Liberal Forum

Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 9:14 am

The repost where you explained the relevance of the 22 argument.

Not repeating it.

You've acknowledged it.

You haven’t been waiting for anything.
 

Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 9:54 am

Not this **** again….  

Obviously you can’t with the number of reposts you demand.

Because you lie

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:13 am

Not repeating it.

You've acknowledged it.

You haven’t been waiting for anything.

Not this shot again.  Don’t ever ask me to repost anything.

Accept your loss and move on.  

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:14 am

Because you lie

You lost.
 
 
 

jack » 04 Sep 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:07 am

Witnesses as we know being standard operating procedure when the FBI, or any law enforcement agency, is examining evidence seized in an authorized search. When there ought to be witnesses is anytime Donald Trump has his hands near something valuable that doesn't belong to him.

You've been well trained in the art of progressive idiocracy's  "sarcastic dumbassery"....very convincing too.....but what does that have to do with reality?  You treat fake news and radical opinions as if they are real


Here...let me jog you're memory....."Russia Russia Russia"

Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:17 am

Not this shot again.  Don’t ever ask me to repost anything.

Accept your loss and move on.

I show you, and you take 2 years off.

nefarious101 » 04 Sep 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:19 am

jack » 04 Sep 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:07 am

Witnesses as we know being standard operating procedure when the FBI, or any law enforcement agency, is examining evidence seized in an authorized search. When there ought to be witnesses is anytime Donald Trump has his hands near something valuable that doesn't belong to him.

You've been well trained in the art of progressive idiocracy's  "sarcastic dumbassery"....very convincing too.....but what does that have to do with reality?  You treat fake news and radical opinions as if they are real


Here...let me jog you're memory....."Russia Russia Russia"

 

Those 2 notes again, Naffy?

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:40 am

I show you, and you take 2 years off.

No challenges for you.  The only thing You will get is I will repost when you request.  

jack » 04 Sep 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:07 am

Witnesses as we know being standard operating procedure when the FBI, or any law enforcement agency, is examining evidence seized in an authorized search. When there ought to be witnesses is anytime Donald Trump has his hands near something valuable that doesn't belong to him.

Who were the witnesses?

Ms Halligan told CBS she and another lawyer for Mr Trump were barred from entering the complex, and that the search was divided into three sections: a bedroom, office and storage area.

https://www.bbc.com/news

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:40 am

I show you, and you take 2 years off.

@Huey  

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:59 am

@Huey

You just proved you can’t read.  Already answered.

Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 11:01 am

You just proved you can’t read.  Already answered.

Try again.

You've been lying...

I show you, you take 2 years off, Yappy..

 

Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:54 am

Who were the witnesses?

Ms Halligan told CBS she and another lawyer for Mr Trump were barred from entering the complex, and that the search was divided into three sections: a bedroom, office and storage area.

https://www.bbc.com/news

Why do you believe he has a right to witnesses to the search?

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 11:03 am

Try again.

You've been lying...

I show you, you take 2 years off, Yappy..

no, two weeks of my choosing.

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 10:40 am

I show you, and you take 2 years off.

At no point have you posted, or reposted a narrative explaining the relevance of the 22 argument or the report.

Two week of my choosing for me.  And when you lose, two weeks for you of your choosing.

Within the next month.

Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 11:05 am

no, two weeks of my choosing.

Two years.

Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 11:14 am

At no point have you posted, or reposted a narrative explaining the relevance of the 22 argument or the report.

Two week of my choosing for me.  And when you lose, two weeks for you of your choosing.

Within the next month.

Two years, starting the moment I post it.

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 11:18 am

Two years.

Ok.but, when you post that lame repost that does offer your narrative of relevance you take two years.  

No, w,early state what the challenge is in your opinion.aw, **** it.  I’ll repost it.  You lose
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 2:18 pm

You quote me here,

viewtopic.php?p=2118312#p2118312

Why are you retelling?

Do you appreciate why should shouldn't interpret?

This is your only repost.

The quote in question, the post at the link, does not explain the relevance.

See ya in two years

Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2022, 11:04 am

Why do you believe he has a right to witnesses to the search?

Not relevant to the post I responded to.

Try again, *******.

In two years,