Google "4th Amendment," you servile lickspitte.Skans » 25 Aug 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, mostly because the "rights" I champion stem from our Constitution. Yes, I do believe in this Country's founding principles, including religious principles and the Constitution. What rights, particularly, do you think I do not support?
Cannonpointer » 25 Aug 2022, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
Gladys Kravitz is a busy body - not a body of evidence. A "phone call" from Gladys Kravitz (or Abner, for that matter) doesn't mean jack ****. It is not uncommon that the person who CALLED the cops is the one who goes to jail. Your mere ability to cop call does not overcome the United States Constitution.
You are a shining example of being teachable and fair.Cannonpointer » 25 Aug 2022, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure.
The only people who ever accuse me of "racism" or "homophobia" are *** and ***.
Yeah, they're cop callers - unlike russkies.DeplorablePatriot » 25 Aug 2022, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Good old Gladys. I didn't know Ukrainians were such busybodies.
But cops are morons.DeplorablePatriot » 25 Aug 2022, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll just address the title of ***'s thread here.
You lost before you started, by labelling all cops as morons. Are all blacks, ***? No. Are all whites, white trash? No. Are all people named ***, ***? Yes.
The fourth Amendment. Did you stop at the third Amendment?Skans » 25 Aug 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, mostly because the "rights" I champion stem from our Constitution. Yes, I do believe in this Country's founding principles, including religious principles and the Constitution. What rights, particularly, do you think I do not support?
Ha! You went back, watched it again, and now realize that what I said was dead-on accurate. So, you backtrack and try to bust me on the overall "theme" of the video, which was not what I was discussing.Cannonpointer » 25 Aug 2022, 8:14 pm » wrote: ↑ The outcome of the "entre video," ***, is that the cops broke the law, and the victim will be compensated.
Now, you can **** like the weak homo that you are - doesn't change the facts, fruity.
There was no search and no seizure going on in that video. A cop asked the man to identify himself. I call that exercise of the Cop's 1st Amendment right.
I addressed Cannonpointer on this - go find it and read it, so that I do not need to repeat myself.Pastafarian » 26 Aug 2022, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ The fourth Amendment. Did you stop at the third Amendment?
No, you post it and elaborate.Skans » 26 Aug 2022, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ I addressed Cannonpointer on this - go find it and read it, so that I do not need to repeat myself.
There was an attempt at search and seizure.Skans » 26 Aug 2022, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑ There was no search and no seizure going on in that video. A cop asked the man to identify himself. I call that exercise of the Cop's 1st Amendment right.
No such thing as "attempt at search and seizure". There was only conversation. No restriction of movement, no cuffs, no arrest. The cop didn't do anything wrong. Pastor Asshole was all jacked-up and ready to tongue-lash that white-boy cop. That's what REALLY happened.
A conversation with the police is a lie fest in the cop’s favor.Skans » 26 Aug 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ No such thing as "attempt at search and seizure". There was only conversation. No restriction of movement, no cuffs, no arrest. The cop didn't do anything wrong. Pastor Asshole was all jacked-up and ready to tongue-lash that white-boy cop. That's what REALLY happened.
You are delusional.
Delusional, slave.Skans » 26 Aug 2022, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ and now realize that what I said was dead-on accurate. So, you backtrack and try to bust me on the overall "theme" of the video, which was not what I was discussing.
Okay, fruity.Skans » 26 Aug 2022, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ You're a real piece of work, Cannonpointer, like observing in real time a "special child" work all day in class just to garble out the title to "Dick and Jane".
There was no search. There was no seizure. There was no arrest. The 4th Amendment does not apply. Pastor Asshole just ran off at the mouth. Jumped down the cop's throat like he wanted to kill that cop.Pastafarian » 26 Aug 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ A conversation with the police is a lie fest in the cop’s favor.
The police attempted to seize this man’s ID.
You are really bad at the Constitution.
HE was seized, stupid. His PERSON.
The only way that officer can exercise RIGHTS is in his capacity as a PERSON - not as a cop.Skans » 26 Aug 2022, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑A cop asked the man to identify himself. I call that exercise of the Cop's 1st Amendment right.
As usual, you have nothing further to rebut anything I've said. Why don't you go and trade gibberish poems with @omh - that's about the level of conversation anyone can expect from you.Cannonpointer » 26 Aug 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ You are delusional.
I watched it once - did not need to watch it again to know that you are a servile lickspittle.
Delusional, slave.
Okay, fruity.
Live in your special world. We both know you are Thin Lips Burns - a shell. And neither of us has any solution for your problem.
That is why I just point and smirk. There is no cure.
Bcuz the man did not allow it.Skans » 26 Aug 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ There was no search. There was no seizure. There was no arrest. The 4th Amendment does not apply. Pastor Asshole just ran off at the mouth. Jumped down the cop's throat like he wanted to kill that cop.
Yes.Cannonpointer » 26 Aug 2022, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ HE was seized, stupid. His PERSON.
Google, "4th Amendment," and have an adult explain it.
The only way that officer can exercise RIGHTS is in his capacity as a PERSON - not as cop.
Cops have no more rights than lounge chairs, in the exercise of their duties - only PEOPLE have rights.
Cops have only powers and duties. They exceeded theirs, stooge - and now, you get to pay.