And what about the taxpayers and parents of kids who are traumatized, ostracized, and demonized by right winged laws, policies, and practices that seek to "disappear" them (in the vernacular of certain thread titles herein)?NEILCAR » 20 Aug 2022, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ My position is the taxpayer and the parents should have control over what is being taught.
Nice flowery rant. Except I want my school system to teach the basics.B.See » 20 Aug 2022, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑ And what about the taxpayers and parents of kids who are traumatized, ostracized, and demonized by right winged laws, policies, and practices that seek to "disappear" them (in the vernacular of certain thread titles herein)?
What about the taxpayers and parents of minority students whose HISTORY right winged laws, policies, and practices seek to "disappear" under the auspices that someone might feel "uncomfortable" - as one Fux news pundit described her visit to a Black history museum?
Are you suggesting those taxpayers and parents SHOULDN'T have those rights?
You take money from the school district and then you do not do what they want ... yes they are under attack ... deservedly so ...B.See » 20 Aug 2022, 1:13 am » wrote: ↑ When I created my first thread on what Republicans are doing to education in America, I called it an assault.
And NOW that war has ALSO devolved into attacks, intimidation, and even violent threats, directed not only at teachers and school administrators, but toward school board members, elected representatives, libraries, librarians...
and EVEN STUDENTS THEMSELVES.
PG THREAD RULES: applies to this thread as all my PG enabled threads: rational discussions, points counter points, rebuttals and responses are welcome, but NOT personal insults, name calling, fabricating 'direct' quotes, hate speech, drive by **** posting, trolling, and senseless content. Some who've habitually engaged in such have already been uninvited, while others have NOT been uninvited...yet.
For ONE, the MAGA REICH is not only trying to remove Black history (under the guise of CRT) and "disappear" gay people (under the guise of "sex education") but they're trying to supplant it with their FAR RIGHT propaganda and DISINFORMATION.NEILCAR » 01 Sep 2022, 5:37 am » wrote: ↑ You take money from the school district and then you do not do what they want ... yes they are under attack ... deservedly so ...
The public education system is supposed to teach what the individual school district wants them to teach. That is the very fundamental reason the public create the districts and allows taxation for the schools. If you do not teach what the people in that school district want, you are subject to recall, teacher being dismissed, or voted out at the next election.
If people do not want CRT, SEX, or Geography to be taught within their school district ... they can make it happen. It is their school district, and you are using their money.
nice flowery argument.B.See » 02 Sep 2022, 11:10 pm » wrote: ↑ For ONE, the MAGA REICH is not only trying to remove Black history (under the guise of CRT) and "disappear" gay people (under the guise of "sex education") but they're trying to supplant it with their FAR RIGHT propaganda and DISINFORMATION.
Secondly, what about what the parents of gays, minorities, and people who DON'T SUBSCRIBE TO HATE BASED RIGHT WINGED IDEOLOGY want? They don't get to have a say??
Third, taxpayer money is now being funneled into private and parochial schools that in turn have said gay students need not apply. Why the **** should taxpayer money fund their right to discriminate??
Bottom line, the MAGA CULTURE WAR on education is a war upon MINORITIES, GAYS, AND ANY KNOWLEDGE CONTRARY TO THEIR FASCIST WHITE SUPREMACIST IDEOLOGY.
It is not a "flowery argument" and I don't appreciate your trying to characterize it as such. I'm putting forth counterpoints to YOUR arguments. Fact is voters don't always control either school districts or board members, especially not in private, charter, or parochial schools.NEILCAR » 03 Sep 2022, 3:57 am » wrote: ↑ nice flowery argument.
... If the majority of the people within a school district do not want a subject taught ... they have the authority, the money, and the right to make it so. (whether you or I like it or not).
... The people created the school district, they fund the school district, and by voting for board members -- they control the school district ...
The people who live within the school district have the final say ...B.See » 03 Sep 2022, 5:05 am » wrote: ↑ It is not a "flowery argument" and I don't appreciate your trying to characterize it as such. I'm putting forth counterpoints to YOUR arguments. Fact is voters don't always control either school districts or board members, especially not in private, charter, or parochial schools.
Bottom line is, the right has LONG been attacking public education and they are now engaged in a CULTURE war aimed at removing and censoring parts of American history and demonizing minorities and gay people.
Oh, not to worry. I fully understand your point of view. You believe people within a school district have the right to obscure another people's history, to deny and or ignore "uncomfortable" facts about America's history, and to ignore, dehumanize, disenfranchise, and discriminate against those who THEY traditionally try to "other." as undesirables not worthy of either recognition or respect.NEILCAR » 03 Sep 2022, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ The people who live within the school district have the final say ...
Minor point, it is their school district, they are the ones who created it, who fund it, and who control what is taught.B.See » 04 Sep 2022, 5:12 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, not to worry. I fully understand your point of view. You believe people within a school district have the right to obscure another people's history, to deny and or ignore "uncomfortable" facts about America's history, and to ignore, dehumanize, disenfranchise, and discriminate against those who THEY traditionally try to "other." as undesirables not worthy of either recognition or respect.
And I happen to disagree.
Contrary to your position that "the people" have the right to determine what gets taught, the FACTS ARE that Repubicans DON'T WANT THE PEOPLE TO DETERMINE A DAMNED THING.NEILCAR » 04 Sep 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Minor point, it is their school district, they are the ones who created it, who fund it, and who control what is taught.
Those are facts that at some point in time you will have to accept.
The Electoral College is how we have been electing Presidents for over 240 years. If you are going to play the game learn the rules.B.See » 06 Sep 2022, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ Contrary to your position that "the people" have the right to determine what gets taught, the FACTS ARE that Repubicans DON'T WANT THE PEOPLE TO DETERMINE A DAMNED THING.
HE DIDN'T WIN THE POPULAR VOTE THE FIRST TIME. So how the **** he expected to win the second time, AFTER ALL HIS HATEFUL, DIVISIVE ****, is beyond ME. The mirrors this jackass had been looking in must've CERTAINLY been LYING TO HIM.
The people who pay for the education get to tell them what they can teach ... good, bad, or indifferent ...