Liberal Forum

DeplorablePatriot » 24 Mar 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2023, 12:10 pm

Well, he was a diminutive fellow, and without help, most any real man could kill him with his bare hands. Same with our modern leaders. Most are wimps. Not like in the dark ages, when leaders lead with their own kick-*** abilities...out in front.

you realize he won the iron cross for his combat in WW1?

Heil Hitler! » 12 Apr 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 4:14 pm

?

. vs ? or ? vs .

?(Question) time not the .(period) one exists simultaneously evolving spontaneously here now. Doubt doesn't resolve misdirection, it enables it to spread into each next generation by design within the species speculating life exceeds living as currently never same details twice.

Simple compounding results changing everything universally here in form and shape adapting to the situation eternity exist because each cycle's time is originated as combined forward from here.

You know the old joke about never getting lost because "I am always here until I am not ever again.". Every body experiences personally evolving into never duplicated results adapting to the same moment as everything else outside one's own displacement.

Self evident described something about everything specifically here. Evolving doesn't leave anything as it was when arrived. Evolving is kinetic, evolution is ideas about how and why it was what is going forward here, now, as part of the whole.

Balancing a new total sum all the time expands in every direction because molecular content contracts from every angle combining the never duplicated details never creating same results again.

Rule of 72 compounding yields to what is left evolving forward here. Back to here or there or not anymore, never was. Binary coding of universally never happened 0 or existed once.

Time is objectively here subjected to form shaped inorganically or ancestrally.

FOS » 13 Apr 2023, 12:48 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 12:48 am

you realize he won the iron cross for his combat in WW1?

I highly doubt it was won through hand-to hand combat though. Without weapons, I suspect we could each throttle him like a child if it were today.    
 
 

DeplorablePatriot » 13 Apr 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 12:09 pm

I highly doubt it was won through hand-to hand combat though. 

there wasnt a lot of kung fu in the trenches of ww1. But he was a serious soldier and displayed uncommon valour.

FOS » 13 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm

there wasnt a lot of kung fu in the trenches of ww1. But he was a serious soldier and displayed uncommon valour.

I realize that. But he was a diminutive, rather un-masculine and soft man.

DeplorablePatriot » 13 Apr 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 12:12 pm

I realize that. But he was a diminutive, rather un-masculine and soft man.

lol...no. he was quite masculine. I cant imagine how you are measuring this. Just because he didnt have the physique of some WWE champion? I seriously doubt that the undertaker would have the stones to brave physical danger as much as hitler did throughout his life

Nostradamus'omh » 12 Apr 2023, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2023, 4:35 pm

Really! You need that explained again.

You have never ever explained that, or anything else. All you post is nonsensical gibberish.

Cannonpointer » 13 Apr 2023, 12:38 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 12:38 am

He was 5'8". 

He was born in 1889. In 1920, when he was recuperating from mustard gas exposure during the first world war, he was slightly above average height for German men, By 1933, when Hitler was elected, he was average height for German men. He remained so until his death. Look for yourself, midwit:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/aver ... -countries

Be honest - you feel kind of stupid - yes?

He's not known for his physical prowess or hand-to-hand fighting skills. Show me where he is. He was a ******. Be honest...his SS trained men could easily kick his ***. 

DeplorablePatriot » 13 Apr 2023, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 7:20 pm

He's not known for his physical prowess or hand-to-hand fighting skills.

Only gays have to move goal posts, Mary.

DeplorablePatriot » 13 Apr 2023, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 7:20 pm

Show me where he is. He was a ******. Be honest...his SS trained men could easily kick his ***.

I should hope so, *******.

So, the NEW argument is that he, as a middle aged man, could not beat one of his most elite soldiers in hand to hand combat? Are we sticking with this, or are you going to move the goal posts AGAIN?

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 8:27 pm

Hitler sad blacks are getting paid for work.

Spice haired collie dogs beg the question. 
 

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 7:21 pm

Yeah Hitler would be mad we pay blacks money for their work.

dude...Hitler was actually more tolerant of black people than the average american at the time. In fact the NSDAP criticized FDR for refusing to sign the anti lynching bill. Hitler showed no disappointment about, say, blacks winning medals in the 1936 olympics. He didnt like race mixing...but then again neither does the nation of islam. Dont confuse the national socialists and the confederacy...they were actually kinda opposites in very important ways

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 9:48 pm

Hitler is sad now blacks are getting paid for work.

are you on drugs?

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 9:50 pm

Nope bud light. And you?

well you are just wrong. hitler was not in favor of slavery.

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 9:50 pm

Do you think Hitler was mad when the American black took home all those medals beating the germans?

lol no dude...germany actually won the most medals that year by far...like double of what the americans took home

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 9:51 pm

Do you think Hitler was mad when that American black boxer took the title from the gernan?

dude...the boxer who beat the german for world heavyweight champion was actually jewish

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 9:54 pm

so Hitler was happy to lose to a race he said was inferior.

he never said they were inferior...

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 9:55 pm

Oh I'm sure Hitler threw a party after a blacks beat Germans. You're probably correct. Broke out the cake I'm sure.

the blacks didnt beat the germans dude lol...like i said...the germans won 1936 olympics overwhelmingly. Yes i am sure he was indeed pleased with the result

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 9:57 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 9:57 pm

Oh Hitler just loved it. I bet he ordered it to happen. Told those Germans don't you dare win against a weaker race.

I am sure hitler felt blacks are rather stupid, because they are. But it was not a subject i can recall him speak about. But this doesnt mean that they are terrible at sports. i do not believe hitler gave a single **** that black people won some medals.

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 10:01 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 10:01 pm

Hitler was a crazy man. Totally insane.

you are not giving me the impression that you know anything about him lol

Trumprules » 13 Apr 2023, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2023, 10:14 pm

Yeah if I was you I wouldn't answer the question about how many American you want to.kill.

dude you need to watch fewer hollywood movies. national socialism simply is not about killing people