B.See is still trying the learn the art of fishing too.nefarious101 » 23 Aug 2022, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ B.See is unable to deal with any opinion but his own. He's not exactly what we would call a "sharp tack"....He only posts threads that he can censor anyone who call him out for being a progressive idiocrat liar. He's a snowflake that requires ear plugs to exist
and yes....you got it right....he is one of those twinkies that calls his butt his mangina

To the mindset of a certified liberal, that's simply not an equitable solution.Zymarikaphobia » 23 Aug 2022, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Edit your account to not display signature lines
For someone that claims they are "Intellectual" YOU ARE ONE DUMB SON OF A BITCH
Zeets2 » 23 Aug 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ To the mindset of a certified liberal, that's simply not an equitable solution.
Diehard libs are not content that they ALONE aren't subjected visually to a meme they hate.
They need to be certain that NO ONE ELSE is permitted to see it either.
Only then can they move on to the next imaginary butt-hurt they're forced to suffer through.
Now, if it was ME that was the "offender", I'd double down and add two more insulting memes alongside it that are even worse examples of the corrupt and demented moron he helped stick us with! The harm done to my country by that action alone wouldn't balance out in a century of insulting signature lines from everyone here!
I'd consider it "just desserts" and wouldn't have even told him how to avoid seeing it with his overly sensitive liberal eyes.
Love me some Jim Varney. He was from the town I live in. I knew people who went to school with him.roadkill » 23 Aug 2022, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑ Propagandists don't like to be interrupted. Know wadda I mean Vern?![]()
Rock » 23 Aug 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Love me some Jim Varney. He was from the town I live in. I knew people who went to school with him.
Truth hurts, huh Cuban pedophile ?Xavier_Onassis » 22 Aug 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ What is your idiotic Kim Jung Un photo with the quote that "Biden sniffs everyone" anything but the cheapest of shots?
Don't lie, I would like to see the insults but I can't...B.See » 23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑ Ignore 'em NF. RK is a lying m------------. I hadn't said a thing to him until he decided to engage in insults, in not one, but TWO pg threads. It's all still there for anyone to see.
That's another lie, I was nice and respectful and you banned me anyway....I've engaged in many conversations with people in the pg thread with whom I've disagreed. They weren't banned. And the ones who were, CHOSE (like he did) to show disrespect and contempt, for me and for the requests I've made re. posting in those threads... and deliberately so.

Jantje_Smit » 23 Aug 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ Don't lie, I would like to see the insults but I can't...
That's another lie, I was nice and respectful and you banned me anyway....
Don't act all holy, you are a lying vengeful troll and everyone knows it... lol.. ok, not everyone, but BV and nutin don't really count...
![]()
Is it true Ronjuls wife died in a kitchen fire...? India burning brides and ancient practice is on the rise (smh.com.au)
When you think about it, it's easier to understand why liberals are NEVER happy! They exist in a permanent state of anguish over dozens of perceived horrors against them every day of their existence, and helping to relieve them of their suffering on any one of them or even any 10 of them is completely pointless and futile. Without having some imagined complaint to occupy their pea-brains and justify their very existence, they would hibernate in mommy's basement, no doubt with their toys and favorite blankie, and their thumbs ensconced firmly either in their mouths or up their own *** for consolation.roadkill » 23 Aug 2022, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Exactly...the complainer in question, like all leftists, wants to be offended to maintain their level of anger.
Zeets2 » 23 Aug 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ When you think about it, it's easier to understand why liberals are NEVER happy! They exist in a permanent state of anguish over dozens of perceived horrors against them every day of their existence, and helping to relieve them of their suffering on any one of them or even any 10 of them is completely pointless and futile. Without having some imagined complaint to occupy their pea-brains and justify their very existence, they would hibernate in mommy's basement, no doubt with their toys and favorite blankie, and their thumbs ensconced firmly either in their mouths or up their own *** for consolation.
Got it! Billy will take care of him!B.See » 23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑ Ignore 'em NF. RK is a lying m------------. I hadn't said a thing to him until he decided to engage in insults, in not one, but TWO pg threads. It's all still there for anyone to see.
I've engaged in many conversations with people in the pg thread with whom I've disagreed. They weren't banned. And the ones who were, CHOSE (like he did) to show disrespect and contempt, for me and for the requests I've made re. posting in those threads... and deliberately so.

that pasta *** guy is really going through a massive eruption of NHB butthurt.....he can't take it....people won't agree with him and it pisses him off something fierce....kind of like BV used to do....rather thin skinned wouldn't you say?

nefarious101 » 23 Aug 2022, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ that pasta *** guy is really going through a massive eruption of NHB butthurt.....he can't take it....people won't agree with him and it pisses him off something fierce....kind of like BV used to do....rather thin skinned wouldn't you say?
Did you use a breitbart link? I bet you did...roadkill » 22 Aug 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ B.See takes cheap shots at me from his PG Twinkie Butt threads...then he quickly bans me from responding.
![]()
![]()
No Scott Stelter...I did not.

Shame, You and neffy love those right wing conspiracy theory websites that give you the cognitive bias without the conflict of having to truly think things out.
ScottMon » 23 Aug 2022, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Shame, You and neffy love those right wing conspiracy theory websites that give you the cognitive bias without the conflict of having to truly think things out.
I take this as a concession that you believe this video without any proof at all because you want it to be true.
ScottMon » 23 Aug 2022, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I take this as a concession that you believe this video without any proof at all because you want it to be true.