My personal positions have no relation to Stink Finger's (probably) unconstitutional act that wiped out the "saving" he touted.Blackvegetable » 26 Aug 2022, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ And, lahwd knows, you're a dyed in the bloomers Recidivist Supply Side Voting Deficit Hawk.
I bet you rode Scrub real hard in 2004....
Really?ConsRule » 26 Aug 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ My personal positions have no relation to Stink Finger's (probably) unconstitutional act that wiped out the "saving" he touted.
Diversion attempt: FAIL!
But feel free to continue trolling.
Actually, it's a tax INCREASE for everyone who has debt forgiven. You claim to be very intelligent and informed, don't you know debt that is forgiven is taxable income for the person given the relief? They are in for a surprise the next time the file a tax return and have to declare that income that did not have taxes withheld because the loan documents (and yes, I have read them as my daughter took out a student loan) do not contain a provision that excludes them from income if the debt is forgiven in this manner. The forgiveness must be for work performed in certain areas by selected professionals.Blackvegetable » 26 Aug 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Really?
When the Hucksters for whom you vote either promptly vaporize any surplus or multiply the existing deficit, you reward them with your fealty. And for that they deliver **** macro economic results.
Think of this as a narrowly targeted tax cut. If economic theory holds, this should divert income from those with a low marginal propensity to consume, to those with a higher one.
Under what legal authority?Buffalo » 26 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑
I say make the goddamn universities with $100's' of BILLIONS in endowment funds pay those loans off!!!
Gee, that's funny, that Manhattan prosecutor has COMPLETELY dropped THEIR case, the NY State Case has been BS from the start and it's been OVER A YEAR for what?? Nothing so far.G
Pastafarian
Trump is going to more than one court, twittty bird.
Technically so was the delta between your mortgage and what the bank collected when you turned in your keys in 2008...ConsRule » 26 Aug 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, it's a tax INCREASE for everyone who has debt forgiven. You claim to be very intelligent and informed, don't you know debt that is forgiven is taxable income for the person given the relief? They are in for a surprise the next time the file a tax return and have to declare that income that did not have taxes withheld because the loan documents (and yes, I have read them as my daughter took out a student loan) do not contain a provision that excludes them from income if the debt is forgiven in this manner. The forgiveness must be for work performed in certain areas by selected professionals.
NEW YORK — The Trump Organization and former Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg couldn’t shake the Manhattan District Attorney’s bombshell fraud case on Friday, as a New York judge nixed their bid to dismiss the case.Beekeeper » 26 Aug 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Gee, that's funny, that Manhattan prosecutor has COMPLETELY dropped THEIR case, the NY State Case has been BS from the start and it's been OVER A YEAR for what?? Nothing so far.
Oh, and that little pesky 4th Amendment will come into play as will the AUTHORITY that the President has with ANY AND ALL documents he so wishes with the wave of his hand to become declassified!! And I can bet that ALL of his claims will be fully upheld in the nations HIGHEST court, don't you??
So gay boy, what else you have??
Enjoy the fact that you and your nasty bunch of morons just handed Trump the Presidency in 2024 and your veiled attempts to dismiss him have all failed!!
I bet that really sucks for you, huh??
But not the right to keep them.will the AUTHORITY that the President has with ANY AND ALL documents he so wishes with the wave of his hand to become declassified!!
Under what legal/Constitutional authority did braindead biden have to **** hard working, taxpaying families with his edict wiping out of $600 BILLION in student debt?\ConsRule » 26 Aug 2022, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Under what legal authority?
Nobody forced those people to sign the loan documents. It isn't a crime to charge more than something is probably worth. If it were, every Starbucks franchise owner would be in jail.

B.See » 26 Aug 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ This IS their country, take a good look at the photos below and take note that everything these primitive people touch...turns to ****.




I agree 100%...you should read more of my post related to this topic.Buffalo » 26 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Under what legal/Constitutional authority did braindead biden have to **** hard working, taxpaying families with his edict wiping out of $600 BILLION in student debt?\
Borrowers that default on a debt are sent a 1099 form from the lender and have to declare it as income for tax purposes, Einstein.
Key words highlighted.Blackvegetable » 26 Aug 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Technically so was the delta between your mortgage and what the bank collected when you turned in your keys in 2008...
But it was almost universally forgiven.
I know someone who held 1.2 million in mortgage obligations against 2 part time jobs paying a total of 20k per year.
Good for you and them. Anecdotal evidence is proof of nothing...assuming it's even true.Blackvegetable » 26 Aug 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I know someone who held 1.2 million in mortgage obligations against 2 part time jobs paying a total of 20k per year.
I bet the write off was more than 35%..
Never heard boo from the IRS.
It was the rule....I'd like to hear of the exception.ConsRule » 26 Aug 2022, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Good for you and them. Anecdotal evidence is proof of nothing...assuming it's even true.
OH WAIT!!! You left out the BEST PART in that ARTICLE you used!!!Blackvegetable » 26 Aug 2022, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ NEW YORK — The Trump Organization and former Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg couldn’t shake the Manhattan District Attorney’s bombshell fraud case on Friday, as a New York judge nixed their bid to dismiss the case.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/1 ... e-00051421
But not the right to keep them.
You're a **** *******.
Vance never charged Trump, and Vance’s successor, Bragg, has declined to do so.
Grifty is still being prosecuted by both Manhattan and the State.Beekeeper » 26 Aug 2022, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ OH WAIT!!! You left out the BEST PART in that ARTICLE you used!!!
So there you have it!! NO CHARGES for Trump, but what you failed to do is READ that the charges were against WEISENBERG and he struck a plea deal a couple of weeks ago, so your CRAP is now officially FLUSHED!!!!
Oh and Slick Willies SOCK DRAWER ruling says HE IS!!! Better GOOGLE THAT ONE and do some COMPREHENSIVE READING on that one, doofus!!
See ya in the funny papers!!!
Odd. You are in Nashville but have spent the majority of the day posting.Blackvegetable » 26 Aug 2022, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Grifty is still being prosecuted by both Manhattan and the State.
