Bluto...racist and sexist, and proud of it.GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Aug 2022, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh **** yeah....especially after the 2nd or 3rd abortion...total devastation.........
IKE BANANA..NHBs DESIGNATED AUTHORITY ON PRISON SEX...just axe IKE..he been dere...he dun dat...

At the time of the founding abortion was not an issue, among the politicians, church leaders, or the people. If the fetus wasn't moving is wasn't a person yet. And fetuses typically don't start noticeably moving around on average until week 18.Cannonpointer » 22 Aug 2022, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't doubt they would favor choice with regard to pregnancy.
As regards substance use, there is good evidence they'd have favored significant governmental regulation. Their inclusion of eminent domain laws demonstrates their conviction that society qua society has rights and powers above those of the individual.
IkeBana » 22 Aug 2022, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Your argument regarding drugs and alcohol related to eminent domain does not hold water. The founders clearly had a personal revulsion of the government dictating a citizen's choices of what they might choose to put into their bodies. Eminent domain isn't about controlling individual choice. It's about land and control of land ownership, not any individual's personal choices. The Harrison Act would have had the founders puking.
Only one of us can tell a decent sort from an asshole Dr. Mengele.Cannonpointer » 22 Aug 2022, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ We will have to agree to disagree - and only one of us can tell a bull from a cow, fruity.
So if someone tells his doctor that he has given some thought to shooting up a stadium....the doctor should be forced to keep it to himself because of confidentiality law.....got it.IkeBana » 22 Aug 2022, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Your pro-choice criteria sucks.
Medical confidentiality laws in all 50 states say an abortion is nobody's **** business besides the woman and her doctor's business.
IkeBana » 22 Aug 2022, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Only one of us can tell a decent sort from an asshole Dr. Mengele.
DE BURF MAMMA BE SAIN SHE DUN WANT NO MUFFUGGEN "ZEBRA BABY"...MANEPastafarian » 22 Aug 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like General Tao’s chicken.
Do you know what was wrong with that fetus? Do you have any inside information?
that’s your wet dream, closet pedo.Cannonpointer » 22 Aug 2022, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ In his frail cosmology, the fact that Scott Peterson was convicted of DOUBLE homicide proves everything - that a fetus is a person and that every abortion is a prosecutable murder.
He's not a nuanced dick sucker - he's your eager deep throater.
And given he prefers negro penis, good luck shaking the fruit cake, my n word.
So this wasn’t a legal abortion?Cannonpointer » 22 Aug 2022, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑ In his frail cosmology, the fact that Scott Peterson was convicted of DOUBLE homicide proves everything - that a fetus is a person and that every abortion is a prosecutable murder.
He's not a nuanced dick sucker - he's your eager deep throater.
And given he prefers negro penis, good luck shaking the fruit cake, my n word.
You're as stupid about confidentiality law as you are about everything else bluto. There is one legal exception to confidentiality law. Rarely seen in medical cases, most often seen in mental health/psychiatric cases. If the patient or client appears to be a legitimate threat to self or others, such as musing about shooting up a first grade classroom, the doctor or clinical counselor has a legal duty to warn possible victims and contact the police. And that does not legally constitute a breach of confidentiality law.GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Aug 2022, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ So if someone tells his doctor that he has given some thought to shooting up a stadium....the doctor should be forced to keep it to himself because of confidentiality law.....got it.
simple compounding DNA changing population makes any fetus a new number in total sum reproduced since inception of the species and ancestry involved.Zymarikaphobia » 22 Aug 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Even as roughly half the states have moved to enact near-total bans on abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June, anti-abortion activists are pushing for a long-held and more absolute goal: laws that grant fetuses the same legal rights and protections as any person.
So-called fetal personhood laws would make abortion murder, ruling out all or most of the exceptions for abortion allowed in states that already ban it. So long as Roe established a constitutional right to abortion, such laws remained symbolic in the few states that managed to pass them. Now they are starting to have practical effect.
Already in Georgia, a fetus now qualifies for tax credits and child support, and is to be included in population counts and redistricting.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fetus-person ... 11108.html
@Blackvegetable @Xavier_Onassis **** YOU! ABORTION IS MURDER! HUMAN LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION!
Search "When does human life begin" and read the Princeton University link that quotes numerous embryology textbooks (which is what doctors read in med school). And the many other Google references. Human life begins at conception. This is science. This is a human rights issue.
According to a recent Pew survey, remarkably only 30% of Americans know the clear & scientific answer. Be smart, be educated. This is human rights.
your sarcasm is a huge Freudian Slip by your instinctive brain ignoring why and how you occupying space as one of a kind now. define who you are again typecast by rule of law and how you served humanity after birth?Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ simple compounding DNA changing population makes any fetus a new number in total sum reproduced since inception of the species and ancestry involved.
Of course it does. That is why we need to complicate compounding DNA populations before we are up to our armpits in fetuses.
Just watch and see how omh demonstrated the truth of this with his crude origami, crayola and hole-punching skills.
Freudian slip: another term poor sole does not understand.omh » 23 Aug 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ your sarcasm is a huge Freudian Slip by your instinctive brain ignoring why and how you occupying space as one of a kind now. define who you are again typecast by rule of law and how you served humanity after birth?
combined choices made and promises to never agree now is eternity kept.
I completely understand what separates intellectual possibilities from instinctive self evident results. Brain navigating space during the time one has adapting in series parallel displacement as ancestrally centered balancing out what remains alive now.Xavier_Onassis » 23 Aug 2022, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ Freudian slip: another term poor sole does not understand.
Just you wait, I am planning to occupy space as THREE of a kind and we will all combine to mug you are steal your eternity, and hide it in Melania's sock drawer!
I can spot you for a racist, cocksucker.
The mother appears to be as much a "legitimate threat" to the unborn child...as any other patient who has told his doctor that he has had random thoughts of shooting up a stadium.IkeBana » 23 Aug 2022, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ You're as stupid about confidentiality law as you are about everything else bluto. There is one legal exception to confidentiality law. Rarely seen in medical cases, most often seen in mental health/psychiatric cases. If the patient or client appears to be a legitimate threat to self or others, such as musing about shooting up a first grade classroom, the doctor or clinical counselor has a legal duty to warn possible victims and contact the police. And that does not legally constitute a breach of confidentiality law.
Got it? You ignorant cocksucker.
Tatiana Tarasoff, ****.

Whatever you say, fruitcake. But he's YOUR stalker now.