on the porch.Only one of us is equipped to engage in a battle of wit...
Proof of what?
Well, you won’t bump the thread because because you got thoroughly curbstomped.Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2022, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ It's not about the evidence, it's about my narratives....yap!
how does the universe perpetually balance ever changing total sum arrives here now when each individual reproduction only exists in series parallel time of evolving forward now as specifically occupying space geographically present?Xavier_Onassis » 19 Aug 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ Every star is a center sun to a solar system revolving around it. Star doesn't revolve around a solar system's planets.
While it is true that there seems to be no instances of stars orbiting planets, it is false to claim that every star has orbiting planets.
It is also indisputable that this has not one goddamned thing to do with your silly rambling crap about separation of current ancestors.
Separation of current ancestors and ancestry is ancestries died while living ancestors change current population forward now or when added great great grandchildren generation doesn't happen again, extinction reached fruition.
You seem to crave extinction, you keep referring to it in every post.

I've visited debate sites many times over the years. This is the first time I've been told I can't keep my balls.nefarious101 » 20 Aug 2022, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ I talking about reality....you can do your little pretending thing but don't expect anyone other than other pretends to play along with you.
Only one of us is equipped to engage in a battle of wit......it's not you....but I am kind of impressed you have the balls to think you could....but don't expect me to let you keep them
jack » 20 Aug 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ I've visited debate sites many times over the years. This is the first time I've been told I can't keep my balls.

ANOTHER DAY COMES AND GOES WHERE LYING SACK OF **** PEEPEE FAILS TO BACK UP HIS CLAIM THAT I EVER SAID....peepee » Today, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 1:16 pm
."this from someone who says "he hates jewish people"
In that case you're off to a bad start. Until your present post which isn't half bad in sentence structure, just hackneyed in content, you've been a model of a sputteringnefarious101 » 20 Aug 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ no...you can't....any one of us here is more than capable of verbally castrating your dumb ***....look at the bright side...you could actually be a "man in a dress" and not just a pretender.
jack » 21 Aug 2022, 4:14 am » wrote: ↑ In that case you're off to a bad start. Until your present post which isn't half bad in sentence structure, just hackneyed in content, you've been a model of a sputtering
gasbag,
