I post my answer, you take off after you read it.Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ Ok.but, when you post that lame repost that does offer your narrative of relevance you take two years.
No, w,early state what the challenge is in your opinion.aw, **** it. I’ll repost it. You lose
State exactly what you are going to post.
What point were you making?Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Not relevant to the post I responded to.
Try again, *******.
In two years,
It's not like we're gonna trust you, ****. Got any legitimate reason why we can't trust the FBI's handling of the documents Trump stole? They're not his documents, they're ours.nefarious101 » 31 Aug 2022, 5:18 am » wrote: ↑ Just like the progressive idiocracy likes no witnesses to vote counting...they also like no witnesses to Mar-a-Lago document handling. Americans are just supposed to trust them
My answer.Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ State exactly what you are going to post.
The accusation is you have posted nothing that explains the relevance of you 22 argument OR you report concerning Biden’s statement.
If you post the same **** I do you take two years off, those are the terms
I asked a question, *******. Read the post I responded to.
Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ State exactly what you are going to post.
The accusation is you have posted nothing that explains the relevance of you 22 argument OR you report concerning Biden’s statement.
If you post the same **** I do you take two years off, those are the terms
And that's a lie.The accusation is you have posted nothing that explains the relevance of you 22 argument OR you report concerning Biden’s statement
Your rule.
stop crying.
I wasn’t talking to you. Read the post I responded to. He is the one who said a witness would be there.
A rule is a **** rule, Twatty.Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ I wasn’t talking to you. Read the post I responded to. He is the one who said a witness would be there.
Damn dude, you are one non reading waste of a whore’s ****.
Then explain the challenge.
Cool. You are just trolling now.
Twatty,Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Cool. You are just trolling now.
Also, his name isn’t blackvegetable.
Looks I called your bluff.Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ Then explain the challenge.
Prove I am lying. I just read all 5 pages of your **** on this and no, you didn’t. Your 22 BS and your 3x Bs, and the report are not relevant to Biden’s “any other gun” comment.
You're a pathological liar...and this is just more of your pathological ****.Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ stop crying.
If you can’t explain the challenge then I can’t except. ******.
State exactly what you are going to post.
The accusation is you have posted nothing that explains the relevance of you 22 argument OR you report concerning Biden’s statement.
If you post the same **** I did you take two years off, those are the terms
If you can’t explain the challenge then I can’t except. ******.
Not this **** again…IkeBana » 04 Sep 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ You're a pathological liar...and this is just more of your pathological ****.
You are..Huey » 04 Sep 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Not this **** again…![]()
Then prove it. I have read all 5 pages of your posts. Prove it and stop yapping.
Look idiot, since they day you and your merry band of idiots showed you goal was to get guys like me to leave. Well, you failed. Your idiots bailed leaving you here alone.
Ow **** or get off the pot, ******. You talk too much ****.
Stop whining and just do it. The longer you go the more dumb you look. Of that’s possible.
Your 22 BS and your 3x Bs, and the report are not relevant to Biden’s “any other gun” comment.