No.JinnMartini » 24 Aug 2022, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Do we really need a "molecular geneticist" to know that ?
No.omh » 25 Aug 2022, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ Isn't a geologist a molecular scientist of inorganic periodic elements that shape the planet life is self contained in?
You may not, but:ScottMon » 25 Aug 2022, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ I know the difference between XY and XX but I don't care if some dude wants to call themselves a woman.
A few points on her comments:Rock » 24 Aug 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a scientist speaking. Libs are always telling cons to believe the science. I believe this scientist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qKkGfhT8hM
is that literally, figuratively, relatively, socially, intellectually true, instinctively accurate, or ancestrally accountable to how, why, what, where, when, which, whom is present as a whole population of homo sapiens reproductions occupying space geographically alive now?
No...we are telling you to believe the actual science. Not **** from ****Rock » 24 Aug 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ This is a scientist speaking. Libs are always telling cons to believe the science.
Oh the “actual” science.IkeBana
No...we are telling you to believe the actual science. Not **** from ****
scientists who managed to earn a graduate degree or medical degree...y'know, like Trump **** medical advisors Ronny Jackson and Scott Atlas.![]()
Speaking of Jackson and Atlas, Josef Mengele was also a "scientist."
And if this stupid nazi cow is concerned about women being raped in prison what she needs to do is go campaign on YouTube about how American prisons are places where the management is so **** up that anybody can be raped by anybody else, regardless of their gender identity.
A problem with the American people is that, like Donald Trump, they are too intellectually lazy, too gullible, and too stupid to take the time to do a little critical investigating, to have enough intellectual curiosity, to figure out who they should and should not be listening to. This country is 46% full of lazy ***, stoopid ****.
That's not really the point, do you think that some dude that calls himself a woman is a woman?ScottMon » 25 Aug 2022, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ I know the difference between XY and XX but I don't care if some dude wants to call themselves a woman.

I thought you were an intelligent person. A major asshole but intelligent. If you think that you know more than a molecular geneticist then you're even dumber than I thought. If you think a man can become a woman just by saying they are a woman or vise versa you're the stupidest mother **** on earth. And if you think it's okay that a man can be placed in a woman's prison and impregnate other woman then there's no hope for you.IkeBana » 25 Aug 2022, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ No...we are telling you to believe the actual science. Not **** from ****
scientists who managed to earn a graduate degree or medical degree...y'know, like Trump **** medical advisors Ronny Jackson and Scott Atlas.![]()
Speaking of Jackson and Atlas, Josef Mengele was also a "scientist."
And if this stupid nazi cow is concerned about women being raped in prison what she needs to do is go campaign on YouTube about how American prisons are places where the management is so **** up that anybody can be raped by anybody else, regardless of their gender identity.
A problem with the American people is that, like Donald Trump, they are too intellectually lazy, too gullible, and too stupid to take the time to do a little critical investigating, to have enough intellectual curiosity, to figure out who they should and should not be listening to. This country is 46% full of lazy ***, stoopid ****.
Which makes you independent of any intellectual curiosity.Independent » 25 Aug 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Oh the “actual” science.![]()
I agree with your last paragraph except from the opposite perspective. You speak of yourself. People like you are too lazy to challenge what you are spoonfed.
You mistake people who listen to the spoonfed ****, go out and investigate for themselves, apply critical thinking and arrive at a conclusion as the lazy ones. That’s bass ackwards.
ha ha ha what separates intellectual curiosity from instinctive curiosity? What if we debate what about they, them, those people vs what is life being part of the moment here?Ike Bana » 25 Aug 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Which makes you independent of any intellectual curiosity.
ha ha ha rainmanomh » 25 Aug 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ ha ha ha what separates intellectual curiosity from instinctive curiosity? What if we debate what about they, them, those people vs what is life being part of the moment here?
typecasting me from a character played by Dustin Hoffman really isn't describing me as my ancestral position is in plain sight.
What does, useful idiot? Not being a blind puppet?IkeBana » 25 Aug 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Which makes you independent of any intellectual curiosity.
I don't give a ****. It impacts me in no way.Jantje_Smit » 25 Aug 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ That's not really the point, do you think that some dude that calls himself a woman is a woman?
![]()
Those issues are outlier as you guys are so fond of saying.Skans » 25 Aug 2022, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ You may not, but:I suppose you are just another uncaring, heartless Democrat who hates children, especially most normal girls who like to play sports.
- Girls competing in tennis leagues do
- Girls who swim for their high schools do
- Girls who play soccer do
- Parents with girls who want to pursue athletics do
- I care if boys want to pretend to be girls, or men pretend to be women to the detriment of other girls and women
In other words, you agree with me. You acknowledge the injustice to women competing in sports as a result. But, you JUST DON'T GIVE A RAT'S *** about it. DemocRAT.ScottMon » 25 Aug 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Those issues are outlier as you guys are so fond of saying.
About women's sports, I really don't think that's my problem to work out.Skans » 25 Aug 2022, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ In other words, you agree with me. You acknowledge the injustice to women competing in sports as a result. But, you JUST DON'T GIVE A RAT'S *** about it. DemocRAT.
Is a transgender woman a woman?ScottMon » 25 Aug 2022, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Those issues are outlier as you guys are so fond of saying.
I've encountered this problem two times in my immediate family. Trust me, IT'S A PROBLEM! But, I hope DemocRATS continue to ignore it and embrace trans-idiots.ScottMon » 25 Aug 2022, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ About women's sports, I really don't think that's my problem to work out.